by Fred Sisto | 1 de septiembre de 2020 | Blog, Bufete de abogados de inmigración criminal , Condado de Monmouth, New Jersey, Condado del océano
On June 15, 2020, a three-judge appellate panel decided the Middlesex County case of State v. Alexander Andrews. The principal issue under N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6.2 involved the Assignment Judge’s comparison of the defendant’s case to similar cases in overruling the State’s...
by Fred Sisto | 29 de Agosto, 2020 | Blog, Bufete de abogados de inmigración criminal , Condado de Monmouth, New Jersey, Condado del océano
The Appellate Division concluded with the following in relevant part: While we conclude the plain language of N.J.S.A. 2C:43-2(b)(2) authorizes defendant’s custodial sentences as a condition of his probation, we also observe a probationary sentence conditioned...
by Fred Sisto | 26 de Agosto, 2020 | Blog, Bufete de abogados de inmigración criminal , Condado de Monmouth, New Jersey, Condado del océano
Judge Vernoia continued in relevant part: More pertinent here, the Court also directed that, where the trial court concludes a probationary sentence is appropriate, “it must condition that term on a 270-day period of community service or of incarceration without...
by Fred Sisto | 23 de Agosto, 2020 | Blog, Bufete de abogados de inmigración criminal , Condado de Monmouth, New Jersey, Condado del océano
The Appellate Division continued in relevant part: Here, the periods of parole ineligibility imposed as conditions of defendant’s imprisonment do not fall within the Hartye proscription. The trial court did not sentence defendant to a term of imprisonment at a...
by Fred Sisto | 20 de Agosto, 2020 | Blog, Bufete de abogados de inmigración criminal , Condado de Monmouth, New Jersey, Condado del océano
The Court recognized that both subsections (b)(2) and (b)(3) of N.J.S.A. 2C:43-2 provide for imposition of terms of “imprisonment,” and it noted differences between the imprisonment authorized in each subsection. For example, the Court explained that a...