Bail Pending Appeal (Part 1)

by | Jan 24, 2016 | Appeals, Blog, Criminal Law, Legal Procedures

Prison-bound defendants generally fall into two categories. The first category involves those who are convicted of a first or second degree crime. The second category deals with those whose prior records are bad and are therefore not amenable to probationary sentences, even though probation could otherwise be imposed for a third or fourth degree crime.

While there is a right to appeal the various issues that were decided by the trial court, that right often rings hollow when a relatively short prison sentence is handed down. For example, a defendant will usually have to serve a minimum of six months in the state prison sentence before being considered for parole. Because appellate courts have finite resources they almost never decide a case on appeal within six months of a defendant’s sentence. Therefore, even a meritorious appeal on a relatively short prison sentence will not be decided until a defendant has already served their time. While the vacation of a conviction could still help a defendant by way of erasing a criminal record, i.e. it can improve future employment prospects and remove the related collateral consequences of being a convicted felon, the time unjustly served I prison can never be returned.

The exception to this unfortunate reality is that bail pending appeal can be granted by the trial or appellate court. However, the defendant is first required to demonstrate that allowing them to post bail while their appeal is decided does not endanger anyone’s safety.

Additionally, they must demonstrate that the appeal “presents numerous substantial questions.” The dynamic here is that the defense is essentially asking the trial judge to concede that there is a good chance that he or she erred in their decision on a particular issue or issues. Trial courts usually loathe to do this, especially after protracted litigation. And protracted litigation is usually the only kind of litigation that produces issues for appeal. That is because unless there is a full trial, the only issues that are automatically preserved for appeal are (1) motions to suppress physical evidence and (2) denials from the pre-trial intervention and drug court programs. Still, there are rare cases where judges are willing to grant bail pending appeal, especially when novel issues that have never been decided in New Jersey are at stake.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a good attorney because he is available 24-7 & always returned my calls..he makes your day in court brief so your not sitting in court all day.
Karen P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very good
Nazario B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is compassionate! His forewarning his network about DUI checkpoints are vital to public interests! He does what it NEEDED by giving us advanced notifications about avoiding situations! Thank you Fred!
Joseph R
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto handled my case very well. I was happy with outcome. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend him to any of my friends or family.
David V
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Recently I encountered some legal matters in the state of New Jersey during my visit and it would have became serious if it was not taken care of. Mr. Sisto and I discussed the case through the phone and exchanged documents through email. Since I was unable to travel back and forth due to restricted time, I have asked Mr. Sisto to handle the case on my behalf. I was very pleased with the result and would recommend Mr. Sisto for any legal matters.
Nam N
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very good, extremely professional ,
Franco F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great service
Kelly G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a good lawyer, he is really young yet made me feel confident that my lawful rights were being protected, and investigated all avenues when there was potential they weren't. He is very knowledgeable, and offered great peace of mind in such a distressing situation. I always felt like he had my back throughout the whole process, supporting aspects to my case that didn't even fall within his scope. I would highly recommend Fred.
Amy L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a fantastic attorney who is very informative, knows the system well, and is very thorough.
Bob V
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Even though I don’t drink (alcohol) much I like getting the emails of DUI checkpoints from Fred Sisto so I can avoid the inconvenience. The less contact with law enforcement the better.
Dbaby329