Bail Reform: Affidavit of Probable Cause

by | Jan 2, 2017 | Blog, Criminal Law, Law Reform and Amendments

“The Division of Criminal Justice shall work with the AOC to develop and implement practices and procedures that allow an Affidavit of Probable Cause to be filed electronically through the eCDR system to support an application for a complaint-warrant and to supplement any oral statements made under oath by the law enforcement officer applying for the complaint-warrant. The Affidavit of Probable Cause shall include a check-box allowing the officer to certify that the statements in the Affidavit are true, and acknowledging that the affiant is aware that filing willfully false statements would subject him or her to punishment.

The Affidavit of Probable Cause shall include a concise description of relevant facts and circumstances that support probable cause to believe that the offense(s) was committed and that the defendant is the one who committed it. The Affidavit shall include a concise statement as to the officer’s basis for believing that the defendant committed the offense(s) (e.g., the officer’s personal observations, statements of eyewitnesses, defendant’s admission, etc.), and shall indicate whether a victim was injured and, if so, the extent of the injury known to the officer submitting the Affidavit. The foregoing description of relevant facts and circumstances and statement as to the officer’s basis for believing that probable cause exists may be established, or supplemented, by a Preliminary Law Enforcement Incident Report prepared pursuant to Section 5.2. See also R. 3:4-2(c)(l)(A). In that event, the Preliminary Law Enforcement Incident Report shall be appended to/transmitted with and expressly incorporated by reference in the Affidavit of Probable Cause.”

On their face, these provisions would appear to provide transparency and greater insight into the charges against an accused at an early stage in the proceedings. In practice, these are on Attorney General “directives” as opposed to binding law. It is doubtful that they will be followed in the vast majority of cases. It is more likely that forms will be transmitted with incomplete sections and relatively vague accusations. If the Attorney General were serious about providing additional transparency regarding the alleged circumstances of an offense, the form would be designed so that it could not be transmitted until all sections were sufficiently filled.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Thank you !
Billy F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Although I don't know Fred, he has my appreciation in his fight for my liberty. Mothers against drunk driving have ruined as many lives as they have saved. We need bread and butter laws in N. J ! Stopping moterists assuming they are breaking a law is against my rights. N. J. Is a police state with a cop on every corner. From the unjust gas tax to the corruption in Trenton, we need more attorneys like Frederick Sisto. He is aware of the people's shrinking liberties.
Freehold F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Have nothing but great things to say about Fred, highly recommended
Bill S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
i have not needed the service of fred sisto but am grateful for the notices i receive
Bill P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is an excellent attorney. Even though we did not initiate the official pleading process, he deep dived into researching and sorted out my questions without any consultation fee. I highly recommend him!
Qianru Z
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great experience overall having Frederick P Sisto as my attorney. Sisto understands his client, very insightful and is an expert in his field. Truly a professional and marvelous individual.
Maybelin R
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a good lawyer, he is really young yet made me feel confident that my lawful rights were being protected, and investigated all avenues when there was potential they weren't. He is very knowledgeable, and offered great peace of mind in such a distressing situation. I always felt like he had my back throughout the whole process, supporting aspects to my case that didn't even fall within his scope. I would highly recommend Fred.
Amy L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I would highly recommend Frederick Sisto to anyone seeking legal representation that is fair, honest and will keep your best interest forefront. should the situation arise, i would not hesitate to seek representation from Frederick Sisto again.
Rmean
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was very professional, competent, and a pleasure to deal with I cant thank him enough I highly recommend his services
Mildred T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a fantastic attorney who is very informative, knows the system well, and is very thorough.
Bob V