Is My Medical Marijuana Prescription A Matter of Public Record?

by | May 6, 2016 | Blog, Criminal Law, Drug Crime, Marijuana

There are many people out there who know that they could benefit from the use of medical marijuana but they don’t want their friends, family, coworkers, employers, etc. to know that they are taking the drug.  This happens as a result of a common misconception caused by an Act that was passed by the State known as CUMMA.  CUMMA is the act that allows registered medical professionals to prescribe medical marijuana to their patients with certain ailments.  Once the drug is prescribed to the patient, the patient’s name is then submitted to the State in order to compile a list of citizens that can legally carry/use medical marijuana.  Due to all of the rules and regulations surrounding the situation, some people may think that the list is a matter of public record. However, after taking a close look at the Act, we can see that the list is not a matter of public record in any way, shape, or form.

The Act only authorizes State officials to access the information and distinctly states that it should not be considered a public record.  In addition, having your name added to the list doesn’t waive your patient-physician privilege which means that the physician who prescribes you medical marijuana cannot disclose that information to anyone other than the proper State officials who collect the information in order to generate the list.  You can see the entire portion of the bill that clearly states this below:

f. The department shall maintain a confidential list of the persons to whom it has issued registry identification cards. Individual names and other identifying information on the list, and information contained in any application form, or accompanying or supporting document shall be confidential, and shall not be considered a public record under P.L.1963, c.73 (C.47:l A-1 et seq.) or P.L.2001, c.404 (C.47:I A-5 et al.), and shall not be disclosed except to:

(1) authorized employees of the department and the Division of Consumer Affairs in the Department of Law and Public Safety as necessary to perform official duties of the department and the division, as applicable; and

(2) authorized employees of State or local law enforcement agencies, only as necessary to verify that a person who is engaged in the suspected or alleged medical use of marijuana is lawfully in possession of a registry identification card.

g. Applying for or receiving a registry card does not constitute a waiver of the qualifying patient’s patient-physician privilege.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr.Sisto helped me with my registration recently and it was a success. He was not only professional, but he answered in a timely matter and was very detail-oriented. He made sure my issue was resolved as fast as he could. I highly recommend Mr.Sisto to anyone who is experiencing legal issues.
Daniella T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Thank you very much for your information on DUI check points. It is a great asset to the community . 5 stars for sure!
James P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is an extremely professional and knowledgeable attorney.
Kendall J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is the best and his DUI alerts are not to be missed!
Rich D
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very knowledgeable with expungement!!! Thanks again!!!
Nicole B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Thank you Fred for all your hard work and communication through my case. I got into a situation and very fortunate to have had Fred help me resolve it. He gave me great options and advice on how he would handle the situation and the steps we needed to follow. Highly satisfied with my experience and would highly recommend. Thank you Anthony Zappulla
Anthony Z
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was excellent and helped my son deal with a issue in PPB, despite being a long distance away. He is very thorough and knows how to navigate the ins and outs of the local legal waters.
Bruces
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Frederick Sisto Law Office guided me through my legal needs, they were very responsive and professional and I would use certainly use them again
Ryan P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
The most important thing an attorney can do for their client is get results in the courtroom. Fred Sisto did this for me, and did so in such a professional and communicative manner that I would absolutely recommend him to anyone in New Jersey who is dealing with criminal charges. Fred was able get results when other attorneys did not. I definitely recommend speaking with him.
Brian C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great!!! , got my case handled in the exact manner that I was told and would recommend to everyone else in need of legal representation .
Raumelis R