State’s Drug Court Appeals: Part 4

by Fred Sisto | Jan 9, 2018 | Blog, Criminal Law, Drug Crime

The aforementioned nine factors are:

(1) the person has undergone a professional diagnostic assessment to determine whether and to what extent the person is drug or alcohol dependent and would benefit from treatment; and

(2) the person is a drug or alcohol dependent person within the meaning of 2C:35-2 and was drug or alcohol dependent at the time of the commission of the present offense; and

(3) the present offense was committed while the person was under the influence of a controlled dangerous substance, controlled substance analog, or alcohol, or was committed to acquire property or monies to support the person’s drug or alcohol dependency; and

(4) substance use disorders treatment and monitoring will serve to benefit the person by addressing the person’s drug or alcohol dependency and will thereby reduce the likelihood that the person will thereafter commit another offense; and

(5) the person did not possess a firearm at the time of the present offense and did not possess a firearm at the time of any pending criminal charge; and

(6) the person has not been previously convicted on two or more separate occasions of crimes of the first or second degree, other than those listed in paragraph (7); or the person has not been previously convicted on two or more separate occasions, where one of the offenses is a crime of the third degree, other than crimes defined in 2C:35-10, and one of the offenses is a crime of the first or second degree; and

(7) the person has not been previously convicted or adjudicated delinquent for, and does not have a pending charge of murder, aggravated manslaughter, manslaughter, kidnapping, aggravated assault, aggravated sexual assault or sexual assault, or a similar crime under the laws of any other state or the United States; and

(8) a suitable treatment facility licensed and approved by the Division of Mental Health and Addiction Services in the Department of Human Services is able and has agreed to provide appropriate treatment services in accordance with the requirements of this section; and

(9) no danger to the community will result from the person being placed on special probation pursuant to this section.

Note that factor 5 is poorly-worded. The reasonable interpretation is that those who possess firearms in furtherance of their pending criminal offenses are barred from drug court. Barring drug court participation due to the lawful possession of a firearm would almost certainly violate the Second Amendment.

      Excellent rating  
 Based on 288 reviews 
    
  
 
 
      Thank you !
     Billy F 
 
 
 
 
    Although I don't know Fred,
he has my appreciation in his fight for my liberty.
Mothers against drunk driving have ruined as many lives as they have saved.
We need bread and butter laws in N. J !
Stopping moterists assuming they are breaking a law is against my rights.
N. J. Is a police state with a cop on every corner.
From the unjust gas tax to the corruption in Trenton, we need more attorneys like
Frederick Sisto. He is aware of the people's shrinking liberties.
     Freehold F 
 
 
 
 
    Have nothing but great things to say about Fred, highly recommended
     Bill S 
 
 
 
 
    i have not needed the service of fred sisto but am grateful for the notices i receive
     Bill P 
 
 
 
 
    Fred is an excellent attorney. Even though we did not initiate the official pleading process, he deep dived into researching and sorted out my questions without any consultation fee. I highly recommend him!
     Qianru Z 
 
 
 
 
    Great experience overall having Frederick P Sisto as my attorney. Sisto  understands his client, very insightful and is an expert in his field. Truly a professional and marvelous individual.
     Maybelin R 
 
 
 
 
    Fred is a good lawyer, he is really young yet made me feel confident that my lawful rights were being protected, and investigated all avenues when there was potential they weren't. He is very knowledgeable, and offered great peace of mind in such a distressing situation. I always felt like he had my back throughout the whole process, supporting aspects to my case that didn't even fall within his scope. I would highly recommend Fred.
     Amy L 
 
 
 
 
    I would  highly recommend Frederick Sisto to anyone seeking legal representation that is fair, honest and will keep your best interest forefront. should the situation arise, i would not hesitate to seek representation from Frederick Sisto again.
     Rmean 
 
 
 
 
    Fred was very professional, competent,  and a pleasure to deal with
I cant thank him enough
I highly recommend his services
     Mildred T 
 
 
 
 
    Fred is a fantastic attorney who is very informative, knows the system well, and is very thorough.
     Bob V