State’s Drug Court Appeals: Part 4

by Fred Sisto | Jan 9, 2018 | Blog, Criminal Law, Drug Crime

The aforementioned nine factors are:

(1) the person has undergone a professional diagnostic assessment to determine whether and to what extent the person is drug or alcohol dependent and would benefit from treatment; and

(2) the person is a drug or alcohol dependent person within the meaning of 2C:35-2 and was drug or alcohol dependent at the time of the commission of the present offense; and

(3) the present offense was committed while the person was under the influence of a controlled dangerous substance, controlled substance analog, or alcohol, or was committed to acquire property or monies to support the person’s drug or alcohol dependency; and

(4) substance use disorders treatment and monitoring will serve to benefit the person by addressing the person’s drug or alcohol dependency and will thereby reduce the likelihood that the person will thereafter commit another offense; and

(5) the person did not possess a firearm at the time of the present offense and did not possess a firearm at the time of any pending criminal charge; and

(6) the person has not been previously convicted on two or more separate occasions of crimes of the first or second degree, other than those listed in paragraph (7); or the person has not been previously convicted on two or more separate occasions, where one of the offenses is a crime of the third degree, other than crimes defined in 2C:35-10, and one of the offenses is a crime of the first or second degree; and

(7) the person has not been previously convicted or adjudicated delinquent for, and does not have a pending charge of murder, aggravated manslaughter, manslaughter, kidnapping, aggravated assault, aggravated sexual assault or sexual assault, or a similar crime under the laws of any other state or the United States; and

(8) a suitable treatment facility licensed and approved by the Division of Mental Health and Addiction Services in the Department of Human Services is able and has agreed to provide appropriate treatment services in accordance with the requirements of this section; and

(9) no danger to the community will result from the person being placed on special probation pursuant to this section.

Note that factor 5 is poorly-worded. The reasonable interpretation is that those who possess firearms in furtherance of their pending criminal offenses are barred from drug court. Barring drug court participation due to the lawful possession of a firearm would almost certainly violate the Second Amendment.

      Excellent rating  
 Based on 288 reviews 
    
  
 
 
      Fred was incredibly helpful during a very stressful time. Even during a pandemic he was fast at responding to any and all questions or problems that I had. He went above and beyond to make sure that I was happy with my results and that my case was being handled properly all the way through. Highly recommend this office!
     Toni V 
 
 
 
 
    Muy buen abogado lo rrecomiendo!!
     Victor N 
 
 
 
 
    Iv had good lawyers defend me before but Mr.Sisto is beyond the best iv had. He explains everything every step of the way until your court date and excels on getting results , I defenatly recomend his services.
     Imer J 
 
 
 
 
    Fred was extremely helpful and knowledgable. He made the whole process as painless and easy as possible.
     Toli C 
 
 
 
 
    Today my life was about to change! With great communication and excellent service he was able to create the impossible!! I am now able to continue to drive for a living!! I highly recommend his services and trust his judgment-HE KNOWS HIS STUFF!!! He saved my life and livelihood today! Mr.Frank Sisto is an absolutely amazing attorney! Thank you again I’ll never forget this day! God Bless
     Edward J 
 
 
 
 
    Fred is a fantastic attorney who is very informative, knows the system well, and is very thorough.
     Bob V 
 
 
 
 
    Fred Sisto's attention to detail, his representation and unwavering advocacy for me made all the difference in my case.
     Jill F 
 
 
 
 
    Fred is an excellent attorney. Even though we did not initiate the official pleading process, he deep dived into researching and sorted out my questions without any consultation fee. I highly recommend him!
     Qianru Z 
 
 
 
 
    I have sought out Mr. Sisto for two traffic related cases. His hard work and dedication to getting results for me was very evident from the get go. He was very informative throughout the entire process of working on my cases and during the court sessions as well. Very professional and very friendly. If anyone in the area is looking for a very good and quality representation, Mr. Sisto is a go to.
     Brett S 
 
 
 
 
    Fred Sisto is a professional, knowledgeable, and exceptional attorney.  He is very responsive and maintains continuous contact with his clients via phone and email. Fred made sure that we understood the charges and was able to work on getting us the best outcome possible.  He even went above and beyond in the court room by assisting with translation from English to Spanish.  I highly recommend him to anyone who is in need of legal services and representation.  In the future if needed I would definitely use him again as an attorney.
     Sara A