Drone Law: Part 1

by | Mar 4, 2018 | Blog, Criminal Law, New Jersey

38096715 – white drone hovering in bright blue sky

A new law criminalizing certain drone activities, including “drinking and droning”, was signed by Governor Christie before he left office. The text of the law reads:

1. As used in this act:

“Operate” means to fly, control, direct, or program the flight of an unmanned aircraft system.

“Unmanned aircraft” means an aircraft that is operated without the possibility of direct human intervention from within or on the aircraft.

“Unmanned aircraft system” means an unmanned aircraft and associated elements, including communication links and the components that control the unmanned aircraft, that are required for the pilot in command to operate safely and efficiently.

b. Except as otherwise prohibited, a person who is authorized by federal law to operate an unmanned aircraft system may operate an unmanned aircraft system in this State for any purpose, provided that the person operates the unmanned aircraft system in a manner consistent with applicable federal law and regulations.  Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect federal preemption of State law regarding aviation.

For purposes of this subsection, “person” means an individual, partnership, corporation, association, governmental entity, or other legal or commercial entity.

c. An owner or operator of a critical infrastructure, including a political subdivision, may apply to the Administrator of the Federal

Aviation Administration, pursuant to section 2209 of the “FAA

Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016,” Pub.L.114-190, to prohibit or restrict the operation of unmanned aircraft systems near the critical infrastructure.

Prior to applying to the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to prohibit or restrict the operation of unmanned aircraft systems close to a critical infrastructure, a political subdivision shall hold a minimum of one public hearing, with adequate notice to the public, concerning the proposed application.

1.     The text of the law begs the question: What is “a critical infrastructure” or a political subdivision of a critical infrastructure? Anyone who values their privacy and wants to limit the ability of drone operators to watch and record them would be interested in restricting the ability of drone operators to invade their privacy. Unfortunately, the term “infrastructure” generally applies to pubic entities and private businesses related to buildings, roads, and power supplies, as opposed to private residences. Thus, the new drone law protects essential services as opposed to privacy.

 

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a good attorney because he is available 24-7 & always returned my calls..he makes your day in court brief so your not sitting in court all day.
Karen P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very good
Nazario B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is compassionate! His forewarning his network about DUI checkpoints are vital to public interests! He does what it NEEDED by giving us advanced notifications about avoiding situations! Thank you Fred!
Joseph R
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto handled my case very well. I was happy with outcome. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend him to any of my friends or family.
David V
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Recently I encountered some legal matters in the state of New Jersey during my visit and it would have became serious if it was not taken care of. Mr. Sisto and I discussed the case through the phone and exchanged documents through email. Since I was unable to travel back and forth due to restricted time, I have asked Mr. Sisto to handle the case on my behalf. I was very pleased with the result and would recommend Mr. Sisto for any legal matters.
Nam N
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very good, extremely professional ,
Franco F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great service
Kelly G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a good lawyer, he is really young yet made me feel confident that my lawful rights were being protected, and investigated all avenues when there was potential they weren't. He is very knowledgeable, and offered great peace of mind in such a distressing situation. I always felt like he had my back throughout the whole process, supporting aspects to my case that didn't even fall within his scope. I would highly recommend Fred.
Amy L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a fantastic attorney who is very informative, knows the system well, and is very thorough.
Bob V
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Even though I don’t drink (alcohol) much I like getting the emails of DUI checkpoints from Fred Sisto so I can avoid the inconvenience. The less contact with law enforcement the better.
Dbaby329