AG Modifications To CJ Reform Policies: Part 18

by | Dec 10, 2017 | Criminal Law, New Jersey

Anti-Drug ProfiteeringThe following section was also added to the Attorney General’s Directive:

5.1.2 Inclusion of Present Domestic Violence Risk Factors and Relevant Circumstances in the Affidavit of Probable Cause and/or Preliminary Law Enforcement Incident Report. In domestic violence cases in which the ODARA is administered (see Section 4.6), the Affidavit of Probable Cause and/or the Preliminary Law Enforcement Incident Report shall include concise statements indicating the presence of all risk factors found to exist throw officer’s investigation. For example, if it was determined that the victim was confined during the assault, the Affidavit of Probable Cause and/or the Preliminary Law Enforcement Incident Report shall indicate that the victim was confined. Moreover, in all domestic violence cases (whether the ODARA is scored or note, the Affidavit of Probable Cause and/or the Preliminary Law Enforcement Incident Report shall include circumstances relevant to the risks posed to a victim. See subsection 4.6.10.

This section should define what is meant by “confined”, since the presence of this factor could determine whether an accused is released on a summons or held in the county jail for two days or more while the conditions of pretrial release are set. It could mean held by the arm momentarily with no resulting injury. It could mean chained to a wall for hours or days.

The following section addressing the ODARA was also added to the AG’s Directive:

7.4.2.c Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment Score of 5 or Higher. In domestic violence cases that require the completion of the ODARA and in cases not otherwise covered under Section 7.3, unless the presumption of seeking pretrial detention is overcome pursuant to subsection 7.4.6, the prosecutor shall apply for pretrial detention if the defendant’s final score (i.e., after any proration) is 5 or higher—regardless of the PSA scores. In these domestic violence cases, the ODARA scores are to be considered in conjunction with the PSA scores and not in lieu thereof. As such, either assessment tool or both assessment tools could trigger a presumption to apply for pretrial detention. Likewise, it is anticipated that there will be cases in which neither tool will trigger a presumption.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Worst Attorney I have ever encountered he will WASTE your time and steal your MONEY. Don't RECOMMEND!
Patric W
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred completely exceeded all expectations with the result of my case.
John M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Current Pre law students and I had a question pertaining to a certain scenario in class. He responded back and gave me a case that broke down exactly what I asked for.
Chad T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is an outstanding lawyer. As a fellow attorney, I've relied on his expertise in several cases, and have referred clients to him with excellent results.
Wyman
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto did an absolutely fantastic job on my case. He achieved the best possible result for me, and really made me feel comfortable and that he had my best interest at heart. He kept in constant communication with me, was very prompt in his response to my calls and emails, and he went above and beyond in answering any and all questions that I had. His professionalism and the lengths to which he went to secure a good result for me really helped make a stressful situation feel better. If you ever find yourself in need of legal representation, I highly recommend Fred Sisto. You will not regret it.
Michael G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is extremely knowledgeable and so helpful. I would recommend him to anyone. He really goes above and beyond. He cares about his work and his clients.
Kevin M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is the best and his DUI alerts are not to be missed!
Rich D
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very good
Nazario B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a very knowledgeable and effective attorney. His knowledge of the law enables him to understand your issue, plan a strategy to address it and explain the strategy to you. He also possesses excellent communication skills that assist him interactions with other attorneys and judges.
Michael G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Many thanks to Fred for the posts of where the DWI checkpoints will be held and for the advise to take an Uber when planning a night out!!
Michael K