Bail Reform: Prosecutor’s Objection to The Defendant’s Release

by | Jan 10, 2017 | Blog, Criminal Law, Law Reform and Amendments

Anti-Drug Profiteering“If the assistant prosecutor or deputy attorney general has reason to request that the defendant have no contact with the victim of the alleged offense, or no contact with any other witness(es) who may testify concerning the offense, the prosecutor shall object to defendant’s release on recognizance pursuant  to  N.J.S.A. 2A: 162- 17(a),  and  shall  ask  that the  defendant  be  released,  if  at  all, under N.J.S.A. 2A:162-17(b), and that the defendant be ordered as a condition of release to have no contact with the victim and/or witness(es). See also subsection 6.2.3. The prosecutor shall as soon as practicable advise the victim and/or witnesses of the terms of any such pretrial release condition(s) imposed at the first appearance.”

Again, we see mischievous provisions buried in the middle of this voluminous Attorney General Directive. The mischief is not clear on its face, but the following logic cannot seriously be disputed. Here, at pages 53 and 54 of the 84 page document, we see that prosecutors are essentially directed to object to any and all releases on personal recognizance. This is because of the fact that most any case will involve an alleged victim or witness (presumably meaning “lay witness” as opposed to a police officer). The only remaining cases would be those involving victimless drug possessions. In the case of victimless drug possessions, prosecutors are directed to object to a release without pretrial conditions because of the alleged high likelihood of drug possessors (including petty marijuana offenders) to re-offend. The language above is particularly disturbing in light of the fact that the bail reform legislation is supposed to impose the least burdensome conditions on defendants, i.e. only those conditions reasonable necessary to ensure the safety of the community at large and to ensure that defendants appear at future court dates. The directive, on the other hand, presupposes that no one will come to court without pretrial conditions. Our courts recognize the empirical evidence showing that very few people abscond from pending charges.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Have been very happy to share checkpoint info with friends so they can be safe and sober drivers. Thanks for a great community effort
Ron T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Antes que todo le doy las gracias señor Frederick P Sisto por representarme legalmente es usted un excelente abogado que habla con la verdad desde el principio es usted un abogado profesional que que sabe bien lo que hace ante los juzgados sin importar mi estatus legal en este país me represento con respeto y sobre todo muy profesionalmente y pudo hacer q bajaran mi delito de segundo grado a tercer grado y lo mejor que no permitió que me dieran tempo en carcel mi familia y yo estamos muy agradecidos con usted Puedo recomendar al señor abogado Frederick P Sisto como un excelente abogado y sin duda COMO UNO DE LOS MEJORES DEL ESTADO DE NEW JERSEY First of all I thank you Mister Frederick P Sisto for representing me legally you're an excellent lawyer who speaks to the truth from the beginning you are a professional lawyer who knows well what you do before the courts regardless of my legal status in this P Country I represent with respect and especially very professionally and could make Q lower my second-degree offense to third grade and the best I did not allow me to give tempo in jail my family and I are very grateful to you I can recommend Mr. Freder Attorney Ick P Sisto as an excellent lawyer and certainly as one of the best in the state of NEW JERSEY
Raul F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is a great attorney. Highly recommend. He is very trustworthy, professional, and has great communication skills, one being that he is very down to earth and makes you feel comfortable in all possibilities. I am very happy I went with him to represent me, we received the best possible outcome for our matter, while he was honest with all possibilities along the way.
Mike A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great information sharing.
Phil S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was very professional, competent, and a pleasure to deal with I cant thank him enough I highly recommend his services
Mildred T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto was a great lawyer, my outcome of my case was just how we wanted it to be. He was very good at answering phone calls and emails in a timely fashion. He was very easy to talk to and understanding of my situation. He made sure I knew all angles of the case and our best options when moving forward. I know that hiring a lawyer isnti always easy but I highly suggest Fred Sisto if you are put in the position and are in need of a lawyer.
Cory C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Worst Attorney I have ever encountered he will WASTE your time and steal your MONEY. Don't RECOMMEND!
Patric W
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Love his warnings of dwi checkpoints. Nothing but constitutionally illegal money makers.
Honkeytonk J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I highly recommend Fred. He is very knowledgeable and will look out for your interest. I am happy with the outcome of my case. I hope I don’t have to use his services again but if I did I will definitely use him again. He also has a great personality and is very personable. That’s always a plus!
Mohammad J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto was not only a knowledgeable and excellent lawyer, he was compassionate and understanding during this difficult time. I found Mr. Sisto to always be available and he services were affordable and effective. You will not find a better lawyer.
Joseph S