Blood Draws And Unconscious Drivers (Part 1)

by Fred Sisto | Aug 6, 2019 | Blog, Criminal Law, Know Your Rights, Monmouth County, Ocean County

On June 27, 2019, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Mitchell v. Wisconsin. The principal issue was whether a driver’s lack of consciousness permits a warrantless blood draw.

Justice Alito wrote for the majority and held in relevant part as follows: Petitioner Gerald Mitchell was arrested for operating a vehicle while intoxicated after a preliminary breath test registered a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) that was triple Wisconsin’s legal limit for driving. As is standard practice, the arresting officer drove Mitchell to a police station for a more reliable breath test using evidence-grade equipment. By the time Mitchell reached the station, he was too lethargic for a breath test, so the officer drove him to a nearby hospital for a blood test. Mitchell was unconscious by the time he arrived at the hospital, but his blood was drawn anyway under a state law that presumes that a person incapable of withdrawing implied consent to BAC testing has not done so.

The blood analysis showed Mitchell’s BAC to be above the legal limit, and he was charged with violating two drunk-driving laws. Mitchell moved to suppress the results of the blood test on the ground that it violated his Fourth Amendment right against “unreasonable searches” because it was conducted without a warrant. The trial court denied the motion, and Mitchell was convicted. On certification from the intermediate appellate court, the Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed the lawfulness of Mitchell’s blood test.

The judgment is vacated. When a driver is unconscious and cannot be given a breath test, the exigent-circumstances doctrine generally permits a blood test without a warrant.

This holding is not surprising when considering that the focus in blood draw cases is on the effect that the process and the use of a needle has on person being tested. When they are unconscious, the argument is that the search is reasonable because they are not in a state of terror that many people feel when confronted with the use of a needle. It would make for an interesting case if the subject were coming in and out of consciousness during the blood draw procedure.

      Excellent rating  
 Based on 288 reviews 
    
  
 
 
      Many thanks to Fred for the posts of where the DWI checkpoints will be held and for the advise to take an Uber when planning a night out!!
     Michael K 
 
 
 
 
    Hired Mr.Sisto to handle a case of mine a couple of months ago and while the service was okay the customer service was awful. When I had inquired about a charge I was unsure of on my bill, Mr. Sisto immediately got defensive and had the unprofessionalism to ask me if I “was high” for asking this question. I wonder if Mr. Sisto asks all of his clients this question or only the ones who have jobs in the cannabis industry? Regardless, I don’t believe this was an appropriate question to ask, regardless of the industry one works in, and therefore Mr. Sisto needs to heavily work on his customer service.

Edit: Mr. Sisto had the UNPROFESSIONALISM to reach out to my family and ask them to ask me to take down my review instead of reaching out directly towards me when it was I who was his client, not my family. Clearly speaks to the unprofessionalism surrounding this practice. This has not been the only time Mr.Sisto has gone directly to my family instead of me, his client, for important legal matters and I will not seek out his services again.

For those who may not understand Spanish, the email starts with “You should speak to your daughter regarding the review she has just published.”

Edit to Response: As an attorney, one should be able to make appropriate questions and comments regardless if a client is “uncooperative” or “disrespectful.” The fact that rather than apologizing for the awful interaction with your firm, and I was not released  “within hours” as you claim shows how low value your firm is and how you openly  instead chose to harass my family through email for my initial review rather than actually revomy case which I ended up doing and you chareged me for . Regardless of results, your character speaks volumes and anyone who reads this would know better than to give their money to an awful person such as yourself. What a shame
     Ximena C 
 
 
 
 
    Fred is extremely knowledgeable and so helpful. I would recommend him to anyone. He really goes above and beyond. He cares about his work and his clients.
     Kevin M 
 
 
 
 
    I called Mr. Sisto a few weeks back and he returned the call immediately!  I asked a few questions and he clearly explained the options for one of my employees.  He then followed up with a detailed proposal.  He was completely knowledgeable, helpful and insightful.  If I ever had to use him I would feel VERY comfortable with his representation.
     Dave P 
 
 
 
 
    Highly  professional

The lawyer Frederick is a serious and professional person, he helped me a lot in my case, I recommend him a lot to help you too, he is always in contact with you explaining the process, a very patient and kind person.
     Ca 
 
 
 
 
    Always up to date on with his services.
     Anthony L 
 
 
 
 
    Nice to know where to avoid,I drive a taxi and can save time if I know where they are because they tie up traffic.
     John M 
 
 
 
 
    Although I don't know Fred,
he has my appreciation in his fight for my liberty.
Mothers against drunk driving have ruined as many lives as they have saved.
We need bread and butter laws in N. J !
Stopping moterists assuming they are breaking a law is against my rights.
N. J. Is a police state with a cop on every corner.
From the unjust gas tax to the corruption in Trenton, we need more attorneys like
Frederick Sisto. He is aware of the people's shrinking liberties.
     Freehold F 
 
 
 
 
    Fred,
Thank you for the notifications on the DUI stops.
     Joe F 
 
 
 
 
    Fred is a fantastic attorney who is very informative, knows the system well, and is very thorough.
     Bob V