Changes to Marijuana-Related Expungements (Part 6)

by | Feb 14, 2020 | Blog, Criminal Law, Drug Crime, Marijuana, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

Amendments to 2C:52-2 continued as follows:

Additionally, an application may be filed and presented, and the court may grant an expungement pursuant to this section, although less than five years have expired in accordance with the time requirements when the court finds:

  1. the court-ordered financial assessment is satisfied but less than five years have expired from the date of satisfaction, and the time requirement of five years is otherwise satisfied, and the court finds that the person substantially complied with any payment plan ordered pursuant to N.J.S.2C:46-1 et seq., or could not do so due to compelling circumstances affecting his ability to satisfy the assessment; or
  2. at least four but less than five years have expired from the date of the most recent conviction, payment of any court-ordered financial assessment, satisfactory completion of probation or parole, or release from incarceration, whichever is later; and

the person has not been otherwise convicted of a crime, disorderly persons offense, or petty disorderly persons offense since the time of the most recent conviction; and the court finds in its discretion that compelling circumstances exist to grant the expungement.  The prosecutor may object pursuant to section

11 of P.L.,    c.    (C.        ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill), N.J.S.2C:52-11, N.J.S.2C:52-14, or N.J.S.2C:52-24.

In determining whether compelling circumstances exist for the purposes of paragraph (1) of this subsection, a court may consider the amount of any court-ordered financial assessment imposed, the person’s age at the time of the offense or offenses, the person’s financial condition and other relevant circumstances regarding the person’s ability to pay.

Additional changes to the above-quoted language include decreasing the expungement petition waiting period from six years to four years. This decreased waiting period applies to “public interest” applications for the expungement of felony convictions. The “public interest” applications put a higher burden on the applicant to obtain an expungement. Otherwise, there is a lower standard to overcome with the five-year waiting period. The term “public interest” was also changed to “compelling circumstances.”

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a good lawyer, he is really young yet made me feel confident that my lawful rights were being protected, and investigated all avenues when there was potential they weren't. He is very knowledgeable, and offered great peace of mind in such a distressing situation. I always felt like he had my back throughout the whole process, supporting aspects to my case that didn't even fall within his scope. I would highly recommend Fred.
Amy L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Using Fredrick Sisto for my attorney was a great experience. He was very easy to understand and work with. Also very good at his job and hard working. I would recommend to anyone who is seeking an attorney!
Thomas L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very informative.
Patrick S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is the absolute BEST out there!! My experience with him was great he walked me thru everything and got my charges dropped!!!!!
Kat M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Thanks for sharing this information.
Joe F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I was very pleased with my representation by Fred Sisto. He is very honest and explained everything to me in detail. I would recommend him to anybody who is seeking legal representation..
Jeff M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Fred Sisto handled a case regarding my business. He was always available to answer my calls directly and helped me with any questions I had. He also had the case dismissed before I was even able to make it to the court room! I know it can be difficult when finding an attorney but I know I made no mistake choosing the law offices of Frederick Sisto, I highly recommend him!!
Kari J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred, Thank you for the notifications on the DUI stops.
Joe F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great!!! , got my case handled in the exact manner that I was told and would recommend to everyone else in need of legal representation .
Raumelis R
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred's services has been more than exceptional. He provided updates on my case. He got me one of the best outcomes i could have asked for, and has represented me twice with amazing results. Fred can work his magic on your case just as he did for me
Chris K