Drug Court Expungements & The Public Interest: Part 3

by | Sep 5, 2017 | Blog, Criminal Law, Drug Crime, Law Reform and Amendments, Monmouth County, Ocean County

The bill was amended and merged into a committee substitute with other bills that proposed various amendments to Chapter 52, mainly to reduce the waiting periods for expungements. See Assembly Committee Substitute for Assembly Bill Nos. 206, 471, 1663, 2879, 3060 and 3108, 216th Legislature (Dec. 11, 2014) (Assembly Committee Substitute). With respect to Drug Court graduates, the committee substitute substantially expanded the nature of relief offered by authorizing expungement of all prior arrests and convictions. See id. at § 1.

Note that the “waiting periods for expungements” references the waiting period between completion of a sentence and the date that an expungement application can be submitted to the Superior Court in the county where the conviction occurred. There is an eight to nine month delay before a successful application is granted, disseminated to the state agencies with a record of the arrest and conviction, and the actual purging of the records. It should come as no surprise that the purging of defendants’ conviction records is not a high priority for law enforcement agencies. This explains why the record-purging process takes so long. These delays are outside of the applicants’ and their attorneys’ control. Anyone who promises a faster turnaround should not be trusted.

Rather than limiting expungement to convictions of “crimes not included in the list of crimes that may not be expunged” in N.J.S.A. 2C:52-2(b) or -2(c), see Assembly Bill 471, supra, at § 1, the substitute referred to, as a disqualification, “a conviction for any offense barred from expungement” under N.J.S.A. 2C:52-2(b) or -2(c). Assembly Committee Substitute, supra, at § 1. We do not infer from this wording change any intent to narrow the disqualification, nor does the committee’s statement suggest one, as it simply tracks the statutory language. See Assembly Judiciary Committee Statement to Assembly Committee Substitute at 1 (Dec. 11, 2014) (“The substitute provides that a person would not be eligible for expungement under this provision of law if the records include a conviction for any offense barred from expungement pursuant to subsection b. or c. of N.J.S.A. 2C:52-2.”).

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
From the beginning Fred was fast to respond to my initial inquiry (while he was on vacation) when other lawyers took a week or never even responded. Fred was professional, understanding of my situation and on point with the the expected timelines due the delays COVID had put on the courts. The courts had objections on a few occasions and forced me to appeal on another but, Fred stood his ground for me and followed through until my matter was resolved as I expected. I recommend Mr. Sisto if you are in need his services. I will definitely use him again if I ever need to.
Steve
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Although I don't know Fred, he has my appreciation in his fight for my liberty. Mothers against drunk driving have ruined as many lives as they have saved. We need bread and butter laws in N. J ! Stopping moterists assuming they are breaking a law is against my rights. N. J. Is a police state with a cop on every corner. From the unjust gas tax to the corruption in Trenton, we need more attorneys like Frederick Sisto. He is aware of the people's shrinking liberties.
Freehold F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I was very pleased with my representation by Fred Sisto. He is very honest and explained everything to me in detail. I would recommend him to anybody who is seeking legal representation..
Jeff M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very good, extremely professional ,
Franco F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is amazing!! Definitely recommend
Jen A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Recently I encountered some legal matters in the state of New Jersey during my visit and it would have became serious if it was not taken care of. Mr. Sisto and I discussed the case through the phone and exchanged documents through email. Since I was unable to travel back and forth due to restricted time, I have asked Mr. Sisto to handle the case on my behalf. I was very pleased with the result and would recommend Mr. Sisto for any legal matters.
Nam N
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
....and his Dog Gonzo is a great attorney.
Duane H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was very professional, competent, and a pleasure to deal with I cant thank him enough I highly recommend his services
Mildred T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred's services has been more than exceptional. He provided updates on my case. He got me one of the best outcomes i could have asked for, and has represented me twice with amazing results. Fred can work his magic on your case just as he did for me
Chris K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was incredibly helpful during a very stressful time. Even during a pandemic he was fast at responding to any and all questions or problems that I had. He went above and beyond to make sure that I was happy with my results and that my case was being handled properly all the way through. Highly recommend this office!
Toni V