EMTs & Official Misconduct: Part 1

by | May 22, 2017 | Blog, Criminal Law, Legal Procedures, Monmouth County, Ocean County

Official MisconductIn the case of State v. Brandon T. Morrison, decided on December 14, 2016, the New Jersey Supreme Court considered whether a volunteer emergency medical technician (EMT), working for a private, non-profit rescue squad that receives municipal funding to provide service in a township, is a “public servant” under the official-misconduct statute, N.J.S.A. 2C:30-2(a). Writing for a unanimous Court, Justin Albin held that Morrison was not a public servant under the statute.

In 2011, the Pemberton Rescue Squad was a private, non-profit organization that contracted with Pemberton Township to provide back-up emergency ambulance services for that municipality. Defendant Brandon Morrison served as a volunteer EMT on the Squad and as the Squad’s treasurer. The Lourdes Health System supplied primary and secondary emergency medical services for the Township. As treasurer, Morrison maintained the Squad’s checkbook but did not have authority to expend funds without the Squad’s approval.

At a Squad meeting in October 2011, the treasurer’s report revealed that the Squad’s checking account had a significant and unexplained shortage. When challenged, Morrison admitted to making unauthorized purchases, but claimed he did so for the benefit of the Squad. Morrison was suspended from his duties, and an investigation revealed that he had fraudulently signed forty-two checks for expenditures totaling $20,429.79. Some of the checks reflected potentially legitimate purchases, but an audit conducted by the Burlington County Prosecutor’s Office revealed that Morrison made purchases using Squad funds in the amount of $5,345.82 that had no justifiable basis.

Morrison was indicted on charges of third-degree theft by deception, third-degree theft by computer, third-degree wrongful impersonation, third-degree misapplication of entrusted property, and second-degree official misconduct. The trial court granted Morrison’s motion to dismiss the official-misconduct charge, holding that a volunteer EMT, who is part of a private first-aid squad that has contracted to provide services in a municipality, is not a “public servant” under N.J.S.A. 2C:30-2(a).

The Appellate Division granted the State’s motion for leave to appeal, and a divided three-member panel affirmed the judgment of the trial court in a per curiam opinion. It is strange that Judges Smonelli and Leone would issue a per curiam opinion in a case in which Judge Guadagno issued a dissenting opinion. By definition, “per curiam” opinions are supposed to involve such a straightforward application of the law and obvious conclusion that there is no need for an individual judge’s analysis. Here, the conclusion was not obvious since one judge disagreed with the other two.

The majority held that the Pemberton Rescue Squad was not exercising a governmental function sufficient “to make it the equivalent of the government in the Township.” The majority suggested, however, that a volunteer rescue squad that is the sole or predominant provider of emergency medical services in a municipality may be performing a sufficiently exclusive governmental function to make its members public servants under the official-misconduct statute. The dissenting panelist expressed the view that, because Morrison performed a governmental function, he could be charged with official misconduct.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto handled my case very well. I was happy with outcome. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend him to any of my friends or family.
David V
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a detail minded attorney that works tirelessly to get the job done right. If you need help Fred knows how to take care of your issues. Fred has years of experience and will work hard for justice for his clients. Fred is easy to talk to and has great communication skills!
Gibson H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
For the people. For the little guy My legal bully
Glennlykesmusic
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred always publishes where local DWI Checkpoints are going to be! He is also a very prominent Attorney in the Ocean County areas of Point Pleasent and Now a new Brick office!
Michael K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
The DUI checkpoint alerts have been exceptional. Much needed work to bring attention to the unconstitutional searches.
Daniel K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very knowledgeable with expungement!!! Thanks again!!!
Nicole B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Like clockwork thank you for all the info
Lee M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am writing to share my experience working with Fred From the very beginning, he provided outstanding service and demonstrated a high level of professionalism. He was attentive to my needs, communicated clearly, and always made sure I understood each step of the process. What impressed me most was his efficiency—he handled my case quickly without compromising on quality. His dedication and expertise gave me confidence and peace of mind throughout the entire process. I highly recommend Fred to anyone seeking reliable and effective legal support. His commitment to his clients and ability to deliver results promptly truly set him apart.
Aida F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Frederick is a pleasure to work with,great family guy. Fred pays attention to every detail and is totally accessible.
Tom A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Not to long ago I ran into a very serious legal issue for the first time in my life, I'm closing in on 60. Needless to say I was unsure of the process. I was fortunate that a friend recommended Fred. Fred handled my case in a professional and courteous manner yet was very down to earth and straight forward. It took nearly 9 month to resolve and during that time Fred was always available to answer questions, explain the process and most of all alleviate my stress. I feel we got the best possible outcome and I would highly recommend Fred to anyone facing a legal/criminal matter
Manny P