Firearm Purchase Permits (Part 2)

by | Aug 4, 2023 | Blog, Criminal Law, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

The Appellate Division continued in relevant part: The facts in F.M. and Cordoma are readily distinguishable from this case. Appellant has no history of domestic violence. Accordingly, the forfeiture procedure codified in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-21(d)(3) does not apply.
We also recognize that N.J.S.A. 2C:64-1(a)(1)-(2) provides for forfeiture of firearms unlawfully possessed or acquired, or used in furtherance of an unlawful activity. In addition, N.J.S.A. 2C:58-24 and -26 provide for the surrender of firearms, FPICs, HPPs, and carry permits under circumstances that “pose a significant danger of bodily injury” pursuant to “an extreme risk protective order.” Appellant’s conduct does not fall within either statute.

There is no allegation, much less evidence in the record, that appellant used his handgun in furtherance of an unlawful activity, committed an act of domestic violence, or was subject to weapon surrender under an extreme risk protective order. Nor is there any evidence that appellant improperly brandished or fired his firearms. Moreover, because appellant’s firearms were not “unlawfully possessed, carried, acquired or used,” they are not “prima facie contraband.” N.J.S.A. 2C:64-1(a)(1).

The State concedes there is no statutory authority for a court to order the seizure and compelled sale of firearms except in circumstances not present here. We concur.

The State nevertheless argues the forfeiture is moot because the 120-day period for appellant to arrange for the sale of his firearms to a licensed gun dealer expired without appellant seeking a stay or emergent relief of the trial court’s order from this court. The State notes appellant turned his firearms over to the police and speculates the guns were sold pursuant to the trial court’s order.

The State’s concession and speculation are indicative of their effort to use procedure as a weapon in a case in which the substantive law clearly undermined their actions. This is a common tactic that can only be recognized and contested through experience in handling criminal cases.

Excellent rating
Based on 287 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Thank you Fred for all your hard work and communication through my case. I got into a situation and very fortunate to have had Fred help me resolve it. He gave me great options and advice on how he would handle the situation and the steps we needed to follow. Highly satisfied with my experience and would highly recommend. Thank you Anthony Zappulla
Anthony Z
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great legal advice and services
Karen E
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great Guy, would recommend him!
Adam W
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Realmente es un gran abogado, me ayudo muchísimo en todo este proceso y sobre todo que habla español que es una de las cosas importantes para mi. Por que lo hizo mas entendible y facil cada una de las cosas que tenía que hacer y su amabilidad y paciencia para poder explicarme qué tenía que hacer. Además que mi caso fue un éxito gracias a él ya cada uno de sus conocimientos y a su apoyo en todo momento. Lo recomiendo 100%.
Luis A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very helpful services provided, updates make people think...
Atlantic A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto was a great lawyer, my outcome of my case was just how we wanted it to be. He was very good at answering phone calls and emails in a timely fashion. He was very easy to talk to and understanding of my situation. He made sure I knew all angles of the case and our best options when moving forward. I know that hiring a lawyer isnti always easy but I highly suggest Fred Sisto if you are put in the position and are in need of a lawyer.
Cory C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a very knowledgeable and effective attorney. His knowledge of the law enables him to understand your issue, plan a strategy to address it and explain the strategy to you. He also possesses excellent communication skills that assist him interactions with other attorneys and judges.
Michael G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am very appreciative of all of the time and effort Fred his given to my case. It was a pleasure having him help me. Fred always was there to answer any messages about questions or concerns. If there were any fears i had as as well, Fred is responsive and helped mitigate any anxiety I had regards to your legal matter. In terms of knowledge of the law, he can explain and elaborate everything perfectly in a manner anyone can understand so you aren't caught off guard by anything in your legal situation. Fred as your lawyer allows for transparency which is needed for you as a client because it allows you to properly fathom the situation at hand and allows Fred to help you understand realistic outcomes for your situation. As a client, that is what you want to see from your lawyer so they clearly have your best interests at hand. That is a great attribute Fred has. Lastly, Fred helped me get everything dropped. I would recommend Fred because hes personable, his expertise, his array of legal knowledge, his legal experience and background, and he contains attributes you need in a lawyer to get you the best outcome.
Matthew F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Nice to know where to avoid,I drive a taxi and can save time if I know where they are because they tie up traffic.
John M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Best criminal defense lawyer in ocean county!!
Austin A