Judgment of Acquittal Standard (Part 8)

by | Dec 17, 2021 | Blog, Criminal Law, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

Justice Albin dissented. The dissent expressed the view that the direct and inferential evidence — viewed in the light most favorable to the State — cannot rationally justify the murder conviction of Michelle Lodzinski. Noting that a murder conviction cannot rest on speculation, Justice Albin writes that the sustaining of the conviction in this case on such a paucity of evidence has no parallel in this state. Justice Albin also points out that Lodzinski’s status as a single working mother was not a motive for murder and that, among other factors casting doubt on the identification of the blanket, Lodzinski’s estranged niece identified the blanket after first collaborating with the police.

Justice Albin writes that there is no evidence of how Timothy Wiltsey died or the circumstances of his death. Even if the evidence suggests that Lodzinski had some knowledge or even involvement in Timothy’s death, Justice Albin observes, there is absolutely no evidence that she purposely or knowingly caused his death, and there is no evidence to distinguish whether Timothy died by accident or by the negligent, reckless, or purposeful or knowing acts of a person — even if that person were Lodzinski. Justice Albin notes that not even the State’s medical examiner, in opining on the manner of death, distinguished between negligent, reckless, and purposeful or knowing homicide.

Justice Albin stresses that due process requires that the State establish beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offense, including the accused’s state of mind, which is an essential element necessary to support a murder conviction. The Appellate Division’s judgment upholding defendant’s conviction is upheld by an equally divided Court, and the Court unanimously modifies the Appellate Division’s holding as to the standard of review on a post-verdict motion for a judgment of acquittal. Justices LaVecchia and Pierre-Louis joined in Justice Albin’s dissent.

Justice Albin was an assistant trial prosecutor in Middlesex County. He began his legal career as a prosecutor in the appellate section of the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
My boyfriend used Fred Sisto twice and had nothing but positive results. Fred was professional, courteous, and punctual. His office was also very attentive and understanding when he had to speak with them regarding his case. I would recommend using Fred to anyone in the monmouth or ocean county region if they had any criminal case regarding the possession of marijuana
C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
....and his Dog Gonzo is a great attorney.
Duane H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am writing to share my experience working with Fred From the very beginning, he provided outstanding service and demonstrated a high level of professionalism. He was attentive to my needs, communicated clearly, and always made sure I understood each step of the process. What impressed me most was his efficiency—he handled my case quickly without compromising on quality. His dedication and expertise gave me confidence and peace of mind throughout the entire process. I highly recommend Fred to anyone seeking reliable and effective legal support. His commitment to his clients and ability to deliver results promptly truly set him apart.
Aida F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am thankful and fortunate to have had Fred represent me as counsel. His expertise, responsiveness and professionalism are second to none. I was more than satisfied with the outcome of my case and the level of service Fred's practice provided.
John M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Excellent advice. Clam and accretive. Handled my case professionally and efficiently. Thank you for the great service. -D.
Danni K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
My charges were dismissed and he quickly got an expungement for me. He's worth way more than what I paid for. I will always be grateful. He never missed a single call, text or email from me. He also keeps me informed of all checkpoints
Bre D
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very professional, always available to answer any questions I had. Plus, I didn't lose my license all thanks to him. Great lawyer overall
David B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is knowledgeable and he has great working relationships with the courts. He HONESTLY is seeking the best deal for you he is not all about the money!! Thanks Fred you saved me BIG TIME!!
Casey B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very good
Nazario B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto handled my case very well. I was happy with outcome. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend him to any of my friends or family.
David V