Judgment of Acquittal Standard (Part 8)

by | Dec 17, 2021 | Blog, Criminal Law, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

Justice Albin dissented. The dissent expressed the view that the direct and inferential evidence — viewed in the light most favorable to the State — cannot rationally justify the murder conviction of Michelle Lodzinski. Noting that a murder conviction cannot rest on speculation, Justice Albin writes that the sustaining of the conviction in this case on such a paucity of evidence has no parallel in this state. Justice Albin also points out that Lodzinski’s status as a single working mother was not a motive for murder and that, among other factors casting doubt on the identification of the blanket, Lodzinski’s estranged niece identified the blanket after first collaborating with the police.

Justice Albin writes that there is no evidence of how Timothy Wiltsey died or the circumstances of his death. Even if the evidence suggests that Lodzinski had some knowledge or even involvement in Timothy’s death, Justice Albin observes, there is absolutely no evidence that she purposely or knowingly caused his death, and there is no evidence to distinguish whether Timothy died by accident or by the negligent, reckless, or purposeful or knowing acts of a person — even if that person were Lodzinski. Justice Albin notes that not even the State’s medical examiner, in opining on the manner of death, distinguished between negligent, reckless, and purposeful or knowing homicide.

Justice Albin stresses that due process requires that the State establish beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offense, including the accused’s state of mind, which is an essential element necessary to support a murder conviction. The Appellate Division’s judgment upholding defendant’s conviction is upheld by an equally divided Court, and the Court unanimously modifies the Appellate Division’s holding as to the standard of review on a post-verdict motion for a judgment of acquittal. Justices LaVecchia and Pierre-Louis joined in Justice Albin’s dissent.

Justice Albin was an assistant trial prosecutor in Middlesex County. He began his legal career as a prosecutor in the appellate section of the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr Sisto is an excellent lawyer. The tickets I received were nothing compared to the charges i had originally. I got the best possible outcome for my case, and Mr Sisto was incredibly understanding and patient and responded to any questions I had within about 30 minutes of me asking them. I'll be going to him again for any legal trouble I have in the future
Brandon K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
mr. fred sisto esq. was very professional, answered all questions i had, & made my husband & i feel more at ease about our criminal case.
Meridith T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred never represented me but been in touch with him a few times and was a very professional experience from the minute I called the office
Jj B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a very competent attorney. He is knowledgeable, thorough, effective and possesses outstanding interpersonal skills. He provided excellent representation in my case and obtained a favorable outcome.
Michael G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto's attention to detail, his representation and unwavering advocacy for me made all the difference in my case.
Jill F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Hired Mr.Sisto to handle a case of mine a couple of months ago and while the service was okay the customer service was awful. When I had inquired about a charge I was unsure of on my bill, Mr. Sisto immediately got defensive and had the unprofessionalism to ask me if I “was high” for asking this question. I wonder if Mr. Sisto asks all of his clients this question or only the ones who have jobs in the cannabis industry? Regardless, I don’t believe this was an appropriate question to ask, regardless of the industry one works in, and therefore Mr. Sisto needs to heavily work on his customer service. Edit: Mr. Sisto had the UNPROFESSIONALISM to reach out to my family and ask them to ask me to take down my review instead of reaching out directly towards me when it was I who was his client, not my family. Clearly speaks to the unprofessionalism surrounding this practice. This has not been the only time Mr.Sisto has gone directly to my family instead of me, his client, for important legal matters and I will not seek out his services again. For those who may not understand Spanish, the email starts with “You should speak to your daughter regarding the review she has just published.” Edit to Response: As an attorney, one should be able to make appropriate questions and comments regardless if a client is “uncooperative” or “disrespectful.” The fact that rather than apologizing for the awful interaction with your firm, and I was not released “within hours” as you claim shows how low value your firm is and how you openly instead chose to harass my family through email for my initial review rather than actually revomy case which I ended up doing and you chareged me for . Regardless of results, your character speaks volumes and anyone who reads this would know better than to give their money to an awful person such as yourself. What a shame
Ximena C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto was knowledgeable preofessional and experienced. He knew the right steps to take every step of the way and went above and beyond to make sure that I understood the situation. Mr. Sisto will have your back in any legal matter!
Corey S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
2 👍🏻👍🏻 up
Cc
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very informative. Would not hesitate to use Attorney Sisto.
Rose C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Realmente es un gran abogado, me ayudo muchísimo en todo este proceso y sobre todo que habla español que es una de las cosas importantes para mi. Por que lo hizo mas entendible y facil cada una de las cosas que tenía que hacer y su amabilidad y paciencia para poder explicarme qué tenía que hacer. Además que mi caso fue un éxito gracias a él ya cada uno de sus conocimientos y a su apoyo en todo momento. Lo recomiendo 100%.
Luis A