Locations Where Smoking Medical Marijuana is Prohibited

by | Jun 17, 2016 | Blog, Criminal Law, Drug Crime, Marijuana

Weed Criminal Lawyer Ocean CountyCitizens of New Jersey that have been prescribed medical marijuana (and have registered with the State) still have to abide by specific rules and regulations regarding where the drug can be utilized.  If the patient consumes the drug orally, then there are no restrictions about where he/she can use the drug.  However, if the patient is smoking marijuana, there are certain places where the drug may not be utilized.  The prohibited locations mentioned in CUMMA are:

  • In a school bus or other form of public transportation.
  • On school grounds.
  • In a correctional facility.
  • In a public park.
  • At a beach.
  • At a recreation center.
  • In any place where smoking is prohibited.

If a patient is found smoking marijuana at any of the above locations, the CUMMA affirmative defense cannot be applied.  To see the full section of CUMMA regarding this topic, please see below.

 

2.4 Smoking Marijuana in Prohibited Locations

CUMMA expressly provides that it does NOT authorize a person to smoke marijuana “in a school bus or other form of public transportation, in a private vehicle unless the vehicle is not in operation, or on any school grounds, in any correctional facility, at any public park or beach, or at any recreation center, or any place where smoking is prohibited pursuant to N.J.S. 2C:33-13.”7 N.J.S.A. 24:61-8(b). As to smoking medical marijuana at such protected locations, CUMMA expressly provides that the patient “shall be subject to such penalties as are provided by law.” Id. In other words, when smoking occurs at a protected location, the CUMMA affirmative defense would be inapplicable, and the offender could be charged and convicted with a marijuana use/being under the influence offense, notwithstanding that the defendant is a qualifying patient and notwithstanding that the marijuana that was smoked had been lawfully dispensed to the patient.

Note that this provision of CUMMA applies only to smoking marijuana in certain specified places, and thus does not prohibit a person from orally consuming or being under the influence of medical marijuana while at any of the protected locations. (Of course, as explained in Section 2.3, it remains unauthorized and illegal for a patient to use or be under the influence of medical marijuana while operating a vehicle, vessel, or certain heavy equipment, regardless of the method of ingestion.)

It should be noted that CUMMA does not prohibit a qualifying patient from smoking in a private vehicle while the vehicle is not in operation. See N.J.S.A. 24:61-S(b). CJ , Section 2.3 (discussing the operation of vehicles, vessels, and heavy equipment, and requiring a thorough investigation to ensure public safety by determining whether a vehicle operator may be under the influence of marijuana). However, CUMMA makes clear that it does not allow a patient to smoke medical marijuana in a school bus or other form of public transportation regardless of whether such vehicle was in operation at the time that the medical marijuana was smoked.

It should also be noted that CUMMA only prohibits qualifying patients from smoking lawfully-dispensed medical marijuana at the specific protected locations listed above. It does not prohibit patients from smoking medical marijuana at other locations.

If a qualifying patient were to smoke medical marijuana while at any of the above-listed protected locations, the CUMMA affirmative defense would not apply to the charge of using a controlled dangerous substance in violation of subsection (b) of N.J.S.A. 2C:35-10. As noted in Section 2.3, N.J.S.A. 24:61-6 expressly provides that the affirmative defense set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:35-18 applies to a qualifying patient who is “acting in accordance with the provisions of this act [CUMMA].” By smoking marijuana at a prohibited location in direct contravention of N.J.S.A. 24:61-8, the defendant would be acting outside of the legal protections afforded to him or her by CUMMA, and thus could be charged and prosecuted for unlawful marijuana use, notwithstanding that he or she is allowed to smoke lawfully-dispensed medical marijuana at other locations.

Although a qualifying patient who smokes at a prohibited location may properly be charged and prosecuted for using marijuana in violation of subsection (b) of N.J.S.A. 2C:35-10, he or she may still be able to successfully assert a CUMMA affirmative defense if he or she were also to be charged with the actual or constructive possession of marijuana in violation of subsection (a) of N.J.S.A. 2C:35-l 0. To the extent that the CUMMA affirmative defense may apply to the unconsumed medical marijuana present at the prohibited location, that marijuana or associated paraphernalia should not be treated as contraband per se, and, pursuant to the general policy set forth in these Guidelines, a police officer should ordinarily refrain from seizing such medical marijuana or paraphernalia.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto was not only a knowledgeable and excellent lawyer, he was compassionate and understanding during this difficult time. I found Mr. Sisto to always be available and he services were affordable and effective. You will not find a better lawyer.
Joseph S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Estoy realmente satisfecho con el excelente trabajo que hizo el abogo en mi caso de DIU. Agradecido por que el caso fue un éxito, ya que además tiene mucho conocimiento en estos casos y no dudo que en otros casos también. Lo recomiendo totalmente.
Luis A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
For the people. For the little guy My legal bully
Glennlykesmusic
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great location
John G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Current Pre law students and I had a question pertaining to a certain scenario in class. He responded back and gave me a case that broke down exactly what I asked for.
Chad T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very knowledgeable with expungement!!! Thanks again!!!
Nicole B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Called back within 10 minutes,very easy to talk to. Not judgmental at all. I am hopeful about the outcome.
Colleen H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
On time and on point. Very knowledgeable
Ron T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto and his entire staff were courteous, professional and got our case handled quickly and to the best outcome. Great lawyer. Highly recommend.
Bryan B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am writing to share my experience working with Fred From the very beginning, he provided outstanding service and demonstrated a high level of professionalism. He was attentive to my needs, communicated clearly, and always made sure I understood each step of the process. What impressed me most was his efficiency—he handled my case quickly without compromising on quality. His dedication and expertise gave me confidence and peace of mind throughout the entire process. I highly recommend Fred to anyone seeking reliable and effective legal support. His commitment to his clients and ability to deliver results promptly truly set him apart.
Aida F