Megan’s Law Termination (Part 1)

by | Jun 1, 2020 | Blog, Criminal Law, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

On March 17, 2020, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided the Essex County case of In the Matter of Registrant H.D. The principal issue under N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2 involved the circumstances in which a sex offender can be forever barred from seeking termination of Megan’s Law requirements.

Justice Solomon wrote for the Court in relevant part: Reading subsection (f) as part of N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2, we find its language unambiguous. It plainly refers to the conviction or release that triggers the registration requirement established in subsection (b) and detailed in subsection (c). The mechanism for registration relief set forth in subsection (f) is linked both by logic and by language to the initial mandate of registration which stems from a conviction for certain offenses. See N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(b)(1) to (3). Aside from those required to register on the basis of a conviction that predates the effective date of Megan’s Law, N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(c)(4), the mandate commences upon conviction of a predicate offense for those “under supervision in the community on probation, parole, furlough, work release, or a similar program,” N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(c)(1), or upon release from confinement, N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(c)(2). Like subsection (c), subsection (f) begins with a reference to individuals “required to register under this act,” and reuses the terms “conviction” and “release” that start the registration process under subsection (c). In doing so, the Legislature tethered the registration relief offered in subsection (f) to the same underlying sex offense that marked the starting point of the registration requirement.

The registrants’ reliance on the word “any” is misplaced. N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2 applies to a variety of sex offenses, and sentences upon conviction for Megan’s Law offenses vary from supervised release to confinement in a correctional facility. See N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2(c)(1) to (2). “Any” also acknowledges that not all sentences of imprisonment will be the same and makes it clear that the fifteen-year clock will not start until release, no matter how long or short the period of imprisonment. The word thus has meaning within the context of N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2 If the statute read “within 15 years following any conviction or release,” the registrants might have a stronger argument.

“Release” from prison starts the clock because it is rare for inmates to be convicted of criminal offenses while incarcerated. While crimes occur all the time in the prison system, assaults that do not result in serious bodily injury tend to be punished with administrative sanctions as opposed to criminal charges.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Thank you very much for your information on DUI check points. It is a great asset to the community . 5 stars for sure!
James P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
....and his Dog Gonzo is a great attorney.
Duane H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a good lawyer, he is really young yet made me feel confident that my lawful rights were being protected, and investigated all avenues when there was potential they weren't. He is very knowledgeable, and offered great peace of mind in such a distressing situation. I always felt like he had my back throughout the whole process, supporting aspects to my case that didn't even fall within his scope. I would highly recommend Fred.
Amy L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Today my life was about to change! With great communication and excellent service he was able to create the impossible!! I am now able to continue to drive for a living!! I highly recommend his services and trust his judgment-HE KNOWS HIS STUFF!!! He saved my life and livelihood today! Mr.Frank Sisto is an absolutely amazing attorney! Thank you again I’ll never forget this day! God Bless
Edward J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Me Sisto went above and beyond for my case I couldn’t be happier with the outcome. If you’re looking for someone to represent you Mr Sisto will knock it out of the park for you. Thank you Thank you Thank You!
Tony L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was extremely helpful and knowledgable. He made the whole process as painless and easy as possible.
Toli C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very professional and knowledgeable, also awesome communication and very down to earth guy. Would highly recommend to anyone. Matter was resolved with the best possible outcome that I could've hoped.
Mike A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great information sharing.
Phil S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Professional, knowledgeable and responsive. I would highly recommend Fritz to any friend or family members.
William S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Thanks for sharing this information.
Joe F