Municipal Court Diversion Programs (Part 2)

by | Jan 30, 2016 | Blog, Criminal Law, News

2C:43-13.1. Eligibility and Application. a. Eligibility and Application. Whenever any defendant who has not been previously convicted of any petty disorderly persons offense, disorderly persons offense or crime under any law of the United States, this State or any other state, and who has not previously participated in conditional discharge under N.J.S.2C:36A-1, supervisory treatment under N.J.S.2C:43-12, or conditional dismissal under P.L.2013, c.158 (C.2C:43-13.1 et al.), is charged with a petty disorderly offense or disorderly persons offense except as provided in subsection b. of this section, the defendant may, after a plea of guilty or a finding of guilt, but prior to the entry of a judgment of conviction and with appropriate notice to the prosecutor, apply to the court for entry into the conditional dismissal program pursuant to the requirements of P.L.2013, c.158 (C.2C:43-13.1 et al.). As a condition of such application, the defendant shall submit to the fingerprint identification procedures as provided in R.S.53:1-15 before making such application to the court to allow sufficient time for verification of the defendant’s criminal history by the prosecutor.

Paragraph (a) addresses the required guilty plea that is a pre-condition to the conditional dismissal program. Note that the program is also available to defendants after they are found guilty at trial. Thus, it would appear that defendants interested in the program would have nothing to lose by going to trial and giving themselves a shot at a “not guilty” finding and dismissal. However, as a practical matter, demanding a trial will almost always lead to additional court dates, time spent waiting at court, and additional legal fees incurred while the state delays in presenting their case. These delays are sometimes caused by unforeseeable issues with witness availability or a court’s busy calendar. More often, the delays are intentionally used by the state with the hope that a defendant will get tired of spending their time and money and will agree to a disposition that does not require the state to conduct a trial. Additionally, courts are vested with some discretion regarding who can participate in the program. There are some judges that would use this discretion to keep a defendant out of the program if the defendant forced the court and state to conduct a trial in a case in which the court found the proofs of the offense(s) to be very strong. This use/abuse of discretion is commonly referred to as a “trial tax”.

Note that the conditional dismissal program is also more restrictive of who can participate with regard to prior records of convictions. The conditional discharge program is available to anyone who has not been convicted of a drug offense (and who has not already participated in a diversionary program). A conviction for any petty disorderly persons or disorderly persons offenses, whether or not the offense is drug-related, is a bar to the conditional dismissal program.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto was not only a knowledgeable and excellent lawyer, he was compassionate and understanding during this difficult time. I found Mr. Sisto to always be available and he services were affordable and effective. You will not find a better lawyer.
Joseph S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Estoy realmente satisfecho con el excelente trabajo que hizo el abogo en mi caso de DIU. Agradecido por que el caso fue un éxito, ya que además tiene mucho conocimiento en estos casos y no dudo que en otros casos también. Lo recomiendo totalmente.
Luis A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
For the people. For the little guy My legal bully
Glennlykesmusic
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great location
John G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Current Pre law students and I had a question pertaining to a certain scenario in class. He responded back and gave me a case that broke down exactly what I asked for.
Chad T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very knowledgeable with expungement!!! Thanks again!!!
Nicole B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Called back within 10 minutes,very easy to talk to. Not judgmental at all. I am hopeful about the outcome.
Colleen H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
On time and on point. Very knowledgeable
Ron T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto and his entire staff were courteous, professional and got our case handled quickly and to the best outcome. Great lawyer. Highly recommend.
Bryan B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am writing to share my experience working with Fred From the very beginning, he provided outstanding service and demonstrated a high level of professionalism. He was attentive to my needs, communicated clearly, and always made sure I understood each step of the process. What impressed me most was his efficiency—he handled my case quickly without compromising on quality. His dedication and expertise gave me confidence and peace of mind throughout the entire process. I highly recommend Fred to anyone seeking reliable and effective legal support. His commitment to his clients and ability to deliver results promptly truly set him apart.
Aida F