Municipal Court Diversion Programs (Part 2)

by | Jan 30, 2016 | Blog, Criminal Law, News

2C:43-13.1. Eligibility and Application. a. Eligibility and Application. Whenever any defendant who has not been previously convicted of any petty disorderly persons offense, disorderly persons offense or crime under any law of the United States, this State or any other state, and who has not previously participated in conditional discharge under N.J.S.2C:36A-1, supervisory treatment under N.J.S.2C:43-12, or conditional dismissal under P.L.2013, c.158 (C.2C:43-13.1 et al.), is charged with a petty disorderly offense or disorderly persons offense except as provided in subsection b. of this section, the defendant may, after a plea of guilty or a finding of guilt, but prior to the entry of a judgment of conviction and with appropriate notice to the prosecutor, apply to the court for entry into the conditional dismissal program pursuant to the requirements of P.L.2013, c.158 (C.2C:43-13.1 et al.). As a condition of such application, the defendant shall submit to the fingerprint identification procedures as provided in R.S.53:1-15 before making such application to the court to allow sufficient time for verification of the defendant’s criminal history by the prosecutor.

Paragraph (a) addresses the required guilty plea that is a pre-condition to the conditional dismissal program. Note that the program is also available to defendants after they are found guilty at trial. Thus, it would appear that defendants interested in the program would have nothing to lose by going to trial and giving themselves a shot at a “not guilty” finding and dismissal. However, as a practical matter, demanding a trial will almost always lead to additional court dates, time spent waiting at court, and additional legal fees incurred while the state delays in presenting their case. These delays are sometimes caused by unforeseeable issues with witness availability or a court’s busy calendar. More often, the delays are intentionally used by the state with the hope that a defendant will get tired of spending their time and money and will agree to a disposition that does not require the state to conduct a trial. Additionally, courts are vested with some discretion regarding who can participate in the program. There are some judges that would use this discretion to keep a defendant out of the program if the defendant forced the court and state to conduct a trial in a case in which the court found the proofs of the offense(s) to be very strong. This use/abuse of discretion is commonly referred to as a “trial tax”.

Note that the conditional dismissal program is also more restrictive of who can participate with regard to prior records of convictions. The conditional discharge program is available to anyone who has not been convicted of a drug offense (and who has not already participated in a diversionary program). A conviction for any petty disorderly persons or disorderly persons offenses, whether or not the offense is drug-related, is a bar to the conditional dismissal program.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Have been very happy to share checkpoint info with friends so they can be safe and sober drivers. Thanks for a great community effort
Ron T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Antes que todo le doy las gracias señor Frederick P Sisto por representarme legalmente es usted un excelente abogado que habla con la verdad desde el principio es usted un abogado profesional que que sabe bien lo que hace ante los juzgados sin importar mi estatus legal en este país me represento con respeto y sobre todo muy profesionalmente y pudo hacer q bajaran mi delito de segundo grado a tercer grado y lo mejor que no permitió que me dieran tempo en carcel mi familia y yo estamos muy agradecidos con usted Puedo recomendar al señor abogado Frederick P Sisto como un excelente abogado y sin duda COMO UNO DE LOS MEJORES DEL ESTADO DE NEW JERSEY First of all I thank you Mister Frederick P Sisto for representing me legally you're an excellent lawyer who speaks to the truth from the beginning you are a professional lawyer who knows well what you do before the courts regardless of my legal status in this P Country I represent with respect and especially very professionally and could make Q lower my second-degree offense to third grade and the best I did not allow me to give tempo in jail my family and I are very grateful to you I can recommend Mr. Freder Attorney Ick P Sisto as an excellent lawyer and certainly as one of the best in the state of NEW JERSEY
Raul F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is a great attorney. Highly recommend. He is very trustworthy, professional, and has great communication skills, one being that he is very down to earth and makes you feel comfortable in all possibilities. I am very happy I went with him to represent me, we received the best possible outcome for our matter, while he was honest with all possibilities along the way.
Mike A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great information sharing.
Phil S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was very professional, competent, and a pleasure to deal with I cant thank him enough I highly recommend his services
Mildred T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto was a great lawyer, my outcome of my case was just how we wanted it to be. He was very good at answering phone calls and emails in a timely fashion. He was very easy to talk to and understanding of my situation. He made sure I knew all angles of the case and our best options when moving forward. I know that hiring a lawyer isnti always easy but I highly suggest Fred Sisto if you are put in the position and are in need of a lawyer.
Cory C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Worst Attorney I have ever encountered he will WASTE your time and steal your MONEY. Don't RECOMMEND!
Patric W
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Love his warnings of dwi checkpoints. Nothing but constitutionally illegal money makers.
Honkeytonk J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I highly recommend Fred. He is very knowledgeable and will look out for your interest. I am happy with the outcome of my case. I hope I don’t have to use his services again but if I did I will definitely use him again. He also has a great personality and is very personable. That’s always a plus!
Mohammad J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto was not only a knowledgeable and excellent lawyer, he was compassionate and understanding during this difficult time. I found Mr. Sisto to always be available and he services were affordable and effective. You will not find a better lawyer.
Joseph S