PCR and Withheld Evidence (Part 7)

by | Oct 13, 2021 | Blog, Criminal Law, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

Justice Albin continued in relevant part: In a criminal case, the accused is guaranteed the effective assistance of counsel by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-85 (1984), and Article I, Paragraph 10 of the New Jersey Constitution, State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42, 58 (1987). The test for determining whether counsel failed to provide the effective assistance required by the Federal and State Constitutions is set forth in Strickland and Fritz: first, a defendant must demonstrate that counsel’s representation was deficient — that counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness — and second, he must show a reasonable probability that the result of the proceeding would have been different but for counsel’s deficiencies.

A defendant has a constitutional right to present a complete defense, including the right to introduce evidence of third-party guilt. In this case, defense counsel’s trial strategy was to advance an effective and credible third-party-guilt defense that Thomas — not Hannah — committed the crime. The success of that trial strategy required counsel merely to raise a reasonable doubt about Hannah’s guilt. Third-party-guilt evidence is admissible so long as the proof offered has a rational tendency to engender a reasonable doubt with respect to an essential feature of the State’s case, and third-party statements against penal interest are generally admissible where the proffered evidence draws a direct connection between the third party and the commission of the crime.

Hannah was both fortunate to have belatedly received his entire case file and to have had a PCR attorney that thoroughly reviewed a voluminous and complicated record. But for the loss of the first file during a prison lockdown, he would have never been privy to the Redd report. But for his fourth PCR attorney’s highlighting a key finding by the third PCR judge, he would not have had the ammunition required to convince a slim 4-3 majority of the Court to overturn his conviction and grant a new trial.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am thankful and fortunate to have had Fred represent me as counsel. His expertise, responsiveness and professionalism are second to none. I was more than satisfied with the outcome of my case and the level of service Fred's practice provided.
John M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Quick response to phone calls and emails. Answered all my questions knowledgeably. And represented us very well in the courtroom. Thank you again.
Julie F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Knowledgeable and reasonable attorney who gets things done. You will not be disappointed.
1093Nj
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred completely exceeded all expectations with the result of my case.
John M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
My son was represented better than I could have ever imagined. His needs were put first and was treated as a friend rather than a number. His/ our opinions were valued and our doubts were always reassured. We couldn’t have asked for a better attorney out there!!! Thanks so much!
Danielle T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Iv had good lawyers defend me before but Mr.Sisto is beyond the best iv had. He explains everything every step of the way until your court date and excels on getting results , I defenatly recomend his services.
Imer J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
That’s my lawyer he’s the greatest
Donald J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I like getting the DUI checkpoint alerts from Fred’s office. I’m not much of a drinker but I like to avoid the hassles of checkpoints. Thanks Fred
Denise M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
mr. fred sisto esq. was very professional, answered all questions i had, & made my husband & i feel more at ease about our criminal case.
Meridith T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Excellent advice. Clam and accretive. Handled my case professionally and efficiently. Thank you for the great service. -D.
Danni K