Possession of a Weapon and Consecutive Sentences (Part 2)

by Fred Sisto | Oct 29, 2019 | Blog, Criminal Law, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County, Weapons Charge

Justice Patterson continued in relevant part: The court determined that the crimes committed by defendant on February 28, 2011, March 3, 2011, and March 29, 2011 were “independent of each other,” their objectives on each date “involved separate acts of violence or threats of violence,” and “they were committed at different times and places.”

The evidence supported the court’s findings that the crimes committed in each criminal episode were independent of one another, that the objectives of those crimes were distinct from one another, that they involved separate acts of violence or threats of violence, and that they were committed at different times and in different locations. See State v. Cassady (2009) (upholding the imposition of consecutive sentences based on the trial court’s determination that the criminal episodes were independent of one another and stressing that “the sentencing court faithfully paired the Yarbough factors with the facts as found by the jury”); State v. Ghertler (1989) (reviewing the reasons advanced in imposing consecutive sentences and holding that “the court’s exercise of discretion to impose consecutive sentences was supported by a separate statement of reasons”).

The court’s analysis upon imposing a consecutive sentence for the first-degree kidnapping of the fourteen-year-old victim during the February 28, 2011 incident also satisfied Yarbough. That sentence was made consecutive to the sentences for the other first-degree kidnappings and other crimes defendant committed during that incident. As the trial court found, the child and her sister were kidnapped approximately one hour before the first-degree kidnapping of her father and the third-degree criminal restraint of her mother. It was clearly within the trial court’s discretion to impose a sentence for her kidnapping that was consecutive to defendant’s sentence for the other crimes committed on that date.

Here, the Court strains to apply weight to the “separate incident” factor. It also double counts the “separate victim” factor, at least in part.

      Excellent rating  
 Based on 288 reviews 
    
  
 
 
      Fred was incredibly helpful during a very stressful time. Even during a pandemic he was fast at responding to any and all questions or problems that I had. He went above and beyond to make sure that I was happy with my results and that my case was being handled properly all the way through. Highly recommend this office!
     Toni V 
 
 
 
 
    Muy buen abogado lo rrecomiendo!!
     Victor N 
 
 
 
 
    Iv had good lawyers defend me before but Mr.Sisto is beyond the best iv had. He explains everything every step of the way until your court date and excels on getting results , I defenatly recomend his services.
     Imer J 
 
 
 
 
    Fred was extremely helpful and knowledgable. He made the whole process as painless and easy as possible.
     Toli C 
 
 
 
 
    Today my life was about to change! With great communication and excellent service he was able to create the impossible!! I am now able to continue to drive for a living!! I highly recommend his services and trust his judgment-HE KNOWS HIS STUFF!!! He saved my life and livelihood today! Mr.Frank Sisto is an absolutely amazing attorney! Thank you again I’ll never forget this day! God Bless
     Edward J 
 
 
 
 
    Fred is a fantastic attorney who is very informative, knows the system well, and is very thorough.
     Bob V 
 
 
 
 
    Fred Sisto's attention to detail, his representation and unwavering advocacy for me made all the difference in my case.
     Jill F 
 
 
 
 
    Fred is an excellent attorney. Even though we did not initiate the official pleading process, he deep dived into researching and sorted out my questions without any consultation fee. I highly recommend him!
     Qianru Z 
 
 
 
 
    I have sought out Mr. Sisto for two traffic related cases. His hard work and dedication to getting results for me was very evident from the get go. He was very informative throughout the entire process of working on my cases and during the court sessions as well. Very professional and very friendly. If anyone in the area is looking for a very good and quality representation, Mr. Sisto is a go to.
     Brett S 
 
 
 
 
    Fred Sisto is a professional, knowledgeable, and exceptional attorney.  He is very responsive and maintains continuous contact with his clients via phone and email. Fred made sure that we understood the charges and was able to work on getting us the best outcome possible.  He even went above and beyond in the court room by assisting with translation from English to Spanish.  I highly recommend him to anyone who is in need of legal services and representation.  In the future if needed I would definitely use him again as an attorney.
     Sara A