Fred Sisto | Criminal Attorney | Ocean and Monmouth County

Call Us Today
732-898-3232

  • Home
  • Criminal Defense Services
    ▼
    • Drug Crimes
      ▼
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Intent to Distribute Narcotics
      • Prescription Drug Crimes
      • Leader of Narcotics Trafficking Network
    • Weapons Charges
      ▼
      • Prohibited Weapons and Devices
      • Manufacture, Transport, etc. of Weapons
      • Illegal Possession of a Gun
      • Possession of Weapons for Unlawful Purposes
    • Expungements
    • Theft Attorney
    • Violent Crimes
      ▼
      • Robbery/Burglary
      • Manslaughter
      • Extortion
      • Assault
      • Sexual Offenses
    • Arson
    • DUI / DWI
      ▼
      • Alcohol DUI
      • Drug DUI
      • Refusing a Breath Test
    • Driving with A Suspended License
    • Property Forfeiture
    • Anti-Drug Profiteering
    • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Español / Spanish Speaking Attorney
  • About
    ▼
    • Testimonials
    • Defending Cases In
      ▼
      • Monmouth County
      • Ocean County
  • Blog
  • Contact
    ▼
    • Receive a Call From Fred
  • DUI Checkpoint Alerts
  • Results
  • Payment Options
  • Home
  • Criminal Defense Services
    • Drug Crimes
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Intent to Distribute Narcotics
      • Prescription Drug Crimes
      • Leader of Narcotics Trafficking Network
    • Weapons Charges
      • Prohibited Weapons and Devices
      • Manufacture, Transport, etc. of Weapons
      • Illegal Possession of a Gun
      • Possession of Weapons for Unlawful Purposes
    • Expungements
    • Theft Attorney
    • Violent Crimes
      • Robbery/Burglary
      • Manslaughter
      • Extortion
      • Assault
      • Sexual Offenses
    • Arson
    • DUI / DWI
      • Alcohol DUI
      • Drug DUI
      • Refusing a Breath Test
    • Driving with A Suspended License
    • Property Forfeiture
    • Anti-Drug Profiteering
    • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Español / Spanish Speaking Attorney
  • About
    • Testimonials
    • Defending Cases In
      • Monmouth County
      • Ocean County
  • Blog
  • Contact
    • Receive a Call From Fred
  • DUI Checkpoint Alerts
  • Results
  • Payment Options
Home >> PTI and Mental Illness (Part 2)

May 31, 2022 by Fred Sisto

PTI and Mental Illness (Part 2)

The Court concluded with the following in relevant part: Here, like the defendant in Fitzsimmons, defendant argued she made substantial progress toward rehabilitation after the May 2018 incidents. Further, she represented she was compliant with her mental health treatment. Moreover, the motion judge remarked at argument that defendant “seemed to be stabilized” and had not “picked up any new offenses.” Yet the record does not demonstrate how defendant’s efforts to rehabilitate herself and her progress in treatment factored into the State’s decision to deny her PTI application. As we have noted, when the State fails to adequately explain its reasoning for how it has assessed the relevant statutory factors, as it did here, a remand is warranted. See State v. Mickens (App. Div. 1989).

Given the passage of time, the State’s review of defendant’s PTI application should be conducted anew, and its assessment must include not only consideration of defendant’s mental health issues and ongoing treatment, if any, but also a more robust explanation of its evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:43-12(e). Similarly, considering how much time has passed since the State last considered defendant’s PTI application, she must be afforded the opportunity to supply the State with any current information bearing on her application. See State v. Coursey (App. Div. 2016). Once the State has considered defendant’s updated application, it shall advise the judge if it still opposes defendant’s entry into PTI. We are confident the judge, informed by defendant’s behavior while on probation for well over two years, at that point will be in a superior position to assess whether the State has properly considered defendant’s suitability for PTI. Should the State again reject defendant from PTI and the judge finds such a determination constitutes a patent and gross abuse of its discretion, we order the judge to vacate defendant’s convictions and enter an order admitting defendant into PTI. We leave it to the court’s discretion to determine if defendant should receive credit for time spent on probation in determining the length of defendant’s required participation in the program. On the other hand, if the prosecutor still opposes her admission, and the judge affirms the prosecutor’s decision, defendant’s judgments of conviction shall stand.

This litigation could have been avoided if the State listed the positive factors bearing on the defendant’s PTI admission and noted that those factors were considered in rejecting the PTI application. Prosecutors tend to be complacent with their PTIOI rejection reasoning because the standard to overcome a rejection is so high.

Filed Under: Blog, Criminal Law, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

Testimonials

Fred is a stickler for detail and communicates with clients very, very well. He is smart and astute. I would recommend him unconditionally.

Tom O   

I would highly recommend Mr. Sisto. He is very insightful and proficient, yet still down to Earth. Fred is great at communicating and breaking down the facts. But most importantly, he excels at getting results.

Bill K   

Thanks to Fred I have no criminal record whatsoever.

Luke A   

Great!!! , got my case handled in the exact manner that I was told and would recommend to everyone else in need of legal representation.

Raumelis R   
See More Testimonials

Recent Posts

  • Permits to Carry and Sensitive Places (Part 36)
  • Permits to Carry and Sensitive Places (Part 35)
  • Permits to Carry and Sensitive Places (Part 34)
  • Permits to Carry and Sensitive Places (Part 33)
  • Permits to Carry and Sensitive Places (Part 32)
  • Permits to Carry and Sensitive Places (Part 31)
  • Permits to Carry and Sensitive Places (Part 30)
  • Permits to Carry and Sensitive Places (Part 29)

Recent Speaking Engagement

Site Disclaimer

Attorney Referral Fees

Frederick P Sisto has earned Lawyer Legion's recognition for Community Leadership
 
Top Criminal Defense Attorney in Brick

Law Office of Frederick P. Sisto

Point Pleasant Office*:
302 Hawthorne Ave, Suite 1
Point Pleasant Beach, NJ 08742

Brick Township Office*:
223 Drum Point Road, Suite 1
Brick Township, NJ 08723

Sea Girt Office*:
2150 NJ-35,
Suite 225
Sea Girt, NJ 08750

Phone: 732-898-3232
Fax: 201-508-3393
*Office visits by appointment only.

Representing clients throughout all court jurisdictions of New Jersey.

WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CRIMINAL TRIAL ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION, NO ASPECT OF THIS ADVERTISEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

en English
en Englishes Spanish