Sex Offenders and Ex Post Facto Laws (Part 1)

by | Sep 11, 2019 | Blog, Criminal Law, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

On July 22, 2019, a three-judge appellate panel decided the Middlesex County case of State v. Paul Timmendequas. The principal issue was whether a sex offender sentenced in 1999 could be charged with failing to register with the local authorities under a 2007 amendment that made the N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2 offense a third degree in stead of a fourth degree without violating Ex Post Facto prohibitions.

Presiding Judge Messano held in relevant part as follows: We come then to the State’s final and most persuasive argument. It notes that N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2 requires all sex offenders to register, including those who are not on any form of supervised release under CSL or PSL, either because their crimes pre-dated the passage of Megan’s Law, or because their particular sex offense does not require a mandatory PSL sentence under N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6.4(a).

The State contends the holding in Hester is limited, therefore, because it was “premised on the Court’s finding that the amended version of N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6.4 enhanced the penalties for a violation of ‘supervised release,’ an obvious penal consequence of the defendants’ original conviction. See Hester, 233N.J. at 385 (“Community supervision for life was a punishment imposed on defendants at the time they were sentenced.”); see also Schubert, 212 N.J. at 307 (distinguishing the consequences of registration and notification from “the significant restrictions that are attendant to [CSL]”). Because registration is not punishment imposed at the time of sentencing, Poritz, 142 N.J. at 43, increasing the penalty for failing to register or notify and re-register upon relocation was not “additional punishment that attached to a condition of defendant’s sentence.” Hester, 233 N.J. at 392. While there is intuitive appeal to the argument, we reject it.

An ex post facto law is one that makes an act illegal that was legal when committed. It is also a law that increases the penalties for an offense after it was committed. The term also applies to a law that changes the rules of evidence to make a conviction easier.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Especially given the situations we had to work under right now with COVID-19, I am glad to have had Fred Sisto represent me. The outcome was much better than anticipated, and he always ensured to maintain proper communication, including not going any further until you 100% understood what's going on, and made a point to keep me updated as much as possible with any of the incoming changes due to quarantine (which was confusing for me at first). Always has your best interests in mind, and an all-around great attorney and person.
Mel C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a detail minded attorney that works tirelessly to get the job done right. If you need help Fred knows how to take care of your issues. Fred has years of experience and will work hard for justice for his clients. Fred is easy to talk to and has great communication skills!
Gibson H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
We retained Fred to represent our daughter. He was amazing from our first phone call. He led us through the process and assured us that all would be taken care of. He was absolutely wonderful with our daughter. We couldn’t have asked for a better outcome. Thank you Fred from the bottom of our hearts. If you need a criminal attorney Fred Sisto Esq. is your guy. Trust me you won’t be disappointed.
Sherry F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I have sought out Mr. Sisto for two traffic related cases. His hard work and dedication to getting results for me was very evident from the get go. He was very informative throughout the entire process of working on my cases and during the court sessions as well. Very professional and very friendly. If anyone in the area is looking for a very good and quality representation, Mr. Sisto is a go to.
Brett S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I was very content with Fred’s services. He was extremely communicative throughout the entire process and I am happy with our results.
Lidia D
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is a great attorney. Highly recommend. He is very trustworthy, professional, and has great communication skills, one being that he is very down to earth and makes you feel comfortable in all possibilities. I am very happy I went with him to represent me, we received the best possible outcome for our matter, while he was honest with all possibilities along the way.
Mike A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Even though I didn't end up using Fred; I had the best experience from him out of anyone I called for a consultation. He was very clear and consise, made sure I understood my options for the situation I was faced with. He ultimately gave me the confidence to go to court pro se for my case. I also get weekly emails now that are extremely helpful and include a wealth of information for goings on around my area.
Warren C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred's services has been more than exceptional. He provided updates on my case. He got me one of the best outcomes i could have asked for, and has represented me twice with amazing results. Fred can work his magic on your case just as he did for me
Chris K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is an excellent attorney. Even though we did not initiate the official pleading process, he deep dived into researching and sorted out my questions without any consultation fee. I highly recommend him!
Qianru Z
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great service
Kelly G