Those Who Sacrifice Liberty for Security Deserve Neither

by | May 20, 2015 | Blog, Criminal Law, News

12647341_sAs mentioned in the boater’s rights blog, the New Jersey State Constitution provides the ceiling of our rights, while the United States Constitution provides the floor.  Put another way, police in all 50 states cannot violate the rights protected by the federal constitution, while individual states are free to either lock-step with federal constitution case law or provide individual state citizens with even greater rights (but never less rights).  Thankfully, New Jersey has a history that favors individual liberty over crime control.  Therefore, our Supreme Court has not been afraid to occasionally go above and beyond the minimum of individual rights guaranteed federal constitution.  This approach is consistent with Benjamin Franklin’s statement that ”Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.”With that in mind, it is imperative for a criminal defense attorney to stay on top the latest New Jersey state court opinions.  But there is also value in reviewing the United State Supreme Court opinions.  Oftentimes the United States Supreme Court addresses an issue that the New Jersey state courts have not yet addressed.  Moreover, even a dissenting federal Supreme Court opinion, i.e. an  opinion of the minority of Justices, becomes the inspiration for a subsequent New Jersey state court opinion.

Recently, I read  Yates v. United States, decided on February 25, 2015.  It was my first time reading an opinion from of our newest member of the United States Supreme Court, Justice Elena Kagan.  I was struck not only by her beautiful writing style, but by how scathing her dissent was in the Yates case.  She seemed to go out of her way to lambaste the concurring opinion of Justice Alito.

Justice Kagan’s dissent reminded me of the controversy surrounding Justice Alito’s confirmation hearing.  In particular, I recall one of the U.S. Senators grilling him about a dissent that he authored as a federal appellate judge.  In that case, Doe v. Groody, Alito opined that police officers were immune from civil liability after they conducted a warrantless strip search of a suspected drug dealer’s wife and ten year old daughter.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very good
Nazario B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I retained Mr. Sisto to assist with a speeding ticket I received on the NJ Turnpike. When we spoke on the phone, he explained my options in a very clear, easy to understand manner. Speaking from experience, Mr. Sisto made a recommendation on how to get the ticket reduced and I agreed. He then contacted the municipal court to set a date for my appearance. On the day of my appearance, Mr. Sisto met me at the courthouse and reviewed what was going to happen. Upon entering the courtroom he sought out the borough attorney and arranged for the ticket to be reduced. We were done in ten minutes. I was just going to pay the ticket and take the two points. I am glad I contacted Mr. Sisto. He really helped me out
Michael G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I love the insight! It helps to keep my kids out of troubel!
Michael G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto handled my case very well. I was happy with outcome. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend him to any of my friends or family.
David V
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is extremely knowledgeable and so helpful. I would recommend him to anyone. He really goes above and beyond. He cares about his work and his clients.
Kevin M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I was very pleased with my representation by Fred Sisto. He is very honest and explained everything to me in detail. I would recommend him to anybody who is seeking legal representation..
Jeff M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
....and his Dog Gonzo is a great attorney.
Duane H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Estoy realmente satisfecho con el excelente trabajo que hizo el abogo en mi caso de DIU. Agradecido por que el caso fue un éxito, ya que además tiene mucho conocimiento en estos casos y no dudo que en otros casos también. Lo recomiendo totalmente.
Luis A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred, Thank you for the notifications on the DUI stops.
Joe F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred will fight for you all the way.
Peter