Bail Reform: Additional Staff Required

by | Dec 13, 2016 | Blog, Criminal Law, Law Reform and Amendments

“Each County Prosecutor and the Division of Criminal Justice shall establish a system of on­ call assistant prosecutors and deputy attorneys general to be available on a 24/7 basis to provide real­ time legal advice and charging approvals to law enforcement officers pursuant to this Directive.6 All assistant prosecutors and deputy attorneys general assigned to on-call duty pursuant to this Directive shall have sufficient experience to perform the functions required for on-call duty, and shall receive training in accordance with Section 14 of this Directive. Advice and charging approvals may be provided by on-call assistant prosecutors and deputy attorneys general in person or by means of telephonic or other electronic communication. The County Prosecutor shall make contact information and procedures available to all agencies operating within the prosecutor’s jurisdiction. The Director may specify the circumstances when a law enforcement agency or officer should directly contact the Division of Criminal Justice rather than a County Prosecutor’s Office. Except as otherwise provided pursuant to Section 3.3, when  a law enforcement officer operating under the authority of the laws of the State of New Jersey makes an arrest for any indictable crime, or for a disorderly persons offense involving domestic violence where any of the grounds specified in N.J .S.A. 2C:25-2l (a)(l) to (4) apply, see note 5, the officer shall contact the appropriate County Prosecutor’s Office, or the Division of Criminal Justice where appropriate, as soon as it is safe and feasible to do so. The consultation with the prosecutor may be made in person or by means of telephonic or other electronic communication. Except as may otherwise be authorized pursuant to Section 3.3, no complaint-summons for any indictable crime, or for a disorderly persons offense involving domestic violence where any of the grounds specified in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-21(a)(l) to (4) apply, shall be issued, and no application for a complaint-warrant for any such crime or offense shall be submitted to a judicial officer authorized to approve a complaint-warrant, without the express approval of an assistant prosecutor or deputy attorney general designated pursuant to Section 3.1. The general requirement established in this section to consult with an assistant prosecutor or deputy attorney general does not apply if the most serious offense for which a defendant is arrested is a disorderly persons offense other than one involving domestic violence where any of the grounds specified in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-2l(a)(l ) to (4) apply. Cf. Section 3.5 (authority of County Prosecutor to require prosecutor review/approval in cases where approval is not required by this Directive).”

This is another example of the potential cost saving benefits of the automated risk assessment system being offset by the use of an additional paid employee as part of the system. Here, it is not just an entry level prosecutor, but an experienced one who commands a higher salary.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
My boyfriend used Fred Sisto twice and had nothing but positive results. Fred was professional, courteous, and punctual. His office was also very attentive and understanding when he had to speak with them regarding his case. I would recommend using Fred to anyone in the monmouth or ocean county region if they had any criminal case regarding the possession of marijuana
C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
....and his Dog Gonzo is a great attorney.
Duane H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am writing to share my experience working with Fred From the very beginning, he provided outstanding service and demonstrated a high level of professionalism. He was attentive to my needs, communicated clearly, and always made sure I understood each step of the process. What impressed me most was his efficiency—he handled my case quickly without compromising on quality. His dedication and expertise gave me confidence and peace of mind throughout the entire process. I highly recommend Fred to anyone seeking reliable and effective legal support. His commitment to his clients and ability to deliver results promptly truly set him apart.
Aida F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am thankful and fortunate to have had Fred represent me as counsel. His expertise, responsiveness and professionalism are second to none. I was more than satisfied with the outcome of my case and the level of service Fred's practice provided.
John M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Excellent advice. Clam and accretive. Handled my case professionally and efficiently. Thank you for the great service. -D.
Danni K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
My charges were dismissed and he quickly got an expungement for me. He's worth way more than what I paid for. I will always be grateful. He never missed a single call, text or email from me. He also keeps me informed of all checkpoints
Bre D
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very professional, always available to answer any questions I had. Plus, I didn't lose my license all thanks to him. Great lawyer overall
David B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is knowledgeable and he has great working relationships with the courts. He HONESTLY is seeking the best deal for you he is not all about the money!! Thanks Fred you saved me BIG TIME!!
Casey B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very good
Nazario B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto handled my case very well. I was happy with outcome. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend him to any of my friends or family.
David V