State’s Drug Court Appeals: Part 4

by Fred Sisto | Jan 9, 2018 | Blog, Criminal Law, Drug Crime

The aforementioned nine factors are:

(1) the person has undergone a professional diagnostic assessment to determine whether and to what extent the person is drug or alcohol dependent and would benefit from treatment; and

(2) the person is a drug or alcohol dependent person within the meaning of 2C:35-2 and was drug or alcohol dependent at the time of the commission of the present offense; and

(3) the present offense was committed while the person was under the influence of a controlled dangerous substance, controlled substance analog, or alcohol, or was committed to acquire property or monies to support the person’s drug or alcohol dependency; and

(4) substance use disorders treatment and monitoring will serve to benefit the person by addressing the person’s drug or alcohol dependency and will thereby reduce the likelihood that the person will thereafter commit another offense; and

(5) the person did not possess a firearm at the time of the present offense and did not possess a firearm at the time of any pending criminal charge; and

(6) the person has not been previously convicted on two or more separate occasions of crimes of the first or second degree, other than those listed in paragraph (7); or the person has not been previously convicted on two or more separate occasions, where one of the offenses is a crime of the third degree, other than crimes defined in 2C:35-10, and one of the offenses is a crime of the first or second degree; and

(7) the person has not been previously convicted or adjudicated delinquent for, and does not have a pending charge of murder, aggravated manslaughter, manslaughter, kidnapping, aggravated assault, aggravated sexual assault or sexual assault, or a similar crime under the laws of any other state or the United States; and

(8) a suitable treatment facility licensed and approved by the Division of Mental Health and Addiction Services in the Department of Human Services is able and has agreed to provide appropriate treatment services in accordance with the requirements of this section; and

(9) no danger to the community will result from the person being placed on special probation pursuant to this section.

Note that factor 5 is poorly-worded. The reasonable interpretation is that those who possess firearms in furtherance of their pending criminal offenses are barred from drug court. Barring drug court participation due to the lawful possession of a firearm would almost certainly violate the Second Amendment.

      Excellent rating  
 Based on 288 reviews 
    
  
 
 
      Have been very happy to share checkpoint info with friends so they can  be safe and sober drivers. Thanks for a great community effort
     Ron T 
 
 
 
 
    Deserved 5 star review. I got all my charges dismissed.
     Mraz09222 
 
 
 
 
    2 👍🏻👍🏻 up
     Cc 
 
 
 
 
    I got my life back together because of this man he is quick,strategic,and will get you threw almost any criminal matter.When things are looking rough legal wise he will fight for you…FRED SISTO THE WAY TO GO!!!
     Byron P 
 
 
 
 
    Fred is an outstanding lawyer. As a fellow attorney, I've relied on his expertise in several cases, and have referred clients to him with excellent results.
     Wyman 
 
 
 
 
    Great site Fred. keep up the good work at informing the public of these unlawful check points.
     Mark H 
 
 
 
 
    Fred is a very competent attorney.  He is knowledgeable, thorough, effective and possesses outstanding interpersonal skills. He provided excellent representation in my case and obtained a favorable outcome.
     Michael G 
 
 
 
 
    I called Mr. Sisto a few weeks back and he returned the call immediately!  I asked a few questions and he clearly explained the options for one of my employees.  He then followed up with a detailed proposal.  He was completely knowledgeable, helpful and insightful.  If I ever had to use him I would feel VERY comfortable with his representation.
     Dave P 
 
 
 
 
    mr. fred sisto esq. was very professional, answered all questions i had, & made my husband & i feel more at ease about our criminal case.
     Meridith T 
 
 
 
 
    Thank you Fred for all your hard work and communication through my case. I got into a situation and very fortunate to have had Fred help me resolve it. He gave me great options and advice on how he would handle the situation and the steps we needed to follow. Highly satisfied with my experience and would highly recommend.
Thank you
Anthony Zappulla
     Anthony Z