Discovery Violations (Part 1)

by | Feb 25, 2019 | Blog, Criminal Law, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

On February 4, 2019, the New Jersey Supreme court decided the Mercer county case of State v. William D. Brown. Justice Solomon wrote for a unanimous Court. The principal issue was whether the State’s failure to produce nineteen discovery items until one week after the beginning of defendants’ murder trial deprived the accused of a fair trial.

Justice Solomon held in relevant part: The Court considers whether the State’s failure to produce nineteen discovery items until one week after the start of the trial of defendants William Brown and Nigil Dawson for the murder of Tracy Crews violated defendants’ due process rights under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). The Court’s Brady analysis requires review of two evidentiary rulings, made after the withheld evidence was provided to defendants, because those rulings circumscribed the evidence on which the State and defense were able to rely. Also at issue is the appropriate remedy for a Brady violation under the circumstances of this case.

In 2008, Crews was shot in his home. His wife, Sheena Robinson-Crews, asked him, “Who did this to you?” She claimed that her dying husband incriminated defendants. Police arrived, and Robinson-Crews made two phone calls within earshot of Detective Bolognini, who reported what he overheard to Detective Norton. Norton, in turn, swore in an affidavit (the Norton Affidavit) that Bolognini heard Robinson-Crews apparently call “whomever shot the victim” and say, “You got what you came for, you did not need to shoot him,” and then make a second call, in which she said, “Those boys did not have to shoot him. They got what they came for . . . .”  Robinson-Crews later called Crews’s mother, Barbara Portis, and told her that Crews said “Paperboy and Youngin” had shot him. Robinson-Crews identified “Youngin” as Dawson and “Paperboy” as Brown. About two months after Crews’s death, Robinson-Crews filed a false police report against Brown saying he pointed a gun at her.

“Youngin’” is a common street name or alias among the younger members of a gang. “Paperboy” is likely a reference to someone who makes money or “paper”.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Excellent advice. Clam and accretive. Handled my case professionally and efficiently. Thank you for the great service. -D.
Danni K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I was very pleased with my representation by Fred Sisto. He is very honest and explained everything to me in detail. I would recommend him to anybody who is seeking legal representation..
Jeff M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very informative. Would not hesitate to use Attorney Sisto.
Rose C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I had occasion to speak with Fred regarding one of my employees who was dealing with an extended revocation. Fred gave me several suggestions which I passed on along with his name and number. I think he used him and he is now back driving. Fred was very professional and responsive even though I wasn't a client.
Dave P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr Sisto did an excellent job in defending my innocence in court. He got me the best result possible. Along with his professionalism and timely responses he was a terrific choice.
Emily F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
i have not needed the service of fred sisto but am grateful for the notices i receive
Bill P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr.Sisto helped me with my registration recently and it was a success. He was not only professional, but he answered in a timely matter and was very detail-oriented. He made sure my issue was resolved as fast as he could. I highly recommend Mr.Sisto to anyone who is experiencing legal issues.
Daniella T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Honestamente el mejor, lucha hasta el final para darte los mejores resultados y es muy honesto. En mi caso iba a perder mi licencia de conducir y hasta dos años de probatoria y el Sr. Sisto lo resolvió con una multa. Estoy muy agradecido y satisfecho con los resultados y del trabajo de el.
Emmanuel A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Have nothing but great things to say about Fred, highly recommended
Bill S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I was very content with Fred’s services. He was extremely communicative throughout the entire process and I am happy with our results.
Lidia D