AG Modifications To CJ Reform Policies: Part 3

by | Nov 12, 2017 | Blog, New Jersey

Anti-Drug ProfiteeringThe assessment can be scored with up to five missing items, and the raw score is subject to proration for unknown or missing items. A defendant is placed in one of seven categories of risk utilizing his/her final score. Each risk category correlates to a research-validated statistical likelihood of recidivism (e.g., a defendant scoring a 5 is 53% likely to recidivate).

Like the PSA, the ODARA measures risk. Unlike the PSA, the AOC has yet to designate the ODARA for use by the Judiciary or the pretrial services program. Thus, no decision-making framework has been developed by the judiciary to manage the risks identified by the ODARA score. Nonetheless, law enforcement will utilize the ODARA to frame critical decisions in certain domestic violence cases. See Section 4.6.

The ODARA measurement is thus subjective and skewed against defendants. This is because it is based on victim and police “input” as opposed to objective statistical data. Ideally, neither the Judiciary nor pretrial services program will give this creation of law enforcement any weight. There were many give and takes between the prosecutions, court, and defense bar during the lengthy implementation of criminal justice and bail reform. The adoption of the ODARA and its pro-prosecutor leanings would be fundamentally unfair under the circumstances.

Not all characteristics of domestic violence offenders are statistically significant in predicting a future assault on an intimate partner. The developers of the ODARA included in the tool only those characteristics that strongly and independently predict recidivism. Therefore, certain factors commonly believed to be typical of domestic violence offenders (e.g., childhood violence, suicide threats, and animal abuse) were not incorporated in the ODARA. Nonetheless, as with the PSA, law enforcement must consider all known relevant information when making critical decisions in the prosecution of domestic violence matters under Criminal Justice Reform. See subsection 4.2.2 and see subsection 4.6.10 (enumerating a non-exclusive list of special factors to be considered).

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Highly professional The lawyer Frederick is a serious and professional person, he helped me a lot in my case, I recommend him a lot to help you too, he is always in contact with you explaining the process, a very patient and kind person.
Ca
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto and his entire staff were courteous, professional and got our case handled quickly and to the best outcome. Great lawyer. Highly recommend.
Bryan B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Fred Sisto is really an amazing attorney! Professional, knowledgeable, and effective. He made me feel comfortable in knowing he was working countless hours on my case to get me the best possible outcome. Mr. Sisto was very responsive and kept me updated with all court proceedings/updates. I am thankful to have had him represent me. I will be recommending Mr. Sisto & his firm to anyone in need. Thanks again ! Much Appreciated
Javier B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is very responsive, courteous, and he really knows what he's doing. I highly recommend Fred.
Kenneth L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great that Fred posts DUI for Monmouth County!
David F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto provides outstanding support and guidance, he is absolutely very quick to respond to your initial inquiry and stands by you throughout your legal circumstances. I highly recommend Mr. Sisto to assist you in your time of need! You will truly be thankful you used his expertise and services!
Ej W
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very good
Nazario B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Spot on, 100%
Earl M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was great and very reasonable. He was extremely easy to get ahold of or very quick to return my calls. I was able to get my charge dropped altogether. I highly recommend Fred!
Jasmine C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great lawyer. Got the best results for me. Very responsive!
Kathleen S