Fred Sisto | Criminal Attorney | Ocean and Monmouth County

Call Us Today
732-898-3232

  • Home
  • Criminal Defense Services
    ▼
    • Drug Crimes
      ▼
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Intent to Distribute Narcotics
      • Prescription Drug Crimes
      • Leader of Narcotics Trafficking Network
    • Weapons Charges
      ▼
      • Prohibited Weapons and Devices
      • Manufacture, Transport, etc. of Weapons
      • Illegal Possession of a Gun
      • Possession of Weapons for Unlawful Purposes
    • Expungements
    • Theft Attorney
    • Violent Crimes
      ▼
      • Robbery/Burglary
      • Manslaughter
      • Extortion
      • Assault
      • Sexual Offenses
    • Arson
    • DUI / DWI
      ▼
      • Alcohol DUI
      • Drug DUI
      • Refusing a Breath Test
    • Driving with A Suspended License
    • Property Forfeiture
    • Anti-Drug Profiteering
    • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Español / Spanish Speaking Attorney
  • About
    ▼
    • Testimonials
    • Defending Cases In
      ▼
      • Monmouth County
      • Ocean County
  • Blog
  • Contact
    ▼
    • Receive a Call From Fred
  • DUI Checkpoint Alerts
  • Results
  • Payment Options
  • Home
  • Criminal Defense Services
    • Drug Crimes
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Intent to Distribute Narcotics
      • Prescription Drug Crimes
      • Leader of Narcotics Trafficking Network
    • Weapons Charges
      • Prohibited Weapons and Devices
      • Manufacture, Transport, etc. of Weapons
      • Illegal Possession of a Gun
      • Possession of Weapons for Unlawful Purposes
    • Expungements
    • Theft Attorney
    • Violent Crimes
      • Robbery/Burglary
      • Manslaughter
      • Extortion
      • Assault
      • Sexual Offenses
    • Arson
    • DUI / DWI
      • Alcohol DUI
      • Drug DUI
      • Refusing a Breath Test
    • Driving with A Suspended License
    • Property Forfeiture
    • Anti-Drug Profiteering
    • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Español / Spanish Speaking Attorney
  • About
    • Testimonials
    • Defending Cases In
      • Monmouth County
      • Ocean County
  • Blog
  • Contact
    • Receive a Call From Fred
  • DUI Checkpoint Alerts
  • Results
  • Payment Options
Home >> AG Modifications To CJ Reform Policies: Part 5

November 16, 2017 by Fred Sisto

AG Modifications To CJ Reform Policies: Part 5

The amended section 4.6.1 of the Attorney General’s Directive regarding criminal justice reform reads:

4.6.1 The Need for a Risk Assessment Tool in Domestic Violence Cases. The automated pretrial risk-assessment and the resulting Public Safety Assessment (PSA) do not account for certain risk factors that are widely recognized as predictive of the likelihood of a domestic violence offender’s risk of re-offending. As such, the developer of the PSA has recommended evaluating the utility of implementing a risk assessment “trailer tool” to inform critical decisions (e.g., complaint-warrant vs. complaint-summons, release conditions, detention) in domestic violence cases. In addition, among the thirty recommendations made by the Supreme Court Ad Hoc Committee on Domestic Violence in its June 28, 2016 report was an endorsement that “New Jersey should develop a system wide, coordinated process for assessing risk and danger in domestic violence cases.” See Report of the Supreme Court Ad Hoc Committee on Domestic Violence (June 28, 2016) at Recommendation 20. The Supreme Court referred the Ad Hoc Committee’s recommendation to the Attorney General for consideration in November 2016. After considerable research and consultation with key stakeholders, the Director of the Division of Criminal Justice has designated the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment ODARA) as the risk assessment tool to be utilized by law enforcement officers in New Jersey to assist in identifying the risk of future assaults between intimate partners. Simply stated, the ODARA scores indicate how likely an abusive partner is to assault again. The ODARA is an evidence-based, validated actuarial tool that was developed for use by police in the field. Its predictive accuracy is the highest predictive effect size reported for validated domestic violence risk assessment tools. No clinical expertise is required to administer an ODARA assessment, and officers can obtain necessary information for scoring the ODARA’s 13 items during an interview with the victim and a review of the defendant’s criminal history and related records (e.g., prior police reports, Computer Aided Dispatch reports, etc.). Training can be accomplished in a relatively swift and straightforward fashion.

The phrase “widely recognized as predictive of the likelihood of a domestic violence offender’s risk of re-offending” is suspect. The same is true regarding the phrases “After considerable research and consultation with key stakeholders”. The fact that “officers can obtain necessary information for scoring the ODARA’s 13 items during an interview with the victim and a review of the defendant’s criminal history and related records (e.g., prior police reports, Computer Aided Dispatch reports, etc.)” makes it clear that the tool will rely on biased hearsay and be skewed towards pretrial detention in cases involving allegations of “domestic violence.” Note that the maximum sentence for the most common “domestic violence” offenses is six months in jail. Since most every detainee will have served that much time before their case can get to trial, the Attorney General’s change in position brings us back to the all-too-common situation that was a driving reason for the very criminal justice reforms at issue. That situation is one where a defendant is coerced into pleading guilty because a sentence of “time served” will get them home faster than an acquittal at trial.

Filed Under: Criminal Law, New Jersey Tagged With: Criminal Law

Testimonials

Fred is a stickler for detail and communicates with clients very, very well. He is smart and astute. I would recommend him unconditionally.

Tom O   

I would highly recommend Mr. Sisto. He is very insightful and proficient, yet still down to Earth. Fred is great at communicating and breaking down the facts. But most importantly, he excels at getting results.

Bill K   

Thanks to Fred I have no criminal record whatsoever.

Luke A   

Great!!! , got my case handled in the exact manner that I was told and would recommend to everyone else in need of legal representation.

Raumelis R   
See More Testimonials

Recent Posts

  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 4)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 3)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 2)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 1)
  • Jurisdiction and Subsequent Prosecutions (Part 2)
  • Jurisdiction and Subsequent Prosecutions (Part 1)
  • Statutes of Limitations and DNA Evidence (Part 3)
  • Statutes of Limitations and DNA Evidence (Part 2)

Recent Speaking Engagement

Site Disclaimer

Attorney Referral Fees

Frederick P Sisto has earned Lawyer Legion's recognition for Community Leadership
 
Top Criminal Defense Attorney in Brick

Law Office of Frederick P. Sisto

Point Pleasant Office*:
302 Hawthorne Ave, Suite 1
Point Pleasant Beach, NJ 08742

Brick Township Office*:
223 Drum Point Road, Suite 1
Brick Township, NJ 08723

Sea Girt Office*:
2150 NJ-35,
Suite 225
Sea Girt, NJ 08750

Phone: 732-898-3232
Fax: 201-508-3393
*Office visits by appointment only.

Representing clients throughout all court jurisdictions of New Jersey.

WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CRIMINAL TRIAL ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION, NO ASPECT OF THIS ADVERTISEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

en English
en Englishes Spanish