AG Modifications To CJ Reform Policies: Part 7

by | Nov 20, 2017 | Blog, Criminal Law, New Jersey

The old section 4.6.2 from the Attorney General Criminal Justice Reform Directive was replaced with the following section, consistent with the Attorney General’s new emphasis on detaining all alleged “domestic violence” offenders pretrial:

4.6.2 Critical Definitions for the ODARA.

For the purpose of scoring the ODARA, the following definitions shall apply:

Assault: the most recent incident in which the person being assessed assaulted his/her current or former Partner. Assault is any act of violence that involved physical contact with the Victim or a credible threat of death made with a weapon displayed in the presence of the Victim.

— Defendant: the person being assessed.

— Victim: the person upon whom the Assault was committed.

— Partner: a person who currently is, or previously was, involved with the Defendant in an intimate relationship. This includes current or former spouses, current or former intimate cohabitants, co-parents, and those currently or formerly in a dating relationship.

These definitions are superfluous. Assault is already defined by our criminal code and the relevant section of the criminal code will be referenced in the initial charging document. The definitions for “Defendant”, “Victim”, and “Partner” are self-explanatory. The more accurate term at this early stage is “alleged victim”, since the defendant is presumed innocent unless they are convicted of the assault at issue.

The following section was then removed from the Attorney General’s Guidelines:

4.6.3 Situations Where Law Enforcement Must Apply for a Complaint-Warrant and Seek Special Conditions to Protect Domestic Violence Victims. In any case involving domestic violence where the police officer or assistant prosecutor or deputy attorney general consulted in accordance with Section 3.2 or supervisory officer designated pursuant to subsection 3.3.2 has reason to believe, considering the totality of the circumstances, including but not limited to the special factors listed in paragraphs 1 through 4 of subsection 4.6.2, that issuance of a no-contact condition or other restraint, a requirement to surrender weapons, or any other special condition of pretrial release expressly authorized by N.J.S.A. 2C:25-26(a) is necessary to reasonably assure the immediate safety of the victim, the officer or prosecutor shall, notwithstanding any other provision of this Directive other than subsection 4.6.1, apply for a complaint warrant and seek imposition of the conditions) needed to reasonably assure the immediate safety of the victim. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to preempt or in any way alter the authority of the agency or the victim to apply for a temporary or final restraining order, and the special conditions of pretrial release in the criminal prosecution sought pursuant to this subsection shall be in addition to, not in lieu of, any such civil temporary or final restraining order.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was incredibly helpful during a very stressful time. Even during a pandemic he was fast at responding to any and all questions or problems that I had. He went above and beyond to make sure that I was happy with my results and that my case was being handled properly all the way through. Highly recommend this office!
Toni V
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Muy buen abogado lo rrecomiendo!!
Victor N
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Iv had good lawyers defend me before but Mr.Sisto is beyond the best iv had. He explains everything every step of the way until your court date and excels on getting results , I defenatly recomend his services.
Imer J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was extremely helpful and knowledgable. He made the whole process as painless and easy as possible.
Toli C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Today my life was about to change! With great communication and excellent service he was able to create the impossible!! I am now able to continue to drive for a living!! I highly recommend his services and trust his judgment-HE KNOWS HIS STUFF!!! He saved my life and livelihood today! Mr.Frank Sisto is an absolutely amazing attorney! Thank you again I’ll never forget this day! God Bless
Edward J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a fantastic attorney who is very informative, knows the system well, and is very thorough.
Bob V
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto's attention to detail, his representation and unwavering advocacy for me made all the difference in my case.
Jill F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is an excellent attorney. Even though we did not initiate the official pleading process, he deep dived into researching and sorted out my questions without any consultation fee. I highly recommend him!
Qianru Z
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I have sought out Mr. Sisto for two traffic related cases. His hard work and dedication to getting results for me was very evident from the get go. He was very informative throughout the entire process of working on my cases and during the court sessions as well. Very professional and very friendly. If anyone in the area is looking for a very good and quality representation, Mr. Sisto is a go to.
Brett S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is a professional, knowledgeable, and exceptional attorney. He is very responsive and maintains continuous contact with his clients via phone and email. Fred made sure that we understood the charges and was able to work on getting us the best outcome possible. He even went above and beyond in the court room by assisting with translation from English to Spanish. I highly recommend him to anyone who is in need of legal services and representation. In the future if needed I would definitely use him again as an attorney.
Sara A