Amendment To AG Internal Affairs Policy: Part 1

by | Dec 28, 2017 | Blog, Criminal Law, New Jersey

On November 15, 2017, the New Jersey Attorney General amended Law Enforcement Directive No. 2017-2 regarding “Internal Affairs Policy and Procedures”. The amendment now requires mandatory notification of the disposition of complaints to internal affairs complainants.

The AG’s memo reads:

TO: Director, Division of Criminal Justice Superintendent, New Jersey State Police All County Prosecutors All County Sheriffs All Police Chiefs All Law Enforcement Chief Executives

FROM: Christopher S. Porrino, Attorney General

In July 2014, the Attorney General amended the “Internal Affairs Policy and Procedures,” originally issued in August 1991 (hereinafter, the “Policy”). The Policy previously was amended in September 2011, November 2000, and November 1992. In New Jersey, county and state municipal law enforcement agencies conduct internal affairs investigations under the general supervision of the Attorney General, the State’s chief law enforcement officer. See N.J.S.A. 52:17B-98.

All law enforcement agencies, including county and municipal forces, have a duty to cooperate with the Attorney General to improve the administration of the criminal justice system, including the efficient delivery of police services. For county and municipal law enforcement agencies, cooperation in internal affairs matters begins with strict adherence to the Attorney General’s basic policy requirements. In a continued effort to promote transparency, bolster credibility, and improve relationships between law enforcement and the community, the Policy hereby is revised to mandate that an internal affairs investigator must advise the complainant (if the identity of the complainant is known) of the status of his or her complaint, if requested, and, upon completion of the investigation, of the ultimate disposition of the complaint.

Previously, the decision to provide notice to the complainant was at the discretion of the county or municipal internal affairs officer. Now, under the revision set forth herein, provision of such notice is mandatory.

It would be interesting to know if a county or municipal internal affairs officer ever issued a discretionary notice to a complainant. Chances are that such notice never occurred, at least in the absence of follow up inquiries from the complainant.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Especially given the situations we had to work under right now with COVID-19, I am glad to have had Fred Sisto represent me. The outcome was much better than anticipated, and he always ensured to maintain proper communication, including not going any further until you 100% understood what's going on, and made a point to keep me updated as much as possible with any of the incoming changes due to quarantine (which was confusing for me at first). Always has your best interests in mind, and an all-around great attorney and person.
Mel C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Thank you very much for your information on DUI check points. It is a great asset to the community . 5 stars for sure!
James P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred always publishes where local DWI Checkpoints are going to be! He is also a very prominent Attorney in the Ocean County areas of Point Pleasent and Now a new Brick office!
Michael K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Realmente es un gran abogado, me ayudo muchísimo en todo este proceso y sobre todo que habla español que es una de las cosas importantes para mi. Por que lo hizo mas entendible y facil cada una de las cosas que tenía que hacer y su amabilidad y paciencia para poder explicarme qué tenía que hacer. Además que mi caso fue un éxito gracias a él ya cada uno de sus conocimientos y a su apoyo en todo momento. Lo recomiendo 100%.
Luis A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
My boyfriend used Fred Sisto twice and had nothing but positive results. Fred was professional, courteous, and punctual. His office was also very attentive and understanding when he had to speak with them regarding his case. I would recommend using Fred to anyone in the monmouth or ocean county region if they had any criminal case regarding the possession of marijuana
C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was great and very reasonable. He was extremely easy to get ahold of or very quick to return my calls. I was able to get my charge dropped altogether. I highly recommend Fred!
Jasmine C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was very professional, competent, and a pleasure to deal with I cant thank him enough I highly recommend his services
Mildred T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Recently I encountered some legal matters in the state of New Jersey during my visit and it would have became serious if it was not taken care of. Mr. Sisto and I discussed the case through the phone and exchanged documents through email. Since I was unable to travel back and forth due to restricted time, I have asked Mr. Sisto to handle the case on my behalf. I was very pleased with the result and would recommend Mr. Sisto for any legal matters.
Nam N
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Exquisite business ethic couldn't ask for a better service from a lawyer superior job def recommend to friends family and even strangers
Lukas A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is fast, attentive and excels at what he does. He provides reasonable and professional advice when your are dealing with complex and stressful legal situations. He is straight to the point and does not wast time. I would use him again and definitely recommend.
1093Nj