Amendment To AG Internal Affairs Policy: Part 1

by | Dec 28, 2017 | Blog, Criminal Law, New Jersey

On November 15, 2017, the New Jersey Attorney General amended Law Enforcement Directive No. 2017-2 regarding “Internal Affairs Policy and Procedures”. The amendment now requires mandatory notification of the disposition of complaints to internal affairs complainants.

The AG’s memo reads:

TO: Director, Division of Criminal Justice Superintendent, New Jersey State Police All County Prosecutors All County Sheriffs All Police Chiefs All Law Enforcement Chief Executives

FROM: Christopher S. Porrino, Attorney General

In July 2014, the Attorney General amended the “Internal Affairs Policy and Procedures,” originally issued in August 1991 (hereinafter, the “Policy”). The Policy previously was amended in September 2011, November 2000, and November 1992. In New Jersey, county and state municipal law enforcement agencies conduct internal affairs investigations under the general supervision of the Attorney General, the State’s chief law enforcement officer. See N.J.S.A. 52:17B-98.

All law enforcement agencies, including county and municipal forces, have a duty to cooperate with the Attorney General to improve the administration of the criminal justice system, including the efficient delivery of police services. For county and municipal law enforcement agencies, cooperation in internal affairs matters begins with strict adherence to the Attorney General’s basic policy requirements. In a continued effort to promote transparency, bolster credibility, and improve relationships between law enforcement and the community, the Policy hereby is revised to mandate that an internal affairs investigator must advise the complainant (if the identity of the complainant is known) of the status of his or her complaint, if requested, and, upon completion of the investigation, of the ultimate disposition of the complaint.

Previously, the decision to provide notice to the complainant was at the discretion of the county or municipal internal affairs officer. Now, under the revision set forth herein, provision of such notice is mandatory.

It would be interesting to know if a county or municipal internal affairs officer ever issued a discretionary notice to a complainant. Chances are that such notice never occurred, at least in the absence of follow up inquiries from the complainant.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred completely exceeded all expectations with the result of my case.
John M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I love the insight! It helps to keep my kids out of troubel!
Michael G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great!!! , got my case handled in the exact manner that I was told and would recommend to everyone else in need of legal representation .
Raumelis R
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Best criminal defense lawyer in ocean county!!
Austin A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Called back within 10 minutes,very easy to talk to. Not judgmental at all. I am hopeful about the outcome.
Colleen H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred helped me in a civil matter and was very attentive to my needs and responsive to my emails. Also very detail-oriented and timely. Highly recommend.
Kristen C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very knowledgeable within every aspect of the law. Highly recommend his talent for your criminal defense.
Will S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Hired Mr.Sisto to handle a case of mine a couple of months ago and while the service was okay the customer service was awful. When I had inquired about a charge I was unsure of on my bill, Mr. Sisto immediately got defensive and had the unprofessionalism to ask me if I “was high” for asking this question. I wonder if Mr. Sisto asks all of his clients this question or only the ones who have jobs in the cannabis industry? Regardless, I don’t believe this was an appropriate question to ask, regardless of the industry one works in, and therefore Mr. Sisto needs to heavily work on his customer service. Edit: Mr. Sisto had the UNPROFESSIONALISM to reach out to my family and ask them to ask me to take down my review instead of reaching out directly towards me when it was I who was his client, not my family. Clearly speaks to the unprofessionalism surrounding this practice. This has not been the only time Mr.Sisto has gone directly to my family instead of me, his client, for important legal matters and I will not seek out his services again. For those who may not understand Spanish, the email starts with “You should speak to your daughter regarding the review she has just published.” Edit to Response: As an attorney, one should be able to make appropriate questions and comments regardless if a client is “uncooperative” or “disrespectful.” The fact that rather than apologizing for the awful interaction with your firm, and I was not released “within hours” as you claim shows how low value your firm is and how you openly instead chose to harass my family through email for my initial review rather than actually revomy case which I ended up doing and you chareged me for . Regardless of results, your character speaks volumes and anyone who reads this would know better than to give their money to an awful person such as yourself. What a shame
Ximena C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great experience overall having Frederick P Sisto as my attorney. Sisto understands his client, very insightful and is an expert in his field. Truly a professional and marvelous individual.
Maybelin R
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
For the people. For the little guy My legal bully
Glennlykesmusic