Bail Reform: Avoiding Detention in County Jail (Part 2)

by | Dec 7, 2016 | Blog, Criminal Law, Law Reform and Amendments

“Charging by complaint-summons rather than by complaint-warrant generally would be appropriate when the facts known at the time of the charging decision reliably indicate that the defendant requires no monitoring or only minimal monitoring upon release. A complaint-warrant, in contrast, generally should be sought when the defendant poses a moderate or high risk of flight, new criminal activity or violence, or threat to the criminal justice process that should be managed by monitored release conditions, if not by the defendant’s pretrial detention.

Furthermore, a complaint-warrant should be sought in domestic violence cases where imposition of a no-contact or other restraint is reasonably necessary to assure the immediate protection of the victim. See subsection 4.6.3. Note, moreover, that issuance of a complaint-warrant would preserve the option of applying for pretrial detention, or revocation of release if defendant were to violate a release condition, and/or to seek electronic monitoring (an ankle bracelet) by the pretrial services program as a release condition. See Section 4.6.”

This is another example of the Bail Reform Law that is supposed to avoid the detention of petty offenders making it possible to detain individuals for days when they would presently be permitted to post little to no bail to secure their release. A case in point is a domestic violence where the most serious offense is most often a disorderly persons simple assault. Presently there is a presumption against requiring anything more than a $2,500 bail, a figure that most people could easily post without being lodged in the county jail. Under the new law the presumption is turned on its head in these cases where the accused will now routinely be held in the county jail for several days before it is possible to be released. Note that the phrase “is reasonably necessary to assure the immediate protection of the victim” will, in theory, always apply, since the act of charging a domestic partner with a criminal offense will always make it reasonable to be concerned for the alleged victim’s safety.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Thank you very much for your information on DUI check points. It is a great asset to the community . 5 stars for sure!
James P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Not to long ago I ran into a very serious legal issue for the first time in my life, I'm closing in on 60. Needless to say I was unsure of the process. I was fortunate that a friend recommended Fred. Fred handled my case in a professional and courteous manner yet was very down to earth and straight forward. It took nearly 9 month to resolve and during that time Fred was always available to answer questions, explain the process and most of all alleviate my stress. I feel we got the best possible outcome and I would highly recommend Fred to anyone facing a legal/criminal matter
Manny P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great that Fred posts DUI for Monmouth County!
David F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I recently utilized his exceptional services and would highly recommend them to anyone seeking legal advice.
Mark A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Fred Sisto is really an amazing attorney! Professional, knowledgeable, and effective. He made me feel comfortable in knowing he was working countless hours on my case to get me the best possible outcome. Mr. Sisto was very responsive and kept me updated with all court proceedings/updates. I am thankful to have had him represent me. I will be recommending Mr. Sisto & his firm to anyone in need. Thanks again ! Much Appreciated
Javier B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Called back within 10 minutes,very easy to talk to. Not judgmental at all. I am hopeful about the outcome.
Colleen H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great!!! , got my case handled in the exact manner that I was told and would recommend to everyone else in need of legal representation .
Raumelis R
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto was not only a knowledgeable and excellent lawyer, he was compassionate and understanding during this difficult time. I found Mr. Sisto to always be available and he services were affordable and effective. You will not find a better lawyer.
Joseph S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Always up to date on with his services.
Anthony L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
He is the best professional to have on your side taking care of your interests. Your in the best of hands.
Stuart C