Bail Reform: Prosecutor’s Objection to The Defendant’s Release

by | Jan 10, 2017 | Blog, Criminal Law, Law Reform and Amendments

Anti-Drug Profiteering“If the assistant prosecutor or deputy attorney general has reason to request that the defendant have no contact with the victim of the alleged offense, or no contact with any other witness(es) who may testify concerning the offense, the prosecutor shall object to defendant’s release on recognizance pursuant  to  N.J.S.A. 2A: 162- 17(a),  and  shall  ask  that the  defendant  be  released,  if  at  all, under N.J.S.A. 2A:162-17(b), and that the defendant be ordered as a condition of release to have no contact with the victim and/or witness(es). See also subsection 6.2.3. The prosecutor shall as soon as practicable advise the victim and/or witnesses of the terms of any such pretrial release condition(s) imposed at the first appearance.”

Again, we see mischievous provisions buried in the middle of this voluminous Attorney General Directive. The mischief is not clear on its face, but the following logic cannot seriously be disputed. Here, at pages 53 and 54 of the 84 page document, we see that prosecutors are essentially directed to object to any and all releases on personal recognizance. This is because of the fact that most any case will involve an alleged victim or witness (presumably meaning “lay witness” as opposed to a police officer). The only remaining cases would be those involving victimless drug possessions. In the case of victimless drug possessions, prosecutors are directed to object to a release without pretrial conditions because of the alleged high likelihood of drug possessors (including petty marijuana offenders) to re-offend. The language above is particularly disturbing in light of the fact that the bail reform legislation is supposed to impose the least burdensome conditions on defendants, i.e. only those conditions reasonable necessary to ensure the safety of the community at large and to ensure that defendants appear at future court dates. The directive, on the other hand, presupposes that no one will come to court without pretrial conditions. Our courts recognize the empirical evidence showing that very few people abscond from pending charges.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto handled my case very well. I was happy with outcome. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend him to any of my friends or family.
David V
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a detail minded attorney that works tirelessly to get the job done right. If you need help Fred knows how to take care of your issues. Fred has years of experience and will work hard for justice for his clients. Fred is easy to talk to and has great communication skills!
Gibson H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
For the people. For the little guy My legal bully
Glennlykesmusic
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred always publishes where local DWI Checkpoints are going to be! He is also a very prominent Attorney in the Ocean County areas of Point Pleasent and Now a new Brick office!
Michael K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
The DUI checkpoint alerts have been exceptional. Much needed work to bring attention to the unconstitutional searches.
Daniel K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very knowledgeable with expungement!!! Thanks again!!!
Nicole B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Like clockwork thank you for all the info
Lee M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am writing to share my experience working with Fred From the very beginning, he provided outstanding service and demonstrated a high level of professionalism. He was attentive to my needs, communicated clearly, and always made sure I understood each step of the process. What impressed me most was his efficiency—he handled my case quickly without compromising on quality. His dedication and expertise gave me confidence and peace of mind throughout the entire process. I highly recommend Fred to anyone seeking reliable and effective legal support. His commitment to his clients and ability to deliver results promptly truly set him apart.
Aida F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Frederick is a pleasure to work with,great family guy. Fred pays attention to every detail and is totally accessible.
Tom A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Not to long ago I ran into a very serious legal issue for the first time in my life, I'm closing in on 60. Needless to say I was unsure of the process. I was fortunate that a friend recommended Fred. Fred handled my case in a professional and courteous manner yet was very down to earth and straight forward. It took nearly 9 month to resolve and during that time Fred was always available to answer questions, explain the process and most of all alleviate my stress. I feel we got the best possible outcome and I would highly recommend Fred to anyone facing a legal/criminal matter
Manny P