On July 7, 2025, a three-judge appellate panel decided the Middlesex County case of In Re Registrant S.O. The principal issue under N.J.S.A. 2C:7-2 concerned the proper considerations under the “public safety prong” for evaluating a motion to terminate Megan’s Law and...
On May 27, 2025, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided the Passaic County case of M.A. v. J.H.M. The principal issue under N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29 concerned whether a trial court can draw an adverse inference from a defendant’s refusal to testify at a Final Restraining Order...
On May 6, 2025, a unanimous New Jersey Supreme Court decided the Mercer County case of State v. John Bragg. The principal issue under N.J.S.A. 2C:3-4 concerned self-defense and whether the jury was properly instructed on the “castle doctrine.” Chief Justice Rabner...
On April 29, 2025, a three-judge appellate panel decided the Cape May County case of State v. C.C.W. The principal issue under N.J.S.A. 2C:35-31 was whether immunity for drug possession under the Overdose Protection Act is available when the defendant can prove that...
On April 11, 2025, a three-judge appellate panel decided the Bergen County case of State v. Mohammad Ramadan. The principal issue under N.J.S.A. 2C:5-1 concerned whether the attempted murder indictment should be dismissed because of the prosecutor’s inconsistent...
On March 31, 2025, a three-judge appellate panel decided the Camden County case of State v. Frank Amang. The principal issue under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 concerned whether the trial court’s response to a jury question regarding corporal punishment and parental authority was...
On March 20, 2025, a three-judge appellate panel decided the Morris County case of State v. Ahjhir Jones. The principal issue under N.J.S.A. 2C:35-14 concerned the defendant’s Recovery Court application after he pleaded guilty to a gun charge. Judge Natali wrote for...
Decided On March 14, 2025, a three-judge appellate panel decided the Middlesex County case of State v. Thomas Canales. The principal issue under N.J.S.A. 2C:1-9 concerned whether the defendant could be tried again after his two trials ended in a hung jury and an...
On February 7, 2025, a three-judge appellate panel decided the Somerset County case of State v. Cindy Keogh. The principal issue under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1.2 whether a “Endangering an Injured Victim” charge could be based on a delay in calling 9-1-1. The case involved a...
The Appellate Division concluded with the following in relevant part: While we are mindful of the administrative burdens that will result from remanding a potentially large number of pipeline cases for new jury trials, we are not prepared to hold that the defendants...