Changes to Marijuana-Related Expungements (Part 19)

by | Mar 11, 2020 | Blog, Criminal Law, Drug Crime, Marijuana, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

The amendments to N.J.S.A 2C:52-6 continue:

b. Notwithstanding the provisions concerning the ten-year time requirement, if, at the time of application, a court-ordered financial assessment subject to collection under the comprehensive enforcement program established pursuant to P.L.1995, c.9 (C.2B:19-1 et al.) is not yet satisfied due to reasons other than willful noncompliance, but the time requirement of ten years is otherwise satisfied, the person may submit the expungement application and the court shall grant an expungement in accordance with this section; provided, however, that at the time of the expungement the court shall enter a civil judgment for the unpaid portion of the court-ordered financial assessment in the name of the Treasurer, State of New Jersey and transfer collection and disbursement responsibility to the State Treasurer for the outstanding amount in accordance with section 8 of P.L.2017, c.244 (C.2C:52-23.1). The Treasurer may specify, and the Administrative Office of the Courts shall collaborate with, the technical and informational standards required to effectuate the transfer of the collection and disbursement responsibilities.  Notwithstanding any provision in this law or any other law to the contrary, the court shall have sole discretion to amend the judgment.  

c. No expungement applications may be filed pursuant to this section after the establishment of the automated ”clean slate” process pursuant to subsection a. of section 8 of P.L.   (C.   )(pending before the Legislature as this bill).

 

8. (New section) Automated “clean slate” process.  a. (1) The State shall develop and implement an automated process, based, to the greatest extent practicable, on the recommendations of the task force established pursuant to subsection b. of this section, by which all convictions, and all records and information pertaining thereto, shall be rendered inaccessible to the public, through sealing, expungement, or some equivalent process, for any person who has been convicted of one or more crimes, one or more disorderly persons or petty disorderly persons offenses, or a combination of one or more crimes and offenses under the laws of this State, unless the person has a conviction for a crime which is not subject to expungement pursuant to subsection b. or c. of N.J.S.2C:52-2, upon the expiration of a period of ten years from the date of the person’s most recent conviction, payment of any court-ordered financial assessment, satisfactory completion of probation or parole, or release from incarceration, whichever is later.  The term “court-ordered financial assessment” as used herein means and includes any fine, fee, penalty, restitution, and other form of financial assessment imposed by the court as part of the sentence for the conviction or convictions that are subject to being rendered inaccessible to the public, for which payment of restitution takes precedence in accordance with chapter 46 of Title 2C of the New Jersey Statutes.  (2) The automated process shall be designed to restore a person’s convictions and other information contained in the person’ criminal history record information files if the person is subsequently convicted of a crime, for which the conviction is not subject to expungement pursuant to subsection b. or c. of N.J.S.2C:52-2.  A prosecutor may submit the restored criminal history record information to the court for consideration at sentencing for the subsequent conviction.

Language concerning sub-section (b)8 becoming operative 180 days after enactment was removed from the final version. That period was reduced to 90 days. The mechanisms by which expunged criminal convictions are to be privately maintained raise concerns about unintended public access to them in the event of a data breach. While it is a criminal offense to disclose the existence of an expunged record, data breaches tend to happen anonymously. This makes it difficult to identify the offender(s).

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Especially given the situations we had to work under right now with COVID-19, I am glad to have had Fred Sisto represent me. The outcome was much better than anticipated, and he always ensured to maintain proper communication, including not going any further until you 100% understood what's going on, and made a point to keep me updated as much as possible with any of the incoming changes due to quarantine (which was confusing for me at first). Always has your best interests in mind, and an all-around great attorney and person.
Mel C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a detail minded attorney that works tirelessly to get the job done right. If you need help Fred knows how to take care of your issues. Fred has years of experience and will work hard for justice for his clients. Fred is easy to talk to and has great communication skills!
Gibson H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
We retained Fred to represent our daughter. He was amazing from our first phone call. He led us through the process and assured us that all would be taken care of. He was absolutely wonderful with our daughter. We couldn’t have asked for a better outcome. Thank you Fred from the bottom of our hearts. If you need a criminal attorney Fred Sisto Esq. is your guy. Trust me you won’t be disappointed.
Sherry F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I have sought out Mr. Sisto for two traffic related cases. His hard work and dedication to getting results for me was very evident from the get go. He was very informative throughout the entire process of working on my cases and during the court sessions as well. Very professional and very friendly. If anyone in the area is looking for a very good and quality representation, Mr. Sisto is a go to.
Brett S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I was very content with Fred’s services. He was extremely communicative throughout the entire process and I am happy with our results.
Lidia D
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is a great attorney. Highly recommend. He is very trustworthy, professional, and has great communication skills, one being that he is very down to earth and makes you feel comfortable in all possibilities. I am very happy I went with him to represent me, we received the best possible outcome for our matter, while he was honest with all possibilities along the way.
Mike A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Even though I didn't end up using Fred; I had the best experience from him out of anyone I called for a consultation. He was very clear and consise, made sure I understood my options for the situation I was faced with. He ultimately gave me the confidence to go to court pro se for my case. I also get weekly emails now that are extremely helpful and include a wealth of information for goings on around my area.
Warren C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred's services has been more than exceptional. He provided updates on my case. He got me one of the best outcomes i could have asked for, and has represented me twice with amazing results. Fred can work his magic on your case just as he did for me
Chris K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is an excellent attorney. Even though we did not initiate the official pleading process, he deep dived into researching and sorted out my questions without any consultation fee. I highly recommend him!
Qianru Z
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great service
Kelly G