Changes to Marijuana-Related Expungements (Part 26)

by | Mar 25, 2020 | Blog, Criminal Law, Drug Crime, Marijuana, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

14.    Section 8 of P.L.2017, c.244 (C.2C:52-23.1) is amended to read as follows:

8.  a. Notwithstanding any provision in this act to the contrary, expunged or sealed records may be used to facilitate the State Treasurer’s collection of any court-ordered financial assessments that remain due at the time an expungement or sealing of records is granted by the court.  The term “court-ordered financial assessment” as used herein and throughout this section means and includes any fine, fee, penalty, restitution, and other form of financial assessment imposed by the court as part of the sentence for the conviction or convictions that are the subject of the expungement or sealing order , for which payment of restitution takes precedence in accordance with chapter 46 of Title 2C of the New Jersey Statutes.  Information regarding the nature of such financial assessments or their derivation from expunged or sealed records shall not be disclosed to the public.  Any record of a civil judgment for the unpaid portion of any court-ordered financial assessment that may be docketed after the court has granted an expungement or sealing of records shall be entered in the name of the Treasurer, State of New Jersey. The State Treasurer shall thereafter administer such judgments disclosure of any information related to the underlying nature of the assessments.

16.  N.J.S.2C:52-29 is amended to read as follows:

2C:52-29. |Any person who files an application pursuant to this chapter shall not be charged a fee for applying for an expungement, and any fee set forth in the Rules of Court, which was, based on the Supreme Court’s temporary authority pursuant to sections 12 through 15, and 17 through 19 of P.L.2014, c.31 (C.2B:1-7 through C.2B:1-13), a revision or supplement by the Supreme Court to the fee charged pursuant to this section prior to its amendment by P.L. , c. (C. ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill), is void.

A sub-section (b.) to 2C:52-23.1 was deleted in its entirety. This deleted sub-section permitted the nullification of an expungement if the petitioner willfully failed to comply with an established payment plan. 2C:52-29 was amended to delete the $30 expungement application processing fee that previously applied.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I think Fred's alerts are a great service to his audience and a very smart marketing tool. Keep up the good work, Fred.
Charles O
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Today my life was about to change! With great communication and excellent service he was able to create the impossible!! I am now able to continue to drive for a living!! I highly recommend his services and trust his judgment-HE KNOWS HIS STUFF!!! He saved my life and livelihood today! Mr.Frank Sisto is an absolutely amazing attorney! Thank you again I’ll never forget this day! God Bless
Edward J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I had the pleasure of dealing with Mr Sisto personally from beginning to end. He was very Professional, very clear with his communication and acted quickly to find a solution to my particular issue. I HIGHLY recommend Frederick P Sisto to any and all who need an amazing and hard working attorney...
Eddie B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Especially given the situations we had to work under right now with COVID-19, I am glad to have had Fred Sisto represent me. The outcome was much better than anticipated, and he always ensured to maintain proper communication, including not going any further until you 100% understood what's going on, and made a point to keep me updated as much as possible with any of the incoming changes due to quarantine (which was confusing for me at first). Always has your best interests in mind, and an all-around great attorney and person.
Mel C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am thankful and fortunate to have had Fred represent me as counsel. His expertise, responsiveness and professionalism are second to none. I was more than satisfied with the outcome of my case and the level of service Fred's practice provided.
John M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
....and his Dog Gonzo is a great attorney.
Duane H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
The most important thing an attorney can do for their client is get results in the courtroom. Fred Sisto did this for me, and did so in such a professional and communicative manner that I would absolutely recommend him to anyone in New Jersey who is dealing with criminal charges. Fred was able get results when other attorneys did not. I definitely recommend speaking with him.
Brian C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
always feel better knowing I don't need to be stopped when I haven't done anything wrong it's a great service and gives me peace of mint
Liesel T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great Job! Enjoy getting the updates.
Ed R
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
He has helped numerous people stay out of trouble
Christopher B