Changes to Marijuana-Related Expungements (Part 8)

by | Feb 18, 2020 | Blog, Criminal Law, Drug Crime, Marijuana, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County, Uncategorized

The amended 2C:52-2 section ends with the following:

d. In the case of a State licensed physician or podiatrist convicted of an offense involving drugs or alcohol or pursuant to section 14 or 15 of P.L.1989, c.300 (C.2C:21-20 or 2C:21-4.1), the petitioner shall notify the State Board of Medical Examiners upon filing an application for expungement and provide the board with a copy thereof. The petitioner shall also provide to the court a certification attesting that the requirements of this subsection were satisfied. Failure to satisfy the requirements of this subsection shall be grounds for denial of the expungement application and, if applicable, administrative discipline by the board.

(cf: P.L.2017, c.244, s.1)

N.J.S.2C:52-3 is amended to read as follows:

2C:52-3. Disorderly persons offenses and petty disorderly persons offenses.

a. Any person who has been convicted of one or more disorderly persons or petty disorderly persons offenses under the laws of this State who has not been convicted of any crime, whether within this State or any other jurisdiction, may present an expungement application to a court pursuant to this section. Any person who has been convicted of one or more disorderly persons or petty disorderly persons offenses under the laws of this State who has also been convicted of one or more crimes shall not be eligible to apply for an expungement pursuant to this section, but may present an expungement application to the Superior Court pursuant to N.J.S.2C:52-2.

b. Any person who has been convicted of one or more disorderly persons or petty disorderly persons offenses under the laws of this State who has not been convicted of any crime, whether within this State or any other jurisdiction, may present an expungement application pursuant to this section to any court designated by the Rules of Court if:

the person has been convicted, under the laws of this State, on the same or separate occasions of no more than five disorderly persons offenses, no more than five petty disorderly persons offenses, or a combination of no more than five disorderly persons and petty disorderly persons offenses, and the person does not otherwise have any subsequent conviction for a disorderly persons or petty disorderly persons offense, whether within this State or any other jurisdiction, such that the total number of convictions for disorderly persons and petty disorderly persons offenses would exceed five.

The references to an expungement “applicant” at the end of the revised 2C:52-2 statute were changed to “petitioner.” This is consistent with the formalities of an expungement proceeding. While the majority of the expungement statute amendments make it easier to obtain relief, this section adds requirements for licensed physicians and podiatrists. The term “Superior Court” was changed to “a court”, likely due to the fact that municipal courts and appellate courts can issue expungement orders under limited circumstances.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Have been very happy to share checkpoint info with friends so they can be safe and sober drivers. Thanks for a great community effort
Ron T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Antes que todo le doy las gracias señor Frederick P Sisto por representarme legalmente es usted un excelente abogado que habla con la verdad desde el principio es usted un abogado profesional que que sabe bien lo que hace ante los juzgados sin importar mi estatus legal en este país me represento con respeto y sobre todo muy profesionalmente y pudo hacer q bajaran mi delito de segundo grado a tercer grado y lo mejor que no permitió que me dieran tempo en carcel mi familia y yo estamos muy agradecidos con usted Puedo recomendar al señor abogado Frederick P Sisto como un excelente abogado y sin duda COMO UNO DE LOS MEJORES DEL ESTADO DE NEW JERSEY First of all I thank you Mister Frederick P Sisto for representing me legally you're an excellent lawyer who speaks to the truth from the beginning you are a professional lawyer who knows well what you do before the courts regardless of my legal status in this P Country I represent with respect and especially very professionally and could make Q lower my second-degree offense to third grade and the best I did not allow me to give tempo in jail my family and I are very grateful to you I can recommend Mr. Freder Attorney Ick P Sisto as an excellent lawyer and certainly as one of the best in the state of NEW JERSEY
Raul F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is a great attorney. Highly recommend. He is very trustworthy, professional, and has great communication skills, one being that he is very down to earth and makes you feel comfortable in all possibilities. I am very happy I went with him to represent me, we received the best possible outcome for our matter, while he was honest with all possibilities along the way.
Mike A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great information sharing.
Phil S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was very professional, competent, and a pleasure to deal with I cant thank him enough I highly recommend his services
Mildred T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto was a great lawyer, my outcome of my case was just how we wanted it to be. He was very good at answering phone calls and emails in a timely fashion. He was very easy to talk to and understanding of my situation. He made sure I knew all angles of the case and our best options when moving forward. I know that hiring a lawyer isnti always easy but I highly suggest Fred Sisto if you are put in the position and are in need of a lawyer.
Cory C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Worst Attorney I have ever encountered he will WASTE your time and steal your MONEY. Don't RECOMMEND!
Patric W
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Love his warnings of dwi checkpoints. Nothing but constitutionally illegal money makers.
Honkeytonk J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I highly recommend Fred. He is very knowledgeable and will look out for your interest. I am happy with the outcome of my case. I hope I don’t have to use his services again but if I did I will definitely use him again. He also has a great personality and is very personable. That’s always a plus!
Mohammad J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto was not only a knowledgeable and excellent lawyer, he was compassionate and understanding during this difficult time. I found Mr. Sisto to always be available and he services were affordable and effective. You will not find a better lawyer.
Joseph S