Contempt and Violations Of Pre-Trial Release (Part 4)

by Fred Sisto | May 4, 2019 | Blog, Legal Procedures, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

Judge Yannotti continued in relevant part: The State further argues that New Jersey’s case law confirms its ability to charge a defendant with contempt under if the defendant purposely or knowingly violates a condition in a pretrial release order. In support of that argument, the State relies upon Gandhi, 201 N.J. 161.

In Gandhi, the defendant became obsessed with a woman who rebuffed his desire for a romantic and sexual relationship. The woman filed a complaint against the defendant charging harassment, but later withdrew the complaint. The trial court nevertheless “issued an oral restraining order” directing the defendant not to have any contact with the woman.

The defendant violated the order and he was charged with stalking under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-10(c). The trial court set bail and included a no-contact directive in the bail order. Later, after the defendant violated that order, the court increased the amount of bail and expanded the scope of the no-contact directive. Thereafter, the defendant continued to violate the court’s orders.

The State filed additional charges against the defendant, and the charges included numerous counts of contempt of court based on the defendant’s violations of the no-contact requirements of the court’s orders. The defendant was tried and convicted of third-degree stalking and contempt of court.

On appeal, the defendant argued that the no-contact orders and the bail orders with no-contact provisions, were an insufficient factual basis for finding that he engaged in stalking in violation of a court order, which elevated the stalking charge from a fourth-degree to a third-degree offense. The Supreme Court rejected that argument, noting that “we insist on compliance with judicial orders to promote order and respect for the judicial process.”

It is unlikely that the Legislature considered a bail or pretrial release order as a basis for elevating a stalking charge from a fourth degree to a third-degree offense. It was likely focused on final restraining orders in domestic violence cases and their equivalents from other states.

      Excellent rating  
 Based on 288 reviews 
    
  
 
 
      Mr Sisto is an excellent lawyer. The tickets I received were nothing compared to the charges i had originally. I got the best possible outcome for my case, and Mr Sisto was incredibly understanding and patient and responded to any questions I had within about 30 minutes of me asking them. I'll be going to him again for any legal trouble I have in the future
     Brandon K 
 
 
 
 
    mr. fred sisto esq. was very professional, answered all questions i had, & made my husband & i feel more at ease about our criminal case.
     Meridith T 
 
 
 
 
    Fred never represented me but been in touch with him a few times and was a very professional experience from the minute I called the office
     Jj B 
 
 
 
 
    Fred is a very competent attorney.  He is knowledgeable, thorough, effective and possesses outstanding interpersonal skills. He provided excellent representation in my case and obtained a favorable outcome.
     Michael G 
 
 
 
 
    Fred Sisto's attention to detail, his representation and unwavering advocacy for me made all the difference in my case.
     Jill F 
 
 
 
 
    Hired Mr.Sisto to handle a case of mine a couple of months ago and while the service was okay the customer service was awful. When I had inquired about a charge I was unsure of on my bill, Mr. Sisto immediately got defensive and had the unprofessionalism to ask me if I “was high” for asking this question. I wonder if Mr. Sisto asks all of his clients this question or only the ones who have jobs in the cannabis industry? Regardless, I don’t believe this was an appropriate question to ask, regardless of the industry one works in, and therefore Mr. Sisto needs to heavily work on his customer service. Edit: Mr. Sisto had the UNPROFESSIONALISM to reach out to my family and ask them to ask me to take down my review instead of reaching out directly towards me when it was I who was his client, not my family. Clearly speaks to the unprofessionalism surrounding this practice. This has not been the only time Mr.Sisto has gone directly to my family instead of me, his client, for important legal matters and I will not seek out his services again. For those who may not understand Spanish, the email starts with “You should speak to your daughter regarding the review she has just published.” Edit to Response: As an attorney, one should be able to make appropriate questions and comments regardless if a client is “uncooperative” or “disrespectful.” The fact that rather than apologizing for the awful interaction with your firm, and I was not released  “within hours” as you claim shows how low value your firm is and how you openly  instead chose to harass my family through email for my initial review rather than actually revomy case which I ended up doing and you chareged me for . Regardless of results, your character speaks volumes and anyone who reads this would know better than to give their money to an awful person such as yourself. What a shame
     Ximena C 
 
 
 
 
    Mr. Sisto was knowledgeable preofessional and experienced. He knew the right steps to take every step of the way and went above and beyond to make sure that I understood the situation. Mr. Sisto will have your back in any legal matter!
     Corey S 
 
 
 
 
    2 👍🏻👍🏻 up
     Cc 
 
 
 
 
    Very informative. Would not hesitate to use Attorney Sisto.
     Rose C 
 
 
 
 
    Realmente es un gran abogado, me ayudo muchísimo en todo este proceso y sobre todo que habla español que es una de las cosas importantes para mi. Por que lo hizo mas entendible y facil cada una de las cosas que tenía que hacer y su amabilidad y paciencia para poder explicarme qué tenía que hacer. Además que mi caso fue un éxito gracias a él ya cada uno de sus conocimientos y a su apoyo en todo momento. Lo recomiendo 100%.
     Luis A