Controlled Substance Scheduling (Part 1)

by | Dec 10, 2019 | Blog, Criminal Law, Drug Crime, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

On October 28, 2019, a three-judge appellate panel decided the Bergen County case of State v. Joe Nicolas. The principal issue was whether the drug Alpha-PVP, also known as “flakka”, could be classified as illegal in New Jersey based on its federal classification at the time of the defendant’s arrest.

Judge Whipple authored the opinion and held in relevant part as follows: Adhering to this standard of review, we reject defendant’s argument that alpha-PVP was not considered a Schedule I CDS at the time of his arrest. The New Jersey Controlled Dangerous Substances Act (CDSA) both affords and restricts the authority of the Director of Consumer Affairs in the Department of Law and Public Safety (Director) to schedule and control certain hazardous substances. On one hand, N.J.S.A. 24:21-3(a) permits the Director to control a substance after considering eight factors concerning the substance’s potential for abuse, the scientific evidence and knowledge of the substance’s effects, and the risk to public health. However, “if any substance is designated, rescheduled or deleted as a controlled dangerous substance under federal law and notice thereof is given to the Director, the Director shall similarly control the substance . . . after the expiration of thirty days from the publication in the Federal Register.” N.J.S.A. 24:21-3(c). Should the Director “object” to the federal government’s “inclusion, rescheduling, or deletion, . . . the director shall cause to be published in the New Jersey Register and made public the reasons for his objection and shall afford all interested parties an opportunity to be heard.” Ibid.

In 2014, the Deputy Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) temporarily placed alpha-PVP in Schedule I. Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of 10 Synthetic Cathinones into Schedule I, 79 Fed. Reg. 12,938 (Mar. 7, 2014) (to be codified at 21 C.F.R. pt. 1308). A substance’s temporary designation lasts two years, and the DEA may, as it did in alpha-PVP’s case, extend the temporary scheduling for up to one more year. 21 U.S.C. § 811(h)(2); Schedules of Controlled Substances: Extension of Temporary Placement of 10 Synthetic Cathinones in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, 81 Fed. Reg. 11,429 (Mar. 4, 2016) (to be codified at 21 C.F.R. pt. 1308). The Director declined to object to the DEA’s designation of alpha-PVP in Schedule I. Thus, at the time of defendant’s 2015 arrest, alpha-PVP was a Schedule I drug under both federal and New Jersey law.

The DEA likely schedules new substances on a daily basis. The black market for drugs is very profitable and competitive. It stands to reason that there are teams of scientists working every day to modify banned substances in a way that changes there structure enough to avoid classification, while maintaining their mind-altering qualities.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Affordable, knowledgeable, efficient.
Deb W
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Highly professional The lawyer Frederick is a serious and professional person, he helped me a lot in my case, I recommend him a lot to help you too, he is always in contact with you explaining the process, a very patient and kind person.
Ca
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I recently utilized his exceptional services and would highly recommend them to anyone seeking legal advice.
Mark A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Hired Mr.Sisto to handle a case of mine a couple of months ago and while the service was okay the customer service was awful. When I had inquired about a charge I was unsure of on my bill, Mr. Sisto immediately got defensive and had the unprofessionalism to ask me if I “was high” for asking this question. I wonder if Mr. Sisto asks all of his clients this question or only the ones who have jobs in the cannabis industry? Regardless, I don’t believe this was an appropriate question to ask, regardless of the industry one works in, and therefore Mr. Sisto needs to heavily work on his customer service. Edit: Mr. Sisto had the UNPROFESSIONALISM to reach out to my family and ask them to ask me to take down my review instead of reaching out directly towards me when it was I who was his client, not my family. Clearly speaks to the unprofessionalism surrounding this practice. This has not been the only time Mr.Sisto has gone directly to my family instead of me, his client, for important legal matters and I will not seek out his services again. For those who may not understand Spanish, the email starts with “You should speak to your daughter regarding the review she has just published.” Edit to Response: As an attorney, one should be able to make appropriate questions and comments regardless if a client is “uncooperative” or “disrespectful.” The fact that rather than apologizing for the awful interaction with your firm, and I was not released “within hours” as you claim shows how low value your firm is and how you openly instead chose to harass my family through email for my initial review rather than actually revomy case which I ended up doing and you chareged me for . Regardless of results, your character speaks volumes and anyone who reads this would know better than to give their money to an awful person such as yourself. What a shame
Ximena C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is an excellent attorney. Even though we did not initiate the official pleading process, he deep dived into researching and sorted out my questions without any consultation fee. I highly recommend him!
Qianru Z
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
gives great heads up info--- and helps public get around safely
Sun B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred has helped me on two different occasions with his legal practice and is a top notch attorney. He also gives great advice as a person to go with his legal expertise. Highly recommend anyone looking for an attorney to contact Fred!
Connor W
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Keeps me well informed ! Thank you
Koy T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred has been exceptional as my counsel. Represented me with professionalism and understanding. Fred does communicate with you and gives the best he can. I recommend Fred if you need a good professional understanding straight forward counsel. Thank you Fred!
Mohammed
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great site Fred. keep up the good work at informing the public of these unlawful check points.
Mark H