Controlled Substance Scheduling (Part 2)

by Fred Sisto | Dec 12, 2019 | Blog, Criminal Law, Drug Crime, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

The Appellate Division continued in relevant part: Defendant argues alpha-PVP’s designation as such by the federal government does not necessarily mean the substance was in Schedule I under the CDSA. Rather, defendant contends that once the federal government schedules a substance, N.J.S.A. 24:21-3(c) requires the Director to either update the list of controlled substances through publication in the New Jersey Register or file an objection to the federal government’s scheduling of the substance. Because the Director never formally recognized alpha-PVP as a controlled substance after the federal government did so, defendant argues his possession of alpha-PVP was not contrary to New Jersey law at the time of his arrest.

We disagree. When the federal government schedules a substance, N.J.S.A. 24:21-3(c) gives the Director thirty days to do one of two things: (1) control the substance consistent with the federal government’s scheduling, or (2) file an objection in the New Jersey Register. Absent is a requirement that the Director give notice when he or she intends to control the substance as directed by federal law. Thus, if the Director fails to file an objection to the federal government’s scheduling within thirty days, as was the case with alpha-PVP, the Director must control the substance consonant with federal law.

The regulations promulgated by the Director confirm that substances scheduled by the federal government automatically receive the same designation under the CDSA, unless the Director objects. N.J.A.C.13:45H-1.7 provides: regulations promulgated pursuant to the United States Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, which designate, reschedule or delete a substance as a controlled substance under Federal Law, shall be deemed to be effective under the CDSA thirty days after their effective date of the Federal regulation, unless the Director, within that thirty day period, shall object to inclusion, rescheduling or deletion, which objection shall thereafter be published in the New Jersey Register.

Here, inertia works in favor of the prosecution. It is doubtful that the state authorities analyze every controlled substance that is banned by the federal government. Even if they did, there is little motivation to object to a classification of a potentially harmful drug.

      Excellent rating  
 Based on 288 reviews 
    
  
 
 
      Affordable, knowledgeable, efficient.
     Deb W 
 
 
 
 
    Highly  professional

The lawyer Frederick is a serious and professional person, he helped me a lot in my case, I recommend him a lot to help you too, he is always in contact with you explaining the process, a very patient and kind person.
     Ca 
 
 
 
 
    I recently utilized his exceptional services and would highly recommend them to anyone seeking legal advice.
     Mark A 
 
 
 
 
    Hired Mr.Sisto to handle a case of mine a couple of months ago and while the service was okay the customer service was awful. When I had inquired about a charge I was unsure of on my bill, Mr. Sisto immediately got defensive and had the unprofessionalism to ask me if I “was high” for asking this question. I wonder if Mr. Sisto asks all of his clients this question or only the ones who have jobs in the cannabis industry? Regardless, I don’t believe this was an appropriate question to ask, regardless of the industry one works in, and therefore Mr. Sisto needs to heavily work on his customer service.

Edit: Mr. Sisto had the UNPROFESSIONALISM to reach out to my family and ask them to ask me to take down my review instead of reaching out directly towards me when it was I who was his client, not my family. Clearly speaks to the unprofessionalism surrounding this practice. This has not been the only time Mr.Sisto has gone directly to my family instead of me, his client, for important legal matters and I will not seek out his services again.

For those who may not understand Spanish, the email starts with “You should speak to your daughter regarding the review she has just published.”

Edit to Response: As an attorney, one should be able to make appropriate questions and comments regardless if a client is “uncooperative” or “disrespectful.” The fact that rather than apologizing for the awful interaction with your firm, and I was not released  “within hours” as you claim shows how low value your firm is and how you openly  instead chose to harass my family through email for my initial review rather than actually revomy case which I ended up doing and you chareged me for . Regardless of results, your character speaks volumes and anyone who reads this would know better than to give their money to an awful person such as yourself. What a shame
     Ximena C 
 
 
 
 
    Fred is an excellent attorney. Even though we did not initiate the official pleading process, he deep dived into researching and sorted out my questions without any consultation fee. I highly recommend him!
     Qianru Z 
 
 
 
 
    gives great heads up info--- and helps public get around safely
     Sun B 
 
 
 
 
    Fred has helped me on two different occasions with his legal practice and is a top notch attorney. He also gives great advice as a person to go with his legal expertise. Highly recommend anyone looking for an attorney to contact Fred!
     Connor W 
 
 
 
 
    Keeps me well informed ! Thank you
     Koy T 
 
 
 
 
    Fred has been exceptional as my counsel. Represented me with professionalism and understanding. Fred does communicate with you and gives the best he can. I recommend Fred if you need a good professional understanding straight forward counsel. Thank you Fred!
     Mohammed 
 
 
 
 
    Great site Fred. keep up the good work at informing the public of these unlawful check points.
     Mark H