Facebook and the Wiretap Statute (Part 1)

by | Apr 1, 2024 | Blog, Criminal Law, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

On June 29, 2023, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided the consolidated Mercer and Atlantic County cases of Facebook v. State of New Jersey. The principal issue before the Court concerned whether a wiretap order was required to compel Facebook to disclose user account info every 15 minutes for 30 days.

Chief Justice Rabner wrote for the unanimous Court in relevant part: The Court considers whether Facebook can be compelled to provide the contents of two users’ accounts every 15 minutes for 30 days into the future based only on probable cause, the ordinary standard for a search warrant, or whether the State must instead satisfy certain requirements and apply for a wiretap order, which requires an enhanced showing — one beyond probable cause — because gaining access to private communications in real time is considerably more intrusive than a typical search.

The 15-minute delay is because of technical limitations; it is as fast as Facebook can provide the information. Even though it seeks extensive information from private user accounts that does not yet exist, in as close to real time as possible, the State argues that, considering the 15-minute delay, it is obtaining “stored communications,” which do not require a wiretap order. Nowhere else in the nation has law enforcement sought prospective communications from Facebook users’ accounts without presenting a wiretap order. In the two matters under review, trial courts quashed the State’s request for prospective information based on a Communications Data Warrant (CDW), which is the equivalent of a search warrant and can be issued on a showing of probable cause. The Appellate Division consolidated the cases and held that the State could obtain prospective electronic communications with a CDW, reasoning that the wiretap statute applied to the contemporaneous interception of electronic communications, not efforts to access communications in storage. 471 N.J. Super. 430, 455-56, 459 (App. Div. 2022).

To ensure compliance “with the federal and state constitutions and New Jersey’s warrant procedures,” however, the Appellate Division imposed a 10-day limit on the duration of the CDWs, importing the shorter deadline from Rule 3:5-5(a), which sets a time limit for the execution of search warrants. Id. at 463, 465. The Court granted Facebook leave to appeal, 251 N.J. 378 (2022), and the State leave to cross-appeal the 10-day limit, 252 N.J. 36 (2022).

The fact that no other Court in the country has granted such a request from the State should weigh heavily in favor of Facebook. New Jersey has historically provided greater constitutional protections than most states and the federal constitution.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto handled my case very well. I was happy with outcome. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend him to any of my friends or family.
David V
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a detail minded attorney that works tirelessly to get the job done right. If you need help Fred knows how to take care of your issues. Fred has years of experience and will work hard for justice for his clients. Fred is easy to talk to and has great communication skills!
Gibson H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
For the people. For the little guy My legal bully
Glennlykesmusic
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred always publishes where local DWI Checkpoints are going to be! He is also a very prominent Attorney in the Ocean County areas of Point Pleasent and Now a new Brick office!
Michael K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
The DUI checkpoint alerts have been exceptional. Much needed work to bring attention to the unconstitutional searches.
Daniel K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very knowledgeable with expungement!!! Thanks again!!!
Nicole B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Like clockwork thank you for all the info
Lee M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am writing to share my experience working with Fred From the very beginning, he provided outstanding service and demonstrated a high level of professionalism. He was attentive to my needs, communicated clearly, and always made sure I understood each step of the process. What impressed me most was his efficiency—he handled my case quickly without compromising on quality. His dedication and expertise gave me confidence and peace of mind throughout the entire process. I highly recommend Fred to anyone seeking reliable and effective legal support. His commitment to his clients and ability to deliver results promptly truly set him apart.
Aida F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Frederick is a pleasure to work with,great family guy. Fred pays attention to every detail and is totally accessible.
Tom A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Not to long ago I ran into a very serious legal issue for the first time in my life, I'm closing in on 60. Needless to say I was unsure of the process. I was fortunate that a friend recommended Fred. Fred handled my case in a professional and courteous manner yet was very down to earth and straight forward. It took nearly 9 month to resolve and during that time Fred was always available to answer questions, explain the process and most of all alleviate my stress. I feel we got the best possible outcome and I would highly recommend Fred to anyone facing a legal/criminal matter
Manny P