Inevitable Discovery and Independent Source Doctrines (Part 1)

by | Jun 23, 2019 | Blog, Criminal Law

On May 13, 2019, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided the Monmouth County case of State v. Nathan Shaw. The principal issues involved the applications of the inevitable discover and independent source doctrines.

Justice Timpone wrote for a unanimous Court and held as follows: In this case, the Court considers whether evidence found in a motel room and vehicle and defendant Nathan Shaw’s statement to police should have been suppressed. Jasmine Hanson was staying at the Crystal Inn motel in Neptune City. She called the front desk to complain she had been bitten by bed bugs. The motel owner inspected Hanson’s room using his pass key. He saw a plastic bag containing what he suspected were narcotics and called the police. Officer Jason Rademacher had the motel owner lead him to Hanson’s room where, again using his pass key, the motel owner unlocked the door for the officer to enter. Inside, Rademacher saw what appeared to be drugs, as well as a measuring cup and scale. A criminal history check on Hanson revealed an outstanding traffic warrant and a recently issued traffic summons on a 2012 black Chevrolet Tahoe, and its plate number.

Rademacher transported the evidence to the station and returned in an unmarked vehicle to wait for Hanson’s arrival. Shortly thereafter, the black Tahoe pulled into a parking space. The front passenger was Keon Bolden, Hanson was in the driver’s seat, and in the back seat were Shakera Dickerson and Shaw. Rademacher arrested Hanson. The officer asked to search the Tahoe; Hanson refused consent. A drug-detection canine was brought to perform an exterior sniff of the vehicle.  The officers conducted warrant checks on the remaining passengers. Only Dickerson’s came back positive.  She was arrested and placed in a second patrol car.  Shaw and Bolden were patted down and seated in separate patrol cars, uncuffed. Hanson again refused to consent to a search of the vehicle.

The way that these drugs were seized by the police is fundamentally unfair to the defendant. Logic dictates that she did not reasonably expect that the hotel owner would enter her room after she left or she would have put her drugs away. The owner likely watched her leave, then entered without permission, then saw a way to have her evicted from the room after taking her money by calling the police about drugs as opposed to remedying the bed bug issue.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very good
Nazario B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I retained Mr. Sisto to assist with a speeding ticket I received on the NJ Turnpike. When we spoke on the phone, he explained my options in a very clear, easy to understand manner. Speaking from experience, Mr. Sisto made a recommendation on how to get the ticket reduced and I agreed. He then contacted the municipal court to set a date for my appearance. On the day of my appearance, Mr. Sisto met me at the courthouse and reviewed what was going to happen. Upon entering the courtroom he sought out the borough attorney and arranged for the ticket to be reduced. We were done in ten minutes. I was just going to pay the ticket and take the two points. I am glad I contacted Mr. Sisto. He really helped me out
Michael G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I love the insight! It helps to keep my kids out of troubel!
Michael G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto handled my case very well. I was happy with outcome. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend him to any of my friends or family.
David V
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is extremely knowledgeable and so helpful. I would recommend him to anyone. He really goes above and beyond. He cares about his work and his clients.
Kevin M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I was very pleased with my representation by Fred Sisto. He is very honest and explained everything to me in detail. I would recommend him to anybody who is seeking legal representation..
Jeff M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
....and his Dog Gonzo is a great attorney.
Duane H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Estoy realmente satisfecho con el excelente trabajo que hizo el abogo en mi caso de DIU. Agradecido por que el caso fue un éxito, ya que además tiene mucho conocimiento en estos casos y no dudo que en otros casos también. Lo recomiendo totalmente.
Luis A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred, Thank you for the notifications on the DUI stops.
Joe F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred will fight for you all the way.
Peter