Municipal Court Diversion Programs (Part 2)

by | Jan 30, 2016 | Blog, Criminal Law, News

2C:43-13.1. Eligibility and Application. a. Eligibility and Application. Whenever any defendant who has not been previously convicted of any petty disorderly persons offense, disorderly persons offense or crime under any law of the United States, this State or any other state, and who has not previously participated in conditional discharge under N.J.S.2C:36A-1, supervisory treatment under N.J.S.2C:43-12, or conditional dismissal under P.L.2013, c.158 (C.2C:43-13.1 et al.), is charged with a petty disorderly offense or disorderly persons offense except as provided in subsection b. of this section, the defendant may, after a plea of guilty or a finding of guilt, but prior to the entry of a judgment of conviction and with appropriate notice to the prosecutor, apply to the court for entry into the conditional dismissal program pursuant to the requirements of P.L.2013, c.158 (C.2C:43-13.1 et al.). As a condition of such application, the defendant shall submit to the fingerprint identification procedures as provided in R.S.53:1-15 before making such application to the court to allow sufficient time for verification of the defendant’s criminal history by the prosecutor.

Paragraph (a) addresses the required guilty plea that is a pre-condition to the conditional dismissal program. Note that the program is also available to defendants after they are found guilty at trial. Thus, it would appear that defendants interested in the program would have nothing to lose by going to trial and giving themselves a shot at a “not guilty” finding and dismissal. However, as a practical matter, demanding a trial will almost always lead to additional court dates, time spent waiting at court, and additional legal fees incurred while the state delays in presenting their case. These delays are sometimes caused by unforeseeable issues with witness availability or a court’s busy calendar. More often, the delays are intentionally used by the state with the hope that a defendant will get tired of spending their time and money and will agree to a disposition that does not require the state to conduct a trial. Additionally, courts are vested with some discretion regarding who can participate in the program. There are some judges that would use this discretion to keep a defendant out of the program if the defendant forced the court and state to conduct a trial in a case in which the court found the proofs of the offense(s) to be very strong. This use/abuse of discretion is commonly referred to as a “trial tax”.

Note that the conditional dismissal program is also more restrictive of who can participate with regard to prior records of convictions. The conditional discharge program is available to anyone who has not been convicted of a drug offense (and who has not already participated in a diversionary program). A conviction for any petty disorderly persons or disorderly persons offenses, whether or not the offense is drug-related, is a bar to the conditional dismissal program.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was excellent and helped my son deal with a issue in PPB, despite being a long distance away. He is very thorough and knows how to navigate the ins and outs of the local legal waters.
Bruces
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
always feel better knowing I don't need to be stopped when I haven't done anything wrong it's a great service and gives me peace of mint
Liesel T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Called back within 10 minutes,very easy to talk to. Not judgmental at all. I am hopeful about the outcome.
Colleen H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fantastic lawyer, I had two charges that were thankfully dropped thanks to Fred. If you're looking for a great lawyer, Fred Sisto is the guy to call. 5 stars. Thank you Fred Sisto.
Dan M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I called Mr. Sisto a few weeks back and he returned the call immediately! I asked a few questions and he clearly explained the options for one of my employees. He then followed up with a detailed proposal. He was completely knowledgeable, helpful and insightful. If I ever had to use him I would feel VERY comfortable with his representation.
Dave P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred sisto was an absolute life saver in my case I would recommend him to anyone in the future if needed.
Nelson C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great that Fred posts DUI for Monmouth County!
David F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I recently retained Mr. Fred Sisto to represent my son regarding a very serious legal matter. If not handled correctly these charges could have resulted in bad consequences for my son's future prospects. Mr. Sisto's knowledge of the criminal justice system is evident since he was able to get all charges dropped as well as getting them expunged from his record. If you need a criminal justice attorney who will respond quickly to all your questions and concern,as well as achieve a satisfactory solution to your case I strongly recommend Attorney Fred Sisto.
Joseph M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
That’s my lawyer he’s the greatest
Donald J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred was incredibly helpful during a very stressful time. Even during a pandemic he was fast at responding to any and all questions or problems that I had. He went above and beyond to make sure that I was happy with my results and that my case was being handled properly all the way through. Highly recommend this office!
Toni V