Municipal Court Diversion Programs (Part 3)

by | Feb 1, 2016 | Blog, Criminal Law, News

b. (1) A defendant shall not be eligible for participation in the conditional dismissal program if the offense for which the person is charged involved: (a) organized criminal or gang activity; (b) a continuing criminal business or enterprise; (c) a breach of the public trust by a public officer or employee; (d) domestic violence as defined by subsection a. of section 3 of P.L.1991, c.261 (C.2C:25-19); (e) an offense against an elderly, disabled or minor person; (f) an offense involving driving or operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, intoxicating liquor, narcotic, hallucinogenic or habit-producing drug; (g) a violation of animal cruelty laws; or (h) any disorderly persons offense or petty disorderly persons offense under chapter 35 or 36 of Title 2C.

Section (b) lays out additional bars to participation in the conditional dismissal program which do not apply to the conditional discharge program. Sub-sections (a) through (c) will very rarely be present with municipal court offenses. Those sub-sections address aspects that are almost strictly limited to indictable offenses such as racketeering and official misconduct. Sub-section (d) will bar the participation of many defendants who are charged with simple assault or harassment related to a domestic dispute. Sub-section (e) can bar anyone charged with a petty theft against an elderly person, which would most likely be defined as someone age 60 or older, consistent with 2C:44-1a (12).

Sub-section (f) can arguably bar participation for defendants who are charged with a disorderly person offense on the same occasion as they are charged with a DUI. I say “arguably” because it is not clear what is meant by the phrase “an offense involving.” Does having marijuana drug paraphernalia in the car at the time of a DUI charge for alcohol mean that the marijuana paraphernalia is an “offense involving driving under the influence of alcohol?” What if the basis for the DUI is marijuana intoxication but the marijuana paraphernalia that is found in the car was not the specific paraphernalia that was used on the date in question? Sub-section (g) is probably superfluous with the recent push to have animal cruelty offenses punished more severely as felonies since felonies cannot be resolved in a municipal court. Sub-section (h) codifies the fact that marijuana and drug paraphernalia offenses are addressed by the long-standing conditional discharge program, as opposed to the conditional dismissal program.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto was not only a knowledgeable and excellent lawyer, he was compassionate and understanding during this difficult time. I found Mr. Sisto to always be available and he services were affordable and effective. You will not find a better lawyer.
Joseph S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Estoy realmente satisfecho con el excelente trabajo que hizo el abogo en mi caso de DIU. Agradecido por que el caso fue un éxito, ya que además tiene mucho conocimiento en estos casos y no dudo que en otros casos también. Lo recomiendo totalmente.
Luis A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
For the people. For the little guy My legal bully
Glennlykesmusic
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great location
John G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Current Pre law students and I had a question pertaining to a certain scenario in class. He responded back and gave me a case that broke down exactly what I asked for.
Chad T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very knowledgeable with expungement!!! Thanks again!!!
Nicole B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Called back within 10 minutes,very easy to talk to. Not judgmental at all. I am hopeful about the outcome.
Colleen H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
On time and on point. Very knowledgeable
Ron T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto and his entire staff were courteous, professional and got our case handled quickly and to the best outcome. Great lawyer. Highly recommend.
Bryan B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am writing to share my experience working with Fred From the very beginning, he provided outstanding service and demonstrated a high level of professionalism. He was attentive to my needs, communicated clearly, and always made sure I understood each step of the process. What impressed me most was his efficiency—he handled my case quickly without compromising on quality. His dedication and expertise gave me confidence and peace of mind throughout the entire process. I highly recommend Fred to anyone seeking reliable and effective legal support. His commitment to his clients and ability to deliver results promptly truly set him apart.
Aida F