Municipal Court Diversion Programs (Part 4)

by | Feb 3, 2016 | Blog, Criminal Law, News

(2) Nothing in this act shall preclude a defendant charged with any disorderly persons offense or petty disorderly persons offense under chapter 35 or 36 of Title 2C from applying to the court for admission into the conditional discharge program in accordance with N.J.S. 2C:36A-1.

In addition to the eligibility criteria enumerated in this section, the court shall consider the following factors:

 

(1) The nature and circumstances of the offense;

(2) The facts surrounding the commission of the offense;

(3) The motivation, age, character and attitude of the defendant;

(4) The desire of the complainant or victim to forgo prosecution;

(5) The needs and interests of the victim and the community;

(6) The extent to which the defendant’s offense constitutes part of a continuing pattern of anti-social behavior;

(7) Whether the offense is of an assaultive or violent nature, whether in the act itself or in the possible injurious consequences of such behavior;

(8) Whether the applicant’s participation will adversely affect the prosecution of codefendants;

(9) Whether diversion of the defendant from prosecution is consistent with the public interest; and

(10) Any other factors deemed relevant by the court.

 

Note that the ten factors in section c are modeled off of the superior court’s PTI eligibility criteria. However, as a practical matter, they will rarely be considered because municipal courts do not have the superior court’s resources. Thus, while a probation officer conducts a background interview and research regarding defendants seeking PTI acceptance, no such interview or research occurs at the municipal court level. Thus, defendants who are not precluded by the criteria in sub-section b will by and large be accepted to the conditional dismissal program.

Program participants will be under probation monitoring for one year and be subject to monetary obligations and may be subject to other conditions imposed by the court.
While the prosecutor has notice of the application, an opportunity to object and the right to appeal, discretion as to granting an application is the court’s. Presumably, the standard on appeal is the same as that for any other sentencing decision by a court, not the “abuse of discretion” standard in PTI appeals.

2C:43-13.4. Violation of Terms Prior to Dismissal. Violation of Terms Prior To Dismissal. If a defendant who is participating in the conditional dismissal program is convicted of any petty disorderly persons offense, disorderly persons offense or crime under any law of the United States, this State or any other state, or otherwise fails to comply with the terms and conditions imposed by the court, the court may enter a judgment of conviction and impose a fine, penalty, or other assessment which may be imposed by the court in accordance with the defendant’s prior plea of guilty or finding of guilt.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto was not only a knowledgeable and excellent lawyer, he was compassionate and understanding during this difficult time. I found Mr. Sisto to always be available and he services were affordable and effective. You will not find a better lawyer.
Joseph S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Estoy realmente satisfecho con el excelente trabajo que hizo el abogo en mi caso de DIU. Agradecido por que el caso fue un éxito, ya que además tiene mucho conocimiento en estos casos y no dudo que en otros casos también. Lo recomiendo totalmente.
Luis A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
For the people. For the little guy My legal bully
Glennlykesmusic
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great location
John G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Current Pre law students and I had a question pertaining to a certain scenario in class. He responded back and gave me a case that broke down exactly what I asked for.
Chad T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very knowledgeable with expungement!!! Thanks again!!!
Nicole B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Called back within 10 minutes,very easy to talk to. Not judgmental at all. I am hopeful about the outcome.
Colleen H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
On time and on point. Very knowledgeable
Ron T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto and his entire staff were courteous, professional and got our case handled quickly and to the best outcome. Great lawyer. Highly recommend.
Bryan B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am writing to share my experience working with Fred From the very beginning, he provided outstanding service and demonstrated a high level of professionalism. He was attentive to my needs, communicated clearly, and always made sure I understood each step of the process. What impressed me most was his efficiency—he handled my case quickly without compromising on quality. His dedication and expertise gave me confidence and peace of mind throughout the entire process. I highly recommend Fred to anyone seeking reliable and effective legal support. His commitment to his clients and ability to deliver results promptly truly set him apart.
Aida F