Fred Sisto | Criminal Attorney | Ocean and Monmouth County

Call Us Today
732-898-3232

  • Home
  • Criminal Defense Services
    ▼
    • Drug Crimes
      ▼
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Intent to Distribute Narcotics
      • Prescription Drug Crimes
      • Leader of Narcotics Trafficking Network
    • Weapons Charges
      ▼
      • Prohibited Weapons and Devices
      • Manufacture, Transport, etc. of Weapons
      • Illegal Possession of a Gun
      • Possession of Weapons for Unlawful Purposes
    • Expungements
    • Theft Attorney
    • Violent Crimes
      ▼
      • Robbery/Burglary
      • Manslaughter
      • Extortion
      • Assault
      • Sexual Offenses
    • Arson
    • DUI / DWI
      ▼
      • Alcohol DUI
      • Drug DUI
      • Refusing a Breath Test
    • Driving with A Suspended License
    • Property Forfeiture
    • Anti-Drug Profiteering
    • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Español / Spanish Speaking Attorney
  • About
    ▼
    • Testimonials
    • Defending Cases In
      ▼
      • Monmouth County
      • Ocean County
  • Blog
  • Contact
    ▼
    • Receive a Call From Fred
  • DUI Checkpoint Alerts
  • Results
  • Payment Options
  • Home
  • Criminal Defense Services
    • Drug Crimes
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Intent to Distribute Narcotics
      • Prescription Drug Crimes
      • Leader of Narcotics Trafficking Network
    • Weapons Charges
      • Prohibited Weapons and Devices
      • Manufacture, Transport, etc. of Weapons
      • Illegal Possession of a Gun
      • Possession of Weapons for Unlawful Purposes
    • Expungements
    • Theft Attorney
    • Violent Crimes
      • Robbery/Burglary
      • Manslaughter
      • Extortion
      • Assault
      • Sexual Offenses
    • Arson
    • DUI / DWI
      • Alcohol DUI
      • Drug DUI
      • Refusing a Breath Test
    • Driving with A Suspended License
    • Property Forfeiture
    • Anti-Drug Profiteering
    • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Español / Spanish Speaking Attorney
  • About
    • Testimonials
    • Defending Cases In
      • Monmouth County
      • Ocean County
  • Blog
  • Contact
    • Receive a Call From Fred
  • DUI Checkpoint Alerts
  • Results
  • Payment Options
Home >> Municipal Court Diversion Programs (Part 1)

January 28, 2016 by Fred Sisto

Municipal Court Diversion Programs (Part 1)

Regarding municipal court diversions programs, there are two. The newer prgram that was signed into law in 2013 is the “conditional dismissal program.” It is relatively new program designed to divert disorderly persons offenses unrelated to marijuana and drug paraphernalia. The latter two offenses are addressed by the other municipal court diversion program, the conditional discharge.

Like the superior court’s pretrial intervention program (PTI), the municipal court programs usually involve some sort of supervision by the county’s probation department. However, the oversight and conditions of the supervision with the municipal court programs tend to be much less rigorous. Typically, a program participant is called upon one time to pass a drug test. Sometimes, that call never comes and the “oversight” is presumably limited to the county probation department’s making sure the participant is not charged with any new offenses. Another difference between the superior court and municipal court diversion programs is the length of supervision which is typically one to three years at the superior court level, but never more than a year at the municipal court level.

Whereas the conditional discharge program is often over-used, i.e. used by attorneys who fail to recognize that a conviction for a municipal court offense is often less harmful than a diversion, the newer conditional dismissal program is, as this writer predicted, almost never used. This is due to two principle reasons.

First, the long-standing conditional discharge program is a way to divert drug-related charges that most prosecutors are very hesitant to downgrade or amend. The Attorney General specifically prohibits municipal prosecutors from amending marijuana or drug paraphernalia charges unless a detailed set of conditions are satisfied. On the other hand, there is no such longstanding prohibition against amending or downgrading disorderly persons offenses unrelated to marijuana or drug paraphernalia. Therefore, municipal prosecutors have much more discretion with regard to offering downgrades to local ordinance violations when the offense at issue does not involve marijuana or drug paraphernalia. Since most people would prefer to pay an ordinance fine and be done with their case without any supervision from the probation department, an ordinance remains a much more attractive alternative to the conditional dismissal program.

The second principle reason that the conditional dismissal program is not nearly as popular as the conditional discharge program is that the conditional dismissal program requires an admission of guilt as a pre-requisite to participation. While this requirement is merely an inconvenience to some, it makes the program all-but-worthless to undocumented citizens who could be deported by virtue of the guilty plea, even if the charge is ultimately going to be dismissed upon successful completion of the program. On the other hand, the conditional discharge program does not require an admission of guilt. Note that judges and prosecutors do retain the discretion to require a guilty plea with the conditional discharge program, but this discretion is very rarely exercised.

Note further that it is not just undocumented citizens that can be adversely affected by the conditional dismissal program’s guilty plea requirement. Anyone who enters a guilty plea and then violates a condition of the program has their case returned to court for sentencing since they have already pleaded guilty. On the other hand, people who fail out of a diversionary program without entering a guilty plea have their case returned to court where they are still free to fight the charges. A conditional discharge without a guilty plea thus provides an additional buffer between the defendant and a potential jail sentence, a buffer that is unavailable through the conditional dismissal program.

Filed Under: Blog, Criminal Law, News Tagged With: Criminal Law, Legal Procedures

Testimonials

Fred is a stickler for detail and communicates with clients very, very well. He is smart and astute. I would recommend him unconditionally.

Tom O   

I would highly recommend Mr. Sisto. He is very insightful and proficient, yet still down to Earth. Fred is great at communicating and breaking down the facts. But most importantly, he excels at getting results.

Bill K   

Thanks to Fred I have no criminal record whatsoever.

Luke A   

Great!!! , got my case handled in the exact manner that I was told and would recommend to everyone else in need of legal representation.

Raumelis R   
See More Testimonials

Recent Posts

  • Plea Agreements and New Charges (Part 2)
  • Plea Agreements and New Charges (Part 1)
  • Youth and Withholding Imprisonment (Part 2)
  • Youth and Withholding Imprisonment (Part 1)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 4)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 3)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 2)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 1)

Recent Speaking Engagement

Site Disclaimer

Attorney Referral Fees

Frederick P Sisto has earned Lawyer Legion's recognition for Community Leadership
 
Top Criminal Defense Attorney in Brick

Law Office of Frederick P. Sisto

Point Pleasant Office*:
302 Hawthorne Ave, Suite 1
Point Pleasant Beach, NJ 08742

Brick Township Office*:
223 Drum Point Road, Suite 1
Brick Township, NJ 08723

Sea Girt Office*:
2150 NJ-35,
Suite 225
Sea Girt, NJ 08750

Phone: 732-898-3232
Fax: 201-508-3393
*Office visits by appointment only.

Representing clients throughout all court jurisdictions of New Jersey.

WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CRIMINAL TRIAL ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION, NO ASPECT OF THIS ADVERTISEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

en English
en Englishes Spanish