Fred Sisto | Criminal Attorney | Ocean and Monmouth County

Call Us Today
732-898-3232

  • Home
  • Criminal Defense Services
    ▼
    • Drug Crimes
      ▼
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Intent to Distribute Narcotics
      • Prescription Drug Crimes
      • Leader of Narcotics Trafficking Network
    • Weapons Charges
      ▼
      • Prohibited Weapons and Devices
      • Manufacture, Transport, etc. of Weapons
      • Illegal Possession of a Gun
      • Possession of Weapons for Unlawful Purposes
    • Expungements
    • Theft Attorney
    • Violent Crimes
      ▼
      • Robbery/Burglary
      • Manslaughter
      • Extortion
      • Assault
      • Sexual Offenses
    • Arson
    • DUI / DWI
      ▼
      • Alcohol DUI
      • Drug DUI
      • Refusing a Breath Test
    • Driving with A Suspended License
    • Property Forfeiture
    • Anti-Drug Profiteering
    • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Español / Spanish Speaking Attorney
  • About
    ▼
    • Testimonials
    • Defending Cases In
      ▼
      • Monmouth County
      • Ocean County
  • Blog
  • Contact
    ▼
    • Receive a Call From Fred
  • DUI Checkpoint Alerts
  • Results
  • Payment Options
  • Home
  • Criminal Defense Services
    • Drug Crimes
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Intent to Distribute Narcotics
      • Prescription Drug Crimes
      • Leader of Narcotics Trafficking Network
    • Weapons Charges
      • Prohibited Weapons and Devices
      • Manufacture, Transport, etc. of Weapons
      • Illegal Possession of a Gun
      • Possession of Weapons for Unlawful Purposes
    • Expungements
    • Theft Attorney
    • Violent Crimes
      • Robbery/Burglary
      • Manslaughter
      • Extortion
      • Assault
      • Sexual Offenses
    • Arson
    • DUI / DWI
      • Alcohol DUI
      • Drug DUI
      • Refusing a Breath Test
    • Driving with A Suspended License
    • Property Forfeiture
    • Anti-Drug Profiteering
    • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Español / Spanish Speaking Attorney
  • About
    • Testimonials
    • Defending Cases In
      • Monmouth County
      • Ocean County
  • Blog
  • Contact
    • Receive a Call From Fred
  • DUI Checkpoint Alerts
  • Results
  • Payment Options
Home >> Pre-Trial Intervention Program (PTI) – (Part 3)

February 9, 2016 by Fred Sisto

Pre-Trial Intervention Program (PTI) – (Part 3)

To overcome a program director’s PTI denial, the accused must establish arbitrary or capricious conduct amounting to an abuse of discretion, by a preponderance of the evidence. State v. Lopes, 289 N.J. Super. 460, 478-79 (Law Div. 1995). The preponderance of the evidence standard, as opposed to “clear and convincing evidence” should apply when the prosecution does not joined in the PTI Director’s denial. If a prosecutor is going to withhold consent to admission, she must provide specific reasons for doing so. State v. Atley, 157 N.J. Super. 157 (App. Div. 1978). The decision must be reduced to writing and disclosed to the defendant. R. 3:28, Guideline 8.

For a PTI director’s decision to constitute “arbitrary or capricious” conduct amounting to an “abuse of discretion”, the defendant must demonstrate that the decision: (a) failed to address all relevant factors; (b) was based on irrelevant or inappropriate factors; or (c) constituted a clear error of judgment. Lopes, at 479; See also State v. Nwobu, 139 N.J. 236, 247 (1995)(describing the standard for overcoming a prosecutor’s PTI denial).

A common basis for PTI rejection, as alluded to above, is as follows: “Guideline 3(i) which indicates that a defendant charged with the sale or dispensing of Schedule I or II narcotic drugs by persons not drug dependent should ordinarily not be considered for enrollment except on joint application by the defendant and the prosecutor.”

The most commonly used and “distributed” controlled substance is marijuana. The fact that distribution of less than one ounce of marijuana is classified as a fourth degree offense, whereas the distribution of a minuscule amount of most every other controlled substance is a more serious third degree crime. This anomaly lends itself to some helpful arguments on appeal. Consider the following example.

Marijuana is unique from all other “Schedule I or II narcotics” in that providing less than one ounce of it is classified as minor, fourth degree offense, as opposed to a more serious felony. N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5(b)(1) through (12); N.J.S.A. 2C:6-1. If an applicant charged with fourth degree marijuana distribution were charged with any lower level of offense, he would not be considered for PTI because his offense would not be serious enough. With a lower level of offense, the Superior Court would not have jurisdiction because he would not be facing “a potential sentence of consequence.” R. 3:28, Guideline 3(d); Rodriguez v. Rosenblatt, 58 N.J. 281 (1971).

Filed Under: Blog, Criminal Law, News Tagged With: Criminal Law, Legal Procedures

Testimonials

Fred is a stickler for detail and communicates with clients very, very well. He is smart and astute. I would recommend him unconditionally.

Tom O   

I would highly recommend Mr. Sisto. He is very insightful and proficient, yet still down to Earth. Fred is great at communicating and breaking down the facts. But most importantly, he excels at getting results.

Bill K   

Thanks to Fred I have no criminal record whatsoever.

Luke A   

Great!!! , got my case handled in the exact manner that I was told and would recommend to everyone else in need of legal representation.

Raumelis R   
See More Testimonials

Recent Posts

  • Plea Agreements and New Charges (Part 1)
  • Youth and Withholding Imprisonment (Part 2)
  • Youth and Withholding Imprisonment (Part 1)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 4)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 3)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 2)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 1)
  • Jurisdiction and Subsequent Prosecutions (Part 2)

Recent Speaking Engagement

Site Disclaimer

Attorney Referral Fees

Frederick P Sisto has earned Lawyer Legion's recognition for Community Leadership
 
Top Criminal Defense Attorney in Brick

Law Office of Frederick P. Sisto

Point Pleasant Office*:
302 Hawthorne Ave, Suite 1
Point Pleasant Beach, NJ 08742

Brick Township Office*:
223 Drum Point Road, Suite 1
Brick Township, NJ 08723

Sea Girt Office*:
2150 NJ-35,
Suite 225
Sea Girt, NJ 08750

Phone: 732-898-3232
Fax: 201-508-3393
*Office visits by appointment only.

Representing clients throughout all court jurisdictions of New Jersey.

WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CRIMINAL TRIAL ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION, NO ASPECT OF THIS ADVERTISEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

en English
en Englishes Spanish