Recovery Court Rejections (Part 1)

by | Jul 5, 2023 | Blog, Criminal Law, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

Recovery Court RejectionsOn January 17, 2023, Administrative Directive 01-23 was issued. It promulgates a revised list of legal rejection codes used in eCourts for Recovery Court. The updated list limits the reasons for rejection from admission into the program to those specifically set forth in the statute (N.J.S.A. 2C:35-14a) or Recovery Court manual.

The existing codes had remained largely unchanged since the inception of the then Drug Court program in 2002. The updated list limits the reasons for legal rejections to those specifically set forth either in the statute or in the Recovery Court manual. The revisions more clearly identify the specific reasons for which a potential Recovery Court client is being legally rejected from admission into the program. The current broad rejection reason of “Statute” is being eliminated.

Prosecutors now will be required to indicate whether a case being reviewed is Track One or Track Two. For Track One, the specific permissible rejection reasons are outlined in the statute. For Track Two, the rejection reasons are not from the statute, but rather are from the manual. Eliminated as acceptable legal rejection reasons/codes are those not set forth either in the manual or the statute. For example, clients no longer can be rejected for program admission because they have previously been in the program or because of a “co-defendant issue.” Also, the legal rejection reason of “immigration status” has been made more precise as “immigration detainer.” By making these reasons for legal rejections more specific and more directly tied to the provisions of the statute or the manual, Recovery Court will be able to better monitor and identify any equity issues in the application and admission process.

The revised list of rejection codes reads as follows:

1. Track One – Prior violent conviction bar- N.J.S.A. 2C:35-14a(7)

a. T1 Prior violent conviction bar
b. T1 Prior Violent

2. Track One – Two or more prior convictions – N.J.S.A. 2C:35-14a(6)

a. T1 Two or more prior conviction
b. T1 2+ Priors

On its face, it seems that reason 2 would bar most Recovery Court applicants. A closer look at the statute reveals that it is only certain circumstances and first or second-degree prior convictions that act as a bar. The relevant statute reads as follows: “the person has not been previously convicted on two or more separate occasions of crimes of the first or second degree, other than those listed in paragraph (7); or the person has not been previously convicted on two or more separate occasions, where one of the offenses is a crime of the third degree, other than crimes defined in N.J.S. 2C:35-10, and one of the offenses is a crime of the first or second degree.”

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Especially given the situations we had to work under right now with COVID-19, I am glad to have had Fred Sisto represent me. The outcome was much better than anticipated, and he always ensured to maintain proper communication, including not going any further until you 100% understood what's going on, and made a point to keep me updated as much as possible with any of the incoming changes due to quarantine (which was confusing for me at first). Always has your best interests in mind, and an all-around great attorney and person.
Mel C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a detail minded attorney that works tirelessly to get the job done right. If you need help Fred knows how to take care of your issues. Fred has years of experience and will work hard for justice for his clients. Fred is easy to talk to and has great communication skills!
Gibson H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
We retained Fred to represent our daughter. He was amazing from our first phone call. He led us through the process and assured us that all would be taken care of. He was absolutely wonderful with our daughter. We couldn’t have asked for a better outcome. Thank you Fred from the bottom of our hearts. If you need a criminal attorney Fred Sisto Esq. is your guy. Trust me you won’t be disappointed.
Sherry F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I have sought out Mr. Sisto for two traffic related cases. His hard work and dedication to getting results for me was very evident from the get go. He was very informative throughout the entire process of working on my cases and during the court sessions as well. Very professional and very friendly. If anyone in the area is looking for a very good and quality representation, Mr. Sisto is a go to.
Brett S
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I was very content with Fred’s services. He was extremely communicative throughout the entire process and I am happy with our results.
Lidia D
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is a great attorney. Highly recommend. He is very trustworthy, professional, and has great communication skills, one being that he is very down to earth and makes you feel comfortable in all possibilities. I am very happy I went with him to represent me, we received the best possible outcome for our matter, while he was honest with all possibilities along the way.
Mike A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Even though I didn't end up using Fred; I had the best experience from him out of anyone I called for a consultation. He was very clear and consise, made sure I understood my options for the situation I was faced with. He ultimately gave me the confidence to go to court pro se for my case. I also get weekly emails now that are extremely helpful and include a wealth of information for goings on around my area.
Warren C
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred's services has been more than exceptional. He provided updates on my case. He got me one of the best outcomes i could have asked for, and has represented me twice with amazing results. Fred can work his magic on your case just as he did for me
Chris K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is an excellent attorney. Even though we did not initiate the official pleading process, he deep dived into researching and sorted out my questions without any consultation fee. I highly recommend him!
Qianru Z
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great service
Kelly G