Fred Sisto | Criminal Attorney | Ocean and Monmouth County

Call Us Today
732-898-3232

  • Home
  • Criminal Defense Services
    ▼
    • Drug Crimes
      ▼
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Intent to Distribute Narcotics
      • Prescription Drug Crimes
      • Leader of Narcotics Trafficking Network
    • Weapons Charges
      ▼
      • Prohibited Weapons and Devices
      • Manufacture, Transport, etc. of Weapons
      • Illegal Possession of a Gun
      • Possession of Weapons for Unlawful Purposes
    • Expungements
    • Theft Attorney
    • Violent Crimes
      ▼
      • Robbery/Burglary
      • Manslaughter
      • Extortion
      • Assault
      • Sexual Offenses
    • Arson
    • DUI / DWI
      ▼
      • Alcohol DUI
      • Drug DUI
      • Refusing a Breath Test
    • Driving with A Suspended License
    • Property Forfeiture
    • Anti-Drug Profiteering
    • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Español / Spanish Speaking Attorney
  • About
    ▼
    • Testimonials
    • Defending Cases In
      ▼
      • Monmouth County
      • Ocean County
  • Blog
  • Contact
    ▼
    • Receive a Call From Fred
  • DUI Checkpoint Alerts
  • Results
  • Payment Options
  • Home
  • Criminal Defense Services
    • Drug Crimes
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Intent to Distribute Narcotics
      • Prescription Drug Crimes
      • Leader of Narcotics Trafficking Network
    • Weapons Charges
      • Prohibited Weapons and Devices
      • Manufacture, Transport, etc. of Weapons
      • Illegal Possession of a Gun
      • Possession of Weapons for Unlawful Purposes
    • Expungements
    • Theft Attorney
    • Violent Crimes
      • Robbery/Burglary
      • Manslaughter
      • Extortion
      • Assault
      • Sexual Offenses
    • Arson
    • DUI / DWI
      • Alcohol DUI
      • Drug DUI
      • Refusing a Breath Test
    • Driving with A Suspended License
    • Property Forfeiture
    • Anti-Drug Profiteering
    • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Español / Spanish Speaking Attorney
  • About
    • Testimonials
    • Defending Cases In
      • Monmouth County
      • Ocean County
  • Blog
  • Contact
    • Receive a Call From Fred
  • DUI Checkpoint Alerts
  • Results
  • Payment Options
Home >> Reliability of CSAAS Testimony (Part 5)

October 9, 2018 by Fred Sisto

Reliability of CSAAS Testimony (Part 5)

The remand hearing provided an opportunity to test the principles underlying CSAAS in an adversarial setting.  The evidence at the hearing identified a number of shortcomings about the concept of a child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome.  First, the label “syndrome” itself raises serious questions.  Second, CSAAS and its five component behaviors are not easy to define with precision.  Third, there is disagreement as to how the behaviors relate to one another.  Fourth, experts debated the import of the five behaviors at the hearing.  Finally, CSAAS stems from observations made in clinical practice — not systematic scientific study.  Based on the record, it does not appear that CSAAS’s five category theory has been tested and empirically validated as a whole.

The Court thus considers relevant evidence for each of the five behaviors.  (1) Dr. Summit explained secrecy by noting that “the average child never asks and never tells.”  In short, victims keep abuse a secret by not talking about it.  (2) Dr. Summit identified helplessness as a “precondition” to abuse, not a behavior.  The concept appears to state the obvious.  (3) Accommodation refers to the coping mechanism by which a child adjusts to sexual abuse.  It encompasses all possible behaviors from the most resilient to the most self-destructive, and all victims fall under the broad construct in one way or another.  (4) Judge Bariso found that delayed disclosure is generally accepted among the scientific community.  The record supports that finding.  (5) Retraction occurs when a victim truthfully discloses abuse and then recants.  Evidence presented at the hearing revealed that only a minority of victims recant truthful allegations of abuse and that experts do not agree on the rate of recantation.

Expert testimony is supposed to be reserved for matters of which the average juror would not understand on their own. With “delayed disclosure” being the only behavior that is generally accepted in the scientific community, it begs the question of whether that factor is appropriate for expert testimony. That is to say, your average juror would likely infer on their own that victims often delay in disclosing because it is a very difficult thing to do, especially for a child. Thus, expert testimony would be unnecessary, especially in light of the fact that this instruction will be included in the forthcoming model criminal jury charge.

Filed Under: Blog, Criminal Law, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

Testimonials

Fred is a stickler for detail and communicates with clients very, very well. He is smart and astute. I would recommend him unconditionally.

Tom O   

I would highly recommend Mr. Sisto. He is very insightful and proficient, yet still down to Earth. Fred is great at communicating and breaking down the facts. But most importantly, he excels at getting results.

Bill K   

Thanks to Fred I have no criminal record whatsoever.

Luke A   

Great!!! , got my case handled in the exact manner that I was told and would recommend to everyone else in need of legal representation.

Raumelis R   
See More Testimonials

Recent Posts

  • Permits to Carry and Sensitive Places (Part 1)
  • Drug Recognition Evidence (Part 6)
  • Drug Recognition Evidence (Part 5)
  • Drug Recognition Evidence (Part 4)
  • Drug Recognition Evidence (Part 3)
  • Drug Recognition Evidence (Part 2)
  • Drug Recognition Evidence (Part 1)
  • Shoplifting and Sales Tax (Part 2)

Recent Speaking Engagement

Site Disclaimer

Attorney Referral Fees

Frederick P Sisto has earned Lawyer Legion's recognition for Community Leadership
 
Top Criminal Defense Attorney in Brick

Law Office of Frederick P. Sisto

Point Pleasant Office*:
302 Hawthorne Ave, Suite 1
Point Pleasant Beach, NJ 08742

Brick Township Office*:
223 Drum Point Road, Suite 1
Brick Township, NJ 08723

Sea Girt Office*:
2150 NJ-35,
Suite 225
Sea Girt, NJ 08750

Phone: 732-898-3232
Fax: 201-508-3393
*Office visits by appointment only.

Representing clients throughout all court jurisdictions of New Jersey.

WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CRIMINAL TRIAL ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION, NO ASPECT OF THIS ADVERTISEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

en English
en Englishes Spanish