Fred Sisto | Criminal Attorney | Ocean and Monmouth County

Call Us Today
732-898-3232

  • Home
  • Criminal Defense Services
    ▼
    • Drug Crimes
      ▼
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Intent to Distribute Narcotics
      • Prescription Drug Crimes
      • Leader of Narcotics Trafficking Network
    • Weapons Charges
      ▼
      • Prohibited Weapons and Devices
      • Manufacture, Transport, etc. of Weapons
      • Illegal Possession of a Gun
      • Possession of Weapons for Unlawful Purposes
    • Expungements
    • Theft Attorney
    • Violent Crimes
      ▼
      • Robbery/Burglary
      • Manslaughter
      • Extortion
      • Assault
      • Sexual Offenses
    • Arson
    • DUI / DWI
      ▼
      • Alcohol DUI
      • Drug DUI
      • Refusing a Breath Test
    • Driving with A Suspended License
    • Property Forfeiture
    • Anti-Drug Profiteering
    • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Español / Spanish Speaking Attorney
  • About
    ▼
    • Testimonials
    • Defending Cases In
      ▼
      • Monmouth County
      • Ocean County
  • Blog
  • Contact
    ▼
    • Receive a Call From Fred
  • DUI Checkpoint Alerts
  • Results
  • Payment Options
  • Home
  • Criminal Defense Services
    • Drug Crimes
      • Drug Manufacturing
      • Intent to Distribute Narcotics
      • Prescription Drug Crimes
      • Leader of Narcotics Trafficking Network
    • Weapons Charges
      • Prohibited Weapons and Devices
      • Manufacture, Transport, etc. of Weapons
      • Illegal Possession of a Gun
      • Possession of Weapons for Unlawful Purposes
    • Expungements
    • Theft Attorney
    • Violent Crimes
      • Robbery/Burglary
      • Manslaughter
      • Extortion
      • Assault
      • Sexual Offenses
    • Arson
    • DUI / DWI
      • Alcohol DUI
      • Drug DUI
      • Refusing a Breath Test
    • Driving with A Suspended License
    • Property Forfeiture
    • Anti-Drug Profiteering
    • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Español / Spanish Speaking Attorney
  • About
    • Testimonials
    • Defending Cases In
      • Monmouth County
      • Ocean County
  • Blog
  • Contact
    • Receive a Call From Fred
  • DUI Checkpoint Alerts
  • Results
  • Payment Options
Home >> Sentencing Downgrade (Part 4) – In The Interests of Justice Standard

January 10, 2016 by Fred Sisto

Sentencing Downgrade (Part 4) – In The Interests of Justice Standard

Returning to sentencing downgrades under the broader “in the interests of justice standard”, the defendant must provide compelling reasons for the downgrade in addition to, and separate from, the mitigating factors which substantially outweigh the aggravating factors. State v. Megargel, 143 N.J. 484, 496-502 (1996). The focus is not on the offender, but on the offense, its nature, severity, and surrounding circumstances. State v. Lake, 408 N.J. Super. 313, 326 (App. Div. 2009). A trial court should also state why sentencing the defendant to the lowest range of sentencing for the particular offense for which he was convicted, is not a more appropriate sentence than a downgraded sentence. Id.

Notwithstanding the Lake Court’s holding, the below-cited cases confirm that downgrades have been upheld even though the various courts’ focused their compelling reasons on the offender as opposed to the offense. Note however that most of the cases below are all non-binding unpublished opinions whereas Lake is binding and published precedent. Still, since the offender is an inextricable part of the offense, these two considerations will inevitably overlap. Indeed, the seminal Supreme Court case held that “facts personal to the defendant” were as important a consideration as “the degree of the crime” and “the surrounding circumstances of an offense” Megargel, at 500-501. With regard to the degree of the crime, since third and fourth degree crimes cannot be downgraded, second degree flat sentences are obviously the most amenable sentences to downgrades. See 2C:44-1(f)(2).

The reasons offered for downgrading an offense need not be as compelling as the reasons needed to overcome the presumption of imprisonment. State v. Evers, 175 N.J. 355, 389 (2003). Similarly, less compelling reasons are required for the downgrading of a second degree sentence without enhanced penalties. State v. Megargel, 143 N.J. 484, 502 (1996) The powers of reduction are both necessary and desirable features of a system of sentencing. Id. at 495.

If the record demonstrates compelling reasons or that there are no compelling reasons to support a downgraded sentence, an appellate court will exercise original jurisdiction and impose the appropriate sentence. See State v. L.V., 410 N.J. Super. at 108-109, 113 (App. Div. 2009) (exercising original jurisdiction to re-sentence defendant as a downgraded offender where remand would continue incarceration); See also State v. Lake, 408 N.J. Super. at 331 (reversing the downgraded sentence and exercising original jurisdiction to re-sentence in the second-degree range). The Appellate Division will remand the case back to the trial court for re-sentencing instead of exercising original jurisdiction when they hold that that the record needs to be amplified, as opposed to holding that there are a lack of compelling reasons to support a downgrade.

Filed Under: Blog, Criminal Law, Jail Time and Probation

Testimonials

Fred is a stickler for detail and communicates with clients very, very well. He is smart and astute. I would recommend him unconditionally.

Tom O   

I would highly recommend Mr. Sisto. He is very insightful and proficient, yet still down to Earth. Fred is great at communicating and breaking down the facts. But most importantly, he excels at getting results.

Bill K   

Thanks to Fred I have no criminal record whatsoever.

Luke A   

Great!!! , got my case handled in the exact manner that I was told and would recommend to everyone else in need of legal representation.

Raumelis R   
See More Testimonials

Recent Posts

  • Plea Agreements and New Charges (Part 2)
  • Plea Agreements and New Charges (Part 1)
  • Youth and Withholding Imprisonment (Part 2)
  • Youth and Withholding Imprisonment (Part 1)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 4)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 3)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 2)
  • Marijuana and Diversionary Programs (Part 1)

Recent Speaking Engagement

Site Disclaimer

Attorney Referral Fees

Frederick P Sisto has earned Lawyer Legion's recognition for Community Leadership
 
Top Criminal Defense Attorney in Brick

Law Office of Frederick P. Sisto

Point Pleasant Office*:
302 Hawthorne Ave, Suite 1
Point Pleasant Beach, NJ 08742

Brick Township Office*:
223 Drum Point Road, Suite 1
Brick Township, NJ 08723

Sea Girt Office*:
2150 NJ-35,
Suite 225
Sea Girt, NJ 08750

Phone: 732-898-3232
Fax: 201-508-3393
*Office visits by appointment only.

Representing clients throughout all court jurisdictions of New Jersey.

WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CRIMINAL TRIAL ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION, NO ASPECT OF THIS ADVERTISEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

en English
en Englishes Spanish