Territorial Applicability of the Drug-Induced Death Statute (Part 5)

by | Jul 23, 2019 | Blog, Drug Crime

The New Jersey Supreme Court continued in relevant part: We do not agree with the State’s textual interpretation because it defies a commonsense reading of the statute. “Different words used in the same, or a similar, statute are assigned different meanings whenever possible.” 2A Sutherland on Statutory Construction § 46:6 at 261-63 (7th ed. 2007)). The term “conduct which is an element of the offense” — the language used in N.J.S.A. 2C:1-3(a)(1) — is different from the term “conduct charged” — the language used in N.J.S.A. 2C:1-3(b). The terms are not interchangeable. We must ascribe to the Legislature a reason for using different language in separate provisions of the same statute. See Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692, 711 n.9 (2004) (“[W]hen the legislature uses certain language in one part of the statute and different language in another, the court assumes different meanings were intended.” (quoting 2A Sutherland on Statutory Construction § 46:6 at 194 (6th rev. ed. 2000))). In N.J.S.A. 2C:1-3(a)(1), the term “conduct which is an element of the offense” refers to but one element of a completed crime, which is typically sufficient for general territorial-jurisdiction purposes. Distribution is but one element of the drug-induced death statute.

In contrast, the term “conduct charged” suggests a completed crime — all the elements necessary to constitute an offense. The wording of N.J.S.A. 2C:1-3(b) is “conduct charged that would not constitute an offense” in another jurisdiction. In that setting, “conduct charged” is equated with a completed offense, not with a mere element of an offense. All the words in a statute must be given meaning and read in context to reach a sensible interpretation.

Justice Albin’s use of logic and statutory interpretation is sound. The Legislature is often given too much credit and deference by our courts due to the separation of powers between the Legislative and Judicial branches. Here, however, it is clear that the use of different words in the same statute calls for the application of different meanings.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Sisto is very knowledgeable in the specific area of which he practices. I was beyond thankful for the end results of which could not have been achieved without Mr. Sisto's intervention.
Shawn H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is an excellent attorney. Even though we did not initiate the official pleading process, he deep dived into researching and sorted out my questions without any consultation fee. I highly recommend him!
Qianru Z
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I recently retained Mr. Fred Sisto to represent my son regarding a very serious legal matter. If not handled correctly these charges could have resulted in bad consequences for my son's future prospects. Mr. Sisto's knowledge of the criminal justice system is evident since he was able to get all charges dropped as well as getting them expunged from his record. If you need a criminal justice attorney who will respond quickly to all your questions and concern,as well as achieve a satisfactory solution to your case I strongly recommend Attorney Fred Sisto.
Joseph M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a very knowledgeable and effective attorney. His knowledge of the law enables him to understand your issue, plan a strategy to address it and explain the strategy to you. He also possesses excellent communication skills that assist him interactions with other attorneys and judges.
Michael G
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Called back within 10 minutes,very easy to talk to. Not judgmental at all. I am hopeful about the outcome.
Colleen H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is compassionate! His forewarning his network about DUI checkpoints are vital to public interests! He does what it NEEDED by giving us advanced notifications about avoiding situations! Thank you Fred!
Joseph R
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I was very content with Fred’s services. He was extremely communicative throughout the entire process and I am happy with our results.
Lidia D
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I wholeheartedly recommend the legal services of Frederick Sisto. Mr. Sisto brings with him a wealth of knowledge, experience, and professionalism - qualities that make him highly effective at providing legal counsel.
John D
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great attorney, responded very quickly to our emails and calls. The office staff is attentive and knowledgeable as well. Over all a great experience. Highly recommend him.
Alexandra L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto is amazing!! Definitely recommend
Jen A