Territorial Applicability of the Drug-Induced Death Statute (Part 5)

by | Jul 23, 2019 | Blog, Drug Crime

The New Jersey Supreme Court continued in relevant part: We do not agree with the State’s textual interpretation because it defies a commonsense reading of the statute. “Different words used in the same, or a similar, statute are assigned different meanings whenever possible.” 2A Sutherland on Statutory Construction § 46:6 at 261-63 (7th ed. 2007)). The term “conduct which is an element of the offense” — the language used in N.J.S.A. 2C:1-3(a)(1) — is different from the term “conduct charged” — the language used in N.J.S.A. 2C:1-3(b). The terms are not interchangeable. We must ascribe to the Legislature a reason for using different language in separate provisions of the same statute. See Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692, 711 n.9 (2004) (“[W]hen the legislature uses certain language in one part of the statute and different language in another, the court assumes different meanings were intended.” (quoting 2A Sutherland on Statutory Construction § 46:6 at 194 (6th rev. ed. 2000))). In N.J.S.A. 2C:1-3(a)(1), the term “conduct which is an element of the offense” refers to but one element of a completed crime, which is typically sufficient for general territorial-jurisdiction purposes. Distribution is but one element of the drug-induced death statute.

In contrast, the term “conduct charged” suggests a completed crime — all the elements necessary to constitute an offense. The wording of N.J.S.A. 2C:1-3(b) is “conduct charged that would not constitute an offense” in another jurisdiction. In that setting, “conduct charged” is equated with a completed offense, not with a mere element of an offense. All the words in a statute must be given meaning and read in context to reach a sensible interpretation.

Justice Albin’s use of logic and statutory interpretation is sound. The Legislature is often given too much credit and deference by our courts due to the separation of powers between the Legislative and Judicial branches. Here, however, it is clear that the use of different words in the same statute calls for the application of different meanings.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great law firm always give me the updates i need thanks guys... Mark.
Mark P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr Sisto is an excellent lawyer. The tickets I received were nothing compared to the charges i had originally. I got the best possible outcome for my case, and Mr Sisto was incredibly understanding and patient and responded to any questions I had within about 30 minutes of me asking them. I'll be going to him again for any legal trouble I have in the future
Brandon K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Great attorney, responded very quickly to our emails and calls. The office staff is attentive and knowledgeable as well. Over all a great experience. Highly recommend him.
Alexandra L
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Keeps me well informed ! Thank you
Koy T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Mr. Fred Sisto handled a case regarding my business. He was always available to answer my calls directly and helped me with any questions I had. He also had the case dismissed before I was even able to make it to the court room! I know it can be difficult when finding an attorney but I know I made no mistake choosing the law offices of Frederick Sisto, I highly recommend him!!
Kari J
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I got my life back together because of this man he is quick,strategic,and will get you threw almost any criminal matter.When things are looking rough legal wise he will fight for you…FRED SISTO THE WAY TO GO!!!
Byron P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Antes que todo le doy las gracias señor Frederick P Sisto por representarme legalmente es usted un excelente abogado que habla con la verdad desde el principio es usted un abogado profesional que que sabe bien lo que hace ante los juzgados sin importar mi estatus legal en este país me represento con respeto y sobre todo muy profesionalmente y pudo hacer q bajaran mi delito de segundo grado a tercer grado y lo mejor que no permitió que me dieran tempo en carcel mi familia y yo estamos muy agradecidos con usted Puedo recomendar al señor abogado Frederick P Sisto como un excelente abogado y sin duda COMO UNO DE LOS MEJORES DEL ESTADO DE NEW JERSEY First of all I thank you Mister Frederick P Sisto for representing me legally you're an excellent lawyer who speaks to the truth from the beginning you are a professional lawyer who knows well what you do before the courts regardless of my legal status in this P Country I represent with respect and especially very professionally and could make Q lower my second-degree offense to third grade and the best I did not allow me to give tempo in jail my family and I are very grateful to you I can recommend Mr. Freder Attorney Ick P Sisto as an excellent lawyer and certainly as one of the best in the state of NEW JERSEY
Raul F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Current Pre law students and I had a question pertaining to a certain scenario in class. He responded back and gave me a case that broke down exactly what I asked for.
Chad T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Frederick Sisto Law Office guided me through my legal needs, they were very responsive and professional and I would use certainly use them again
Ryan P
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred never represented me but been in touch with him a few times and was a very professional experience from the minute I called the office
Jj B