The Juvenile Waive Statute and Retroactivity (Part 1)

by | Jan 12, 2021 | Blog, Criminal Law, Monmouth County, New Jersey, Ocean County

Juvenile Delinquency

On June 11, 2020, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided the Morris County case of State v. J.V. The principal issue under N.J.S.A. 2A:4A-26.1 was whether the new juvenile waiver statute applied retroactively to juveniles who were sentenced before the statute became effective.

Justice Timpone wrote for a unanimous Court in relevant part: Seventeen-year-old J.V. attempted to take a man’s cellphone and, during the ensuing struggle, stabbed the victim nine times. The police charged J.V. with acts of delinquency which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted attempted murder, armed robbery, and weapons offenses. The State filed a motion to transfer jurisdiction from the Superior Court’s Family Part to the Criminal Part to try J.V. as an adult under the then-existing, but now repealed, juvenile waiver statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:4A-26(a), under which the Legislature tasked the Attorney General (AG) with developing guidelines for prosecutors to follow when seeking to waive a juvenile to adult court.

Following the AG Guidelines, the prosecutor filed a statement of reasons listing certain factors supporting waiving J.V. to adult court. After conducting the waiver hearing, the Family Part judge granted the State’s motion to transfer jurisdiction. J.V.’s counsel made an application for bail, arguing that J.V. had an IQ of 58, had been in special education classes for the majority of his life, and had attempted suicide six times while detained in the juvenile detention center. The Family Part judge denied the requested bail and entered an order waiving jurisdiction on October 23, 2013.

Once in adult court, on June 17, 2015, J.V. entered guilty pleas to attempted murder and armed robbery and the State agreed to recommend concurrent eighteen-year prison terms, subject to the No Early Release Act. On the heels of J.V.’s guilty pleas, the Legislature repealed the juvenile waiver statute, replacing it with Section 26.1. L. 2015, c. 89, §§ 1-7. It codified the AG Guidelines, mandating supplementary factors for prosecutors to consider when seeking to waive a juvenile to adult court, including: the juvenile’s age and maturity, the juvenile’s need for special education classes, the juvenile’s mental health status, and the juvenile’s history of substance abuse and/or emotional instability. N.J.S.A. 2A:4A-26.1(c)(3)(d), 2 (e), and (j). Section 26.1 was not made effective immediately, but instead, became effective on March 1, 2016.

On paper, it reads like the plea offer that J.V. accepted probably should have been rejected in favor of a trial. Even if the proofs were very strong, the maximum sentence for a first-degree crime is 20 years. With one victim and one altercation, it seems very unlikely that the defendant was exposed to consecutive sentences for the separate crimes.

Excellent rating
Based on 288 reviews
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred Sisto handled my case very well. I was happy with outcome. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend him to any of my friends or family.
David V
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred is a detail minded attorney that works tirelessly to get the job done right. If you need help Fred knows how to take care of your issues. Fred has years of experience and will work hard for justice for his clients. Fred is easy to talk to and has great communication skills!
Gibson H
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
For the people. For the little guy My legal bully
Glennlykesmusic
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Fred always publishes where local DWI Checkpoints are going to be! He is also a very prominent Attorney in the Ocean County areas of Point Pleasent and Now a new Brick office!
Michael K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
The DUI checkpoint alerts have been exceptional. Much needed work to bring attention to the unconstitutional searches.
Daniel K
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Very knowledgeable with expungement!!! Thanks again!!!
Nicole B
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Like clockwork thank you for all the info
Lee M
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
I am writing to share my experience working with Fred From the very beginning, he provided outstanding service and demonstrated a high level of professionalism. He was attentive to my needs, communicated clearly, and always made sure I understood each step of the process. What impressed me most was his efficiency—he handled my case quickly without compromising on quality. His dedication and expertise gave me confidence and peace of mind throughout the entire process. I highly recommend Fred to anyone seeking reliable and effective legal support. His commitment to his clients and ability to deliver results promptly truly set him apart.
Aida F
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Frederick is a pleasure to work with,great family guy. Fred pays attention to every detail and is totally accessible.
Tom A
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Not to long ago I ran into a very serious legal issue for the first time in my life, I'm closing in on 60. Needless to say I was unsure of the process. I was fortunate that a friend recommended Fred. Fred handled my case in a professional and courteous manner yet was very down to earth and straight forward. It took nearly 9 month to resolve and during that time Fred was always available to answer questions, explain the process and most of all alleviate my stress. I feel we got the best possible outcome and I would highly recommend Fred to anyone facing a legal/criminal matter
Manny P